[tallhappy]

That's nice I'm happy for you.

The issue is you were either wrong or lying.

The things you said he did not do, he did.

Were you stupid, or did you lie. Those are the only two possibilities.

[discostu]

The issue is it's STILL SPAM. by his own admission. Even though I was wrong on the sourcing (feces happens, I said MULTIPLE TIMES I didn't read it all) he still posted a bunch of worthless spam. The post starts off with him saying he'll bold the pertinent information and less than 1% of the thing is bolded, by that very action he admits that less than 1% of the post is pertinent, ie IT'S SPAM.