Free Republic
Browse · Search
News/Activism
Topics · Post Article

Skip to comments.

World tackles peril of the bovine burps
The Independent (UK) ^ | 01 March 2003 | Michael McCarthy, Environment Editor

Posted on 03/01/2003 7:11:51 AM PST by aculeus

Save the planet – stop cows burping. Unlikely as that sounds, it's a serious scientific mission.

Cattle around the world produce huge amounts of methane, a powerful gas, which accounts for about a fifth of the greenhouse effect.

The methane cows belch out every day floats into the stratosphere to join carbon dioxide and other gases holding in the Sun's reflected heat and causing the Earth's temperature to soar, with potentially disastrous effects. But researchers at the Rowett Research Institute in Aberdeen say they are close to producing a bovine belch-inhibitor.

It is a combination of sugars and a novel oxidising bacterium. The scientists believe that, when added to cows' feed, the new substance might reduce the gaseous emissions substantially.

Let's hope so. Bad breath is one thing. Wrecking the atmosphere for us all is another


TOPICS: Crime/Corruption; Culture/Society; Extended News; Foreign Affairs; United Kingdom
KEYWORDS: belchinhibitor; bovine; explodingcows; perilofcowburps; rowettresearchins; thisisseries; worldseries

1 posted on 03/01/2003 7:11:51 AM PST by aculeus
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | View Replies]

To: aculeus
Oh my friggin' goodness.

I'd say the environuts have gone too far, but this is actually one of their more moderate proposals.

2 posted on 03/01/2003 7:12:59 AM PST by Thane_Banquo
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: aculeus; Clemenza; rmlew
Most living organisms also produce carbon dioxide. Making the planet devoid of all life will surely prevent global warming.
3 posted on 03/01/2003 7:14:37 AM PST by Cacique (Censored by Admin Moderator)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

Comment #4 Removed by Moderator

To: TonyRo76
Coming soon to TV; The National Bovine Flatulence Telethon.
5 posted on 03/01/2003 7:24:40 AM PST by Eric in the Ozarks
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 4 | View Replies]

To: aculeus

Cattle around the world produce huge amounts of methane, a powerful gas, which accounts for about a fifth of the greenhouse effect.

Strange how they always want to leave out Water Vapor when counting up the effect of "greenhouse" gases.

 

http://www.clearlight.com/~mhieb/WVFossils/greenhouse_data.html

 

Water vapor overwhelms
all other natural and man-made
greenhouse
contributions.

 

3. Table 3, shows what happens when the effect of water vapor is factored in, and together with all other greenhouse gases expressed as a relative % of the total greenhouse effect.

 

TABLE 3.

Role of Atmospheric Greenhouse Gases
(man-made and natural) as a % of Relative
Contribution to the "Greenhouse Effect"

Based on concentrations (ppb) adjusted for heat retention characteristics Percent of Total  Percent of Total --adjusted for water vapor
 Water vapor  -----  95.000%
 Carbon Dioxide (CO2) 72.369%   3.618%
 Methane (CH4) 7.100%   0.360%
Nitrous oxide (N2O) 19.000%   0.950%
 CFC's (and other misc. gases) 1.432%   0.072%
 Total 100.000%   100.000%

 

 

Putting it all together:
total human greenhouse gas contributions
add up to about 0.28% of the greenhouse effect.

 

5. To finish with the math, by calculating the product of the adjusted CO2 contribution to greenhouse gases (3.618%) and % of CO2 concentration from anthropogenic (man-made) sources (3.225%), we see that only (0.03618 X 0.03225) or 0.117% of the greenhouse effect is due to atmospheric CO2 from human activity. The other greenhouse gases are similarly calculated and are summarized below.

TABLE 4a.

Anthropogenic (man-made) Contribution to the "Greenhouse
Effect," expressed as % of Total (water vapor INCLUDED)

Based on concentrations (ppb) adjusted for heat retention characteristics  % of All Greenhouse Gases

% Natural

% Man-made

 Water vapor 95.000% 

 94.999%

0.001% 
 Carbon Dioxide (CO2) 3.618% 

 3.502%

0.117% 
 Methane (CH4) 0.360% 

 0.294%

0.066% 
 Nitrous Oxide (N2O) 0.950% 

 0.903%

0.047% 
 Misc. gases ( CFC's, etc.) 0.072% 

 0.025%

0.047% 
 Total 100.00% 

 99.72

0.28% 

 


6 posted on 03/01/2003 8:37:07 AM PST by ancient_geezer
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: aculeus
Cattle around the world produce huge amounts of methane, a powerful gas, which accounts for about a fifth of the greenhouse effect.

What idiot wrote this?

Methane as a greenhouse gas constitutes aproximately 1/278th(.36%) of all greenhouse gases, not 1/5th(20%).

7 posted on 03/01/2003 10:54:32 AM PST by PeaceBeWithYou (De Oppresso Liber!)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: PeaceBeWithYou
Tell a lie often enough, and it becomes true.
8 posted on 03/01/2003 10:57:15 AM PST by Cold Heat
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 7 | View Replies]

To: aculeus
I fart in their general direction!
9 posted on 03/01/2003 10:57:55 AM PST by Cold Heat
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: PeaceBeWithYou
Methane is actually the least powerful gas, ask any refinery worker.

At only 900 btu/cu.ft. it's useless & worthless unless mixed with more powerful complex hydrocarbons, like, say, envirowackos, now you've got something to burn!

10 posted on 03/01/2003 11:02:23 AM PST by norraad
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 7 | View Replies]

To: norraad
"Methane is actually the least powerful gas, ask any refinery worker."

Methane is the "best possible hydrocarbon" fuel in the sense that it has the highest hydrogen-to-carbon ratio (4:1) of any hydrocarbon. Kerosene/gasoline are roughly 2:1. Propane is 8:3 or 2.67.

Countering this is methane's low density--about half as dense as gasoline, which makes it "least powerful" on a volume basis--not on a mass basis.

Methane is the best rocket fuel of all the hydrocarbons. It is superior to RP-1 (basically refined kerosene) in terms of performance. It requires larger tanks, though.

Methane is a superior coolant to kerosene, propane, and every other hydrocarbon. Only pure hydrogen is better as a coolant. This is important in propellant-cooled rocket engines.

--Boris

11 posted on 03/01/2003 4:09:49 PM PST by boris
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 10 | View Replies]

To: boris
Yes, it's also the perfect metaphor for how in theory something is great or better than what your using presently, but when you try to apply that pretty on paper theory all hell breaks loose.

As the smallest link in the hydrocarbon chain it's great, but it is, after all, only a link.

Love the CH4!

12 posted on 03/02/2003 4:20:15 AM PST by norraad
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 11 | View Replies]

Disclaimer: Opinions posted on Free Republic are those of the individual posters and do not necessarily represent the opinion of Free Republic or its management. All materials posted herein are protected by copyright law and the exemption for fair use of copyrighted works.

Free Republic
Browse · Search
News/Activism
Topics · Post Article

FreeRepublic, LLC, PO BOX 9771, FRESNO, CA 93794
FreeRepublic.com is powered by software copyright 2000-2008 John Robinson