Free Republic
Browse · Search
News/Activism
Topics · Post Article

Skip to comments.

SUPPORT THE LIBERTY AMENDMENT
Fiedor Report On the News #304 ^ | 3-2-03 | Doug Fiedor

Posted on 03/01/2003 9:42:45 AM PST by forest

The text of a proposed Constitutional amendment is provided for discussion below. The Liberty Amendment was proposed in the 1970s and, they say, was approved by five states. Because of the New World Order fears, and the very real imposing actions of the United Nations on the freedom of American citizens, the Liberty Amendment should be even more interesting to Americans today.

For Tenth Amendment advocates, the Liberty Amendment goes far in keeping the federal government out of matters that should be solely a state's business. And, with only a minimal change, the proposed amendment could also be worded so as to insure that no treaty or agreement will ever overrule anything in our Constitution.

Calling it necessary for the promotion of individual liberty and limited government, back in 1998, Congressman Ron Paul (R-TX) submitted the Liberty Amendment as HJ-116.

"Over the years this amendment has enjoyed widespread support and has been introduced several times in the past by various Members of Congress, but finally this measure has a chance of success given the conservative Congress and mood of the country in favor of a more limited, constitutional government which respects individual liberty," Paul stated when he introduced the bill. (1)

"The income tax is the most regressive tax imaginable, allowing government to take first claim on our lives. The income tax assumes government owns us, as individuals, and has a sovereign claim to the fruits of our labor. This is immoral. But government has been compelled to levy this economically damaging tax because government has grown so big. By reducing the size of the federal government to those functions strictly enumerated in the Constitution, there will no longer be a need for the income tax," said Paul.

Obviously, the Liberty Amendment will not be a cure for all concerns citizens have with today's federal government. It would, however, cause a lot of very worthwhile changes. For that reason, we provide the full text -- with the explanation inserted by the authors -- for your examination.

-----------------------------

LIBERTY AMENDMENT

"Section 1. The government of the United States shall not engage in any business, professional, commercial, financial or industrial enterprise except as specified in the Constitution."

The first section terminates ownership and operation of all business-type activities currently operated by the federal government, except those authorized by the Constitution. Operation of the Post Office, and certain functions Constitutionally connected with the Armed Forces will not be affected.

"Section 2. The Constitution or laws of any State, or the laws of the United States shall not be subject to the terms of any foreign or domestic agreement which would abrogate this amendment."

This section insures that the amendment's effectiveness cannot be voided by treaties made with another country, or the United Nations. In fact, Section 2 will require that Congress revise or repeal numerous laws in order to limit the federal government's activities to the original intent of the Constitution.

"Section 3. The activities of the United States Government which violate the intent and purpose of this amendment shall, within a period of three years from the date of ratification of this amendment, be liquidated and the properties and facilities affected shall be sold."

The federal government will be allowed three years to divest itself of hundreds of businesses and other functions not authorized by the Constitution. This will also include such things as returning national forests and mineral rights back to the states. Again, those properties -- Post Offices, office buildings, military bases, etc. -- used for Constitutionally authorized functions, will not be affected.

"Section 4. Three years after the ratification of this amendment the sixteenth article of amendments to the Constitution of the United States shall stand repealed and thereafter Congress shall not levy taxes on personal incomes, estates, and/or gifts."

This section effectively scraps the Sixteenth Amendment, and hence the IRS and the whole income tax system. This also means that every taxpayer in the country will suddenly realize at least a 20% increase in take home pay.

-----------------------------

1. <http://www.house.gov/paul/press/press98/pr042898liberty.htm>

 

 END


TOPICS: Activism/Chapters; Business/Economy; Constitution/Conservatism; Crime/Corruption; Culture/Society; Editorial; Foreign Affairs; Government; Philosophy; US: Texas
KEYWORDS: 10thamend; constitutionalam; fifthricher; freedom; hj116; irsdamaging; irsout; libertarians; libertyamend; limitsfedgov; newworldorder; protectsstates; ronpaullist; ronpaulrtx; scraps16th; unout; uscitizens
Because of the New World Order fears, and the very real imposing actions of the United Nations on the freedom of American citizens, the Liberty Amendment should be even more interesting to Americans today.

Tenth Amendment advocates will rejoice over the end of the 16th Amendment.

Back in 1998, Congressman Ron Paul (R-TX) submitted the Liberty Amendment as HJ-116.

The income tax is the most regressive tax imaginable, allowing government to take first claim on our lives. By reducing the size of the federal government to those functions strictly enumerated in the Constitution, there will no longer be a need for the income tax.

Section 1. The government of the United States shall not engage in any business, professional, commercial, financial or industrial enterprise except as specified in the Constitution. [It's about time.]

Section 2. The Constitution or laws of any State, or the laws of the United States shall not be subject to the terms of any foreign or domestic agreement which would abrogate this amendment. [Away with the UN.] 8<))

Section 4. Three years after the ratification of this amendment the sixteenth article of amendments to the Constitution of the United States shall stand repealed and thereafter Congress shall not levy taxes on personal incomes, estates, and/or gifts. [Finally.]

Please note: The explanation was inserted by the authors.

1 posted on 03/01/2003 9:42:45 AM PST by forest
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | View Replies]

Comment #2 Removed by Moderator

To: RazedInChaos
These rights ARE GUARANTEED by the Constitution. However, the citizens of each State must be ever vigilant that the State not attempt to turn rights into privliges and then revoke them at will. This is always going to be an on-going fight.
3 posted on 03/01/2003 10:11:37 AM PST by dcwusmc ("The most dangerous man, to any government, is the man who is able to think things out for himself.")
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 2 | View Replies]

To: *Ron Paul List; *libertarians
http://www.freerepublic.com/perl/bump-list
4 posted on 03/01/2003 10:15:26 AM PST by Libertarianize the GOP (Ideas have consequences)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 3 | View Replies]

To: forest
This amendment is good, but if ratified, Congress would just expand 1-8-3 farther.

5 posted on 03/01/2003 10:39:41 AM PST by William Terrell (Advertise in this space - Low rates)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: Doug
Hey Doug, RonPaul's amendment is just great. It says all the stuff you have been writing, and it says all the stuff I wrote for the Klamath Basin - including terminating the national this and thats.

How much chance do you give this amendment this time around, Doug?

6 posted on 03/01/2003 10:47:29 AM PST by forest
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: BufordP; Congressman Billybob; DarthRaven; Dave Dilegge; Doctor Raoul; Fred Mertz; ...
pings )))))))
7 posted on 03/01/2003 5:16:11 PM PST by Xthe17th (FREE THE STATES. Repudiate the 17th amendment!)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: Xthe17th
Thanks for the ping. This is similar to an amendment (minus the income tax article) discussed at CPAC that narrowly failed to pass in the 1950's soon after the creation of the UN.
8 posted on 03/02/2003 7:15:53 AM PST by LisaFab (Loved FReepin the Freaks!)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 7 | View Replies]

To: LisaFab
BUMP for Sunday.
9 posted on 03/02/2003 9:52:03 AM PST by dcwusmc ("The most dangerous man, to any government, is the man who is able to think things out for himself.")
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 8 | View Replies]

Disclaimer: Opinions posted on Free Republic are those of the individual posters and do not necessarily represent the opinion of Free Republic or its management. All materials posted herein are protected by copyright law and the exemption for fair use of copyrighted works.

Free Republic
Browse · Search
News/Activism
Topics · Post Article

FreeRepublic, LLC, PO BOX 9771, FRESNO, CA 93794
FreeRepublic.com is powered by software copyright 2000-2008 John Robinson