Skip to comments.
Please accept our apology
Posted on 03/01/2003 4:42:29 PM PST by texas tweedie
Edited on 03/01/2003 5:43:37 PM PST by Admin Moderator.
[history]
At the end of the fantastic rally in San Antonio they had an Iman- the word was spelled for the crowd- give a benediction. The Iman was obvuiously not for military action in Iraq, and during the benedictrion prayed for the womem and children of Iraq! This is fine to pray for people everywhere, but this rally was specifically for the US troops and US president. The rally was soooooo awesome, but it had to be politically correct. It put a damper on the rally for me. Do you think I am over reacting? Can't we just support our troops and president without having to be poitically correct?
TOPICS: Politics/Elections; US: Texas
KEYWORDS: newbiethread; rally; sanantonio; unzot; yatta; zot
Navigation: use the links below to view more comments.
first previous 1-20, 21-40, 41-60, 61-68 next last
To: Rabid Republican
Confused here as well...someone spell it out?
To: Admin Moderator
Hate to say so but I don't see the justification for ZOTing this newbee either.
22
posted on
03/01/2003 5:17:17 PM PST
by
McGruff
(It's Time to Bomb Saddam)
To: Harmless Teddy Bear
Jim trained us good.
To: Texas_Jarhead
isp # maybe?
24
posted on
03/01/2003 5:18:30 PM PST
by
TLBSHOW
(God Speed as Angels trending upward dare to fly Tribute to the Risk Takers)
To: Texas_Jarhead
Click on the
history link near the top of the thread to see the original thread.
Original Article Body
At the end of the fantastic rally in San Antonio they had an Iman- the word was spelled for the crowd- give a benediction. The Iman was obvuiously not for military action in Iraq, and during the benedictrion prayed for the womem and children of Iraq! This is fine to pray for people everywhere, but this rally was specifically for the US troops and US president. The rally was soooooo awesome, but it had to be politically correct. It put a damper on the rally for me. Do you think I am over reacting? Can't we just support our troops and president without having to be poitically correct?
To: texas tweedie
If the account was banned, why is the thread still here?
To: Diddle E. Squat
Nice quick work on a Saturday! LOL
27
posted on
03/01/2003 5:24:45 PM PST
by
yonif
To: seamole; TLBSHOW; Admin Moderator
a known IP address would be an acceptable reason but the user did not criticize FreeRepublic.com.
I read the original post before she was banned and then went back and re-read after ZOT appeared just to make sure I didnt miss anything. She asked about the PC or appropriateness if you prefer, of an Iman praying for Iraqi women and children at a Support our Troops rally.
I guess I'm missing some aspect of this post that warrants banning the user.
Comment #29 Removed by Moderator
To: seamole
It was a troll post and a poor vanity wrapped together. Both are reasons for the ZOT.
I don't know enough about poster to say the ban was overstepping, but the mods do.
I trust their judgement and I assume they will fix it if it turns out to be in error.
sure looked like a kiddie troll to me.
To: Admin Moderator
I'm afraid that I don't understand the reason for the ZOT either.
It seems as if the poster attended a pro-troops / pro-president rally they enjoyed. This poster later became discouraged when an Imam was given the stage for PC reasons.
So from this I gathered that:
1. the poster is pro-troops / pro- president.
2. dislikes PC BS
I've recently gorged my self on sweet&sour chicken and fried rice and might be suffering MSG hallucinations but this seems like a typical post I've seem from many freepers. Am I missing something?
To: tet68
Warning, Zot must be used in a timely manner or otherwise all warrantys are null and void.Watch it!
Comment #33 Removed by Moderator
To: seamole; Texas_Jarhead
You might want to check the Jim Robinson update at the top!
34
posted on
03/01/2003 5:38:42 PM PST
by
TLBSHOW
(God Speed as Angels trending upward dare to fly Tribute to the Risk Takers)
To: texas tweedie; All
We've restored this poster. We sincerely do not want to ban people who are conservatives. Please accept our deepest apologizes.
To: TLBSHOW
I have never seen an un-ZOT! before.
36
posted on
03/01/2003 5:43:40 PM PST
by
Harmless Teddy Bear
(Sometimes "peace" is another word for surrender.)
To: seamole
LOL! you may be right, but I cannot defend anyone who spells that bad.
It's funny, but most of the bad spellers have been zapped. It must be a socialist trait.
To: Admin Moderator
What I don't understand is why are newbies allowed to post articles right away? Is it to provide ZOT entertainment? It wasn't always this way. When I sighed up over a year ago, there was a "probation period" during which newbies were allowed to post replies to existing threads but were not allowed to post new articles for a certain amount of time or before participating in existing threads. Why was this policy revoked? It makes sense to me.
38
posted on
03/01/2003 5:44:29 PM PST
by
Alouette
To: Harmless Teddy Bear
Me neither. Can they DO that???
To: Harmless Teddy Bear
is there a picture of one? LOL
40
posted on
03/01/2003 5:45:00 PM PST
by
TLBSHOW
(God Speed as Angels trending upward dare to fly Tribute to the Risk Takers)
Navigation: use the links below to view more comments.
first previous 1-20, 21-40, 41-60, 61-68 next last
Disclaimer:
Opinions posted on Free Republic are those of the individual
posters and do not necessarily represent the opinion of Free Republic or its
management. All materials posted herein are protected by copyright law and the
exemption for fair use of copyrighted works.
FreeRepublic.com is powered by software copyright 2000-2008 John Robinson