Free Republic
Browse · Search
News/Activism
Topics · Post Article

To: tallhappy
The issue is it's STILL SPAM. by his own admission. Even though I was wrong on the sourcing (feces happens, I said MULTIPLE TIMES I didn't read it all) he still posted a bunch of worthless spam. The post starts off with him saying he'll bold the pertinent information and less than 1% of the thing is bolded, by that very action he admits that less than 1% of the post is pertinent, ie IT'S SPAM.
180 posted on 03/06/2003 2:24:23 PM PST by discostu (This tag intentionally left blank)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 178 | View Replies ]


To: discostu
Your point that his post was longer than need be is fair enough. If only that's what you'd said.

Your comment was 99% hot air, one percent substance, and at that the substance was wrong.

Why did you become so emotional so quick when you say you don't care about the issue.

186 posted on 03/06/2003 2:44:34 PM PST by tallhappy
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 180 | View Replies ]

Free Republic
Browse · Search
News/Activism
Topics · Post Article


FreeRepublic, LLC, PO BOX 9771, FRESNO, CA 93794
FreeRepublic.com is powered by software copyright 2000-2008 John Robinson