Free Republic
Browse · Search
News/Activism
Topics · Post Article

Skip to comments.

US Ready To Withdraw South Korea Troops
Independent (UK) ^ | 3-7-2003 | Rupert Cornwell

Posted on 03/06/2003 6:10:06 PM PST by blam

US ready to withdraw South Korea troops

By Rupert Cornwell in Washington
07 March 2003

Despite the worsening confrontation with North Korea, Washington is considering pulling some or all of its 37,000 troops away from the South's border, and perhaps out of the Korean peninsula altogether.

At a question-and-answer session with Pentagon employees yesterday, Donald Rumsfeld, the US Defence Secretary, said Washington's existing force deployments in Europe and Korea were a Cold War relic.

He added that the South Korean economy was "25 to 35 times" as large as that of the reclusive Communist north, meaning that Seoul had "all the capability in the world of providing the kind of upfront deterrent that's needed". In their current position, close to the Demilitarised Zone separating the two states, the American force was "intrusive" for the South Koreans and "not very flexible" for use elsewhere, Mr Rumsfeld said.

His words reflect the increasing controversy in the South over the presence of American troops. Some restaurants in Seoul have even warned off US servicemen after allegations of crimes committed against Korean civilians.

The South has also been critical of the Bush administration's hard line towards the North, saying that it has undermined its own efforts to build ties with its neighbour and contributed to the present escalation of tensions.

North Korea has restarted a nuclear reactor, which Washington says is only of use for military purposes.

A group of top former Clinton officials – led by Madeleine Albright, who as Secretary of State visited the North in 2000 – joined Senate Democrats in demanding immediate direct talks with Pyongyang.

George Bush has refused, claiming that to do so before North Korea renounced its nuclear ambitions would merely be appeasement of blackmail by a "rogue" regime.

The North's next and even more alarming step might be to switch on the reprocessing plant at the Yongbyon nuclear complex north of Pyongyang, a possible prelude to the manufacture of several plutonium-based nuclear weapons by the summer. This would involve the transfer of 8,000 spent fuel rods now in a cooling pond to the plant.

But as Mr Rumsfeld made clear, the US would not be deterred from making troop adjustments. "Whether the forces would come home or whether they'd move south down the peninsula or to some neighbouring area" was in the final stages of discussion, he said.

The US strategy, analysts say, is to maintain its deterrent umbrella over South Korea, but from a longer range. A foretaste came yesterday with the arrival of a first batch of 24 B-1 and B-52 longer range bombers on the island of Guam, 2,000 miles from North Korean territory.

Washington insists the deployment is precautionary, intended as reminder to the North that the US could handle any crisis on Korea even as it massed forces in the Gulf for an invasion of Iraq. Washington wanted "to show countries throughout the region that we don't have all our eggs in one basket", a spokesman at the US Pacific Air Force headquarters in Hawaii said. But Pyongyang described the action last night as another "preparation for an attack".

Tensions escalated further at the weekend when North Korean fighters briefly intercepted a US reconnaissance plane over the Sea of Japan, in the first such incident since 1969.

Last year, Washington and Seoul agreed on a cut in the number of American bases in South Korea, from 41 to 25 over the next 10 years – but without reducing the overall strength of the US troops.


TOPICS: Foreign Affairs; News/Current Events
KEYWORDS: korean; ready; south; troops; us; withdraw

1 posted on 03/06/2003 6:10:07 PM PST by blam
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | View Replies]

To: blam
"He added that the South Korean economy was "25 to 35 times" as large as that of the reclusive Communist north, meaning that Seoul had "all the capability in the world of providing the kind of upfront deterrent that's needed"

Excellent... Let the dingdongs defend thier own country.

2 posted on 03/06/2003 6:30:30 PM PST by observer5
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: observer5
I spent a total of 4 1/2 years in Korea, primarily in the 2nd Infantry Division and on several Special Forces Mobile Training Teams. I understand the geopolitical and strategic importance of bases there (as part of a containment strategy for China)- but let's face it, the American ground troops in South Korea are essentially sacrificial lambs, meant to be decimated in the first days of any attack so as to guarantee American involvement in any new war on the Korean Peninsula.

Bring them home, move them to Guam, or whatever. Probably should keep a couple of Air Force bases, though, and continue to do joint training with the ROK Army and Marines.

3 posted on 03/06/2003 6:40:57 PM PST by RANGERAIRBORNE
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 2 | View Replies]

To: RANGERAIRBORNE
Beginning to doubt that the time the older males in my family spent there was ill advised.

Also beginning to understand that our borders are where we belong....cannot see which puppetmaster keeps sic-ing us on others around the globe for what. All the result is war and rumors of wars....

Bring 'em home.! Let the South of Korea do its own thing.
4 posted on 03/06/2003 6:50:01 PM PST by Spirited
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 3 | View Replies]

Comment #5 Removed by Moderator

To: observer5
The development of a good base in Alaska to which to redeploy the Korean and Okinawan based forces would place our troops in surprisingly good proximity via great circle routes to Korea and Japan, but still on American soil. We could probably satisfy our strategic interests stationing them in Alaska, while keeping them in the US where what they spend and we spend would benefit our economy. Meanwhile, decisions to deploy them would require no consultation with assholes--er allies. Great circle route for the airliftable component also puts them easily within the orbit for supporting policy about anywhere in the northern hemisphere. Rummie is a blunt instrument, but, IMHO, no dunderhead. We could then charge the Japanese and Koreans for protection. Insurance is cheap and easier to budget for than readiness iteself.
6 posted on 03/06/2003 7:11:29 PM PST by mathurine
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 2 | View Replies]

To: blam
Yes their economy is 25 X bigger than N Korea, But it isnt anywhere near that of China
And N Korea is a surrogate commie partner of the Red Chinese..
As in the last Korean war...it was China and Russia and the comblock neighbors who came to N Koreas aid..how many more partners will they be able to allign before all is said and done?
7 posted on 03/06/2003 7:29:51 PM PST by joesnuffy
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: marujo
Methinks the same. Why pull out now other than to prevent the waste of U.S. lives if North Korea were to do something...stupid.
8 posted on 03/06/2003 7:34:30 PM PST by TSgt (“If I do my full duty, the rest will take care of itself.” - General George S. Patton)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 5 | View Replies]

To: blam
Sell Japan , Taiwan and South Korea a few old nuclear subs that we were going to scrap anyways and make sure the subs have a few short range nuclear cruise missiles on them. Then announce the security of East Asia is going to be left to the East Asians and pull out. North Korea can then spew its hatred and shakedowns on somebody else.
9 posted on 03/06/2003 7:46:06 PM PST by Nateman
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

Disclaimer: Opinions posted on Free Republic are those of the individual posters and do not necessarily represent the opinion of Free Republic or its management. All materials posted herein are protected by copyright law and the exemption for fair use of copyrighted works.

Free Republic
Browse · Search
News/Activism
Topics · Post Article

FreeRepublic, LLC, PO BOX 9771, FRESNO, CA 93794
FreeRepublic.com is powered by software copyright 2000-2008 John Robinson