Skip to comments.
Scientists find mounting environmental, social, economic effects from oil drilling in Alaska
Associated Press ^
| 3-4-03
| JOHN HEILPRIN
Posted on 03/04/2003 3:39:26 PM PST by Oldeconomybuyer
Edited on 04/13/2004 2:41:56 AM PDT by Jim Robinson.
[history]
WASHINGTON (AP) --
(Excerpt) Read more at sfgate.com ...
TOPICS: Business/Economy; Culture/Society; Government; News/Current Events; Politics/Elections; US: Alaska
KEYWORDS: anwr; enviralists
I smell a rat. Wasn't there a "report" from The National Academy of Sciences panel a few years ago that wasn't actually a report from the Academy, but a "panel" assembled to obtain a desired result? Any FR memory help?
To: Oldeconomybuyer
"Scientists" are now experts in sociology and economics?
2
posted on
03/04/2003 3:41:38 PM PST
by
Brilliant
To: Oldeconomybuyer
some positive, such as better schools and health care, and some negative, like increased diabetes and alcoholism. Well they they go again. Now oil is to blame for alcoholism!
DO LIBERALS EVER TAKE PERSONAL RESPONSABILITY FOR ANYTHING? These peopele get sicker by the day.
3
posted on
03/04/2003 3:56:40 PM PST
by
chachacha
To: chachacha
I'll take a shot of 10w30 with my beer
4
posted on
03/04/2003 3:59:54 PM PST
by
grb
To: Oldeconomybuyer
middle east funded scientists find mounting environmental, social, economic effects from oil drilling in Alaska
5
posted on
03/04/2003 4:04:09 PM PST
by
ChadGore
(No matter where you go, there you are.)
To: Oldeconomybuyer
some polar bear dens have been disturbedHorrors.
6
posted on
03/04/2003 4:06:19 PM PST
by
dead
To: dead
'sok, we don't want to drill ANWAR.
KILLING
not
DRILLING
To: ChadGore
or ULTRA LEFT-WING scientists
8
posted on
03/04/2003 4:15:48 PM PST
by
CyberAnt
To: Oldeconomybuyer
NAS went political decades ago.
9
posted on
03/04/2003 4:15:49 PM PST
by
facedown
(Armed in the Heartland)
To: Oldeconomybuyer
I blame Ronald Reagan.
10
posted on
03/04/2003 4:18:33 PM PST
by
Drango
(Two wrongs don't make a right...but three lefts do!)
To: Oldeconomybuyer
This is all too funny.
Over the weekend I picke up a DVD on old TV programs (from the 1950s, it was cheap).
Anyway, the action was filmed outside around Long Beach California (as near as I can figure from the story line).
That does not matter as much as my point, which was in one scene the characters are driving past an oil field. For as far as you could see were oil derricks and oil pumps.
Now, if all that drilling did not kill off the good citizens of Long Beach, why are we concerned about some remote spot a thousand miles from no where.
To: Oldeconomybuyer
The sky is falling!!!!! (enviromentalist barf alert)
To: Oldeconomybuyer
This article is just plain pathetic, I can't believe that
people actually lap this up!!
My father once told me "Figures don't lie but Liars can figure"!
To: *Enviralists; farmfriend; madfly
To: Oldeconomybuyer
Actually, the Caribou do better, breed and thrive, around pipelines. They like the warmth.
15
posted on
03/04/2003 4:32:18 PM PST
by
MonroeDNA
(Leave the monkeys alone.)
To: Libertarianize the GOP; Carry_Okie; Grampa Dave; forester; sasquatch; B4Ranch; SierraWasp; ...
Happy to be back pinging again.
16
posted on
03/04/2003 5:07:57 PM PST
by
farmfriend
( Isaiah 55:10,11)
To: riversarewet
For what ir is worth, the first white in the Santa Barbara area remarked on the odor, and noticed an oily sheen on the water. He also remarked on the black stuff (tar) with which the navites caulked their craft. There is far less oil from the underwater oil seeps (NATURAL seep, for any decerebrate Libs) on the surface now than then.
Why? Think inverted funnels and a pipe to the surface. Think store the trapped oil. Think cash.
Free markets, not agencies clean up oil seeps best.
17
posted on
03/04/2003 6:51:31 PM PST
by
GladesGuru
(In a society predicated upon liberty, it is essnetial to examone principles - -)
To: GladesGuru
You are correct. Another area that oil seeps to the surface is now a major tourist attraction, the La Brea tar pits. Funny, how oil on the ground in the middle of Los Angeles is a tourist attraction, but (potential) oil on the ground in some far reaches of Alaska is an enviromental disaster.
To: farmfriend
BTTT!!!!!
19
posted on
03/05/2003 3:06:04 AM PST
by
E.G.C.
To: E.G.C.
This kind of thinking drives me crazy!! What is so hard to understand: We have to depend on ME oil; they can and do hold us hostage at will by turning off their wells; we have a resource for oil in our own country which would enable us to tell them to 'go pound sand'; some idiots are more concerned about wildlife than humans and a strong America - I repeat - what's so hard to understand - drill for Alaskan oil!!
20
posted on
03/05/2003 3:13:29 AM PST
by
Elkiejg
Disclaimer:
Opinions posted on Free Republic are those of the individual
posters and do not necessarily represent the opinion of Free Republic or its
management. All materials posted herein are protected by copyright law and the
exemption for fair use of copyrighted works.
FreeRepublic.com is powered by software copyright 2000-2008 John Robinson