Free Republic
Browse · Search
News/Activism
Topics · Post Article

Skip to comments.

MUST READ: FDR's fireside chat on the Nazi/Axis threat - and their mindless appeasers!
history ^ | 1938 | FDR

Posted on 02/27/2003 7:55:29 AM PST by Enduring Freedom

FDR: Not a fireside chat on war; a talk on national security...

My friends: This is not a fireside chat on war. It is a talk on national security; because the nub of the whole purpose of your President is to keep you now, and your children later, and your grandchildren much later, out of a last-ditch war for the preservation of American independence and all of the things that American independence means to you and to me and to ours...

If Great Britain goes down, the Axis powers will control the Continents of Europe, Asia, Africa, Australia, and the high seas-and they will be in a position to bring enormous military and naval resources against this hemisphere. It is no exaggeration to say that all of us in all the Americas would be living at the point of a gun-a gun loaded with explosive bullets, economic as well as military.

We should enter upon a new and terrible era in which the whole world, our hemisphere included, would be run by threats of brute force. And to survive in such a world, we would have to convert ourselves permanently into a militaristic power on the basis of war economy.

Some of us like to believe that even if Britain falls, we are still safe, because of the broad expanse of the Atlantic and of the Pacific.

But the width of those oceans is not what it was in the days of clipper ships. At one point between Africa and Brazil the distance is less than it is from Washington to Denver, Colorado, five hours for the latest type of bomber. And at the north end of the Pacific Ocean, America and Asia almost touch each other. Why, even today we have planes that could fly from the British Isles to New England and back again without refueling. And remember that the range of the modern bomber is ever being increased.

During the past week many people in all parts of the nation have told me what they wanted me to say tonight. Almost all of them expressed a courageous desire to hear the plain truth about the gravity of the situation. One telegram, however, expressed the attitude of the small minority who want to see no evil and hear no evil, even though they know in their hearts that evil exists. That telegram begged me not to tell again of the ease with which our American cities could be bombed by any hostile power which had gained bases in this Western Hemisphere. The gist of that telegram was: "Please, Mr. President, don't frighten us by telling us the facts." Frankly and definitely there is danger ahead-danger against which we must prepare. But we well know that we cannot escape danger, or the fear of danger, by crawling into bed and pulling the covers over our heads...

There are those who say that the Axis powers would never have any desire to attack the Western Hemisphere. That is the same dangerous form of wishful thinking which has destroyed the powers of resistance of so many conquered peoples. The plain facts are that the Nazis have proclaimed, time and again, that all other races are their inferiors and therefore subject to their orders. And most important of all, the vast resources and wealth of this American hemisphere constitute the most tempting loot in all of the round world.

Let us no longer blind ourselves to the undeniable fact that the evil forces which have crushed and undermined and corrupted so many others are already within our own gates. Your government knows much about them and every day is ferreting them out.

Their secret emissaries are active in our own and in neighboring countries. They seek to stir up suspicion and dissension, to cause internal strife. They try to turn capital against labor, and vice versa. They try to reawaken long slumbering racial and religious enmities which should have no place in this country. They are active in every group that promotes intolerance. They exploit for their own ends our own natural abhorrence of war.

These trouble-breeders have but one purpose. It is to divide our people, to divide them into hostile groups and to destroy our unity and shatter our will to defend ourselves.

There are also American citizens, many of them in high places, who, unwittingly in most cases, are aiding and abetting the work of these agents. I do not charge these American citizens with being foreign agents. But I do charge them with doing exactly the kind of work that the dictators want done in the United States. These people not only believe that we can save our own skins by shutting our eyes to the fate of other nations. Some of them go much further than that. They say that we can and should become the friends and even the partners of the Axis powers. Some of them even suggest that we should imitate the methods of the dictatorships. But Americans never can and never will do that.

The experience of the past two years has proven beyond doubt that no nation can appease the Nazis. No man can tame a tiger into a kitten by stroking it. There can be no appeasement with ruthlessness. There can be no reasoning with an incendiary bomb. We know now that a nation can have peace with the Nazis only at the price of total surrender.

Even the people of Italy have been forced to become accomplices of the Nazis; but at this moment they do not know how soon they will be embraced to death by their allies.

The American appeasers ignore the warning to be found in the fate of Austria, Czechoslovakia, Poland, Norway, Belgium, the Netherlands, Denmark and France. They tell you that the Axis powers are going to win anyway; that all of this bloodshed in the world could be saved, that the United States might just as well throw its influence into the scale of a dictated peace and get the best out of it that we can.

They call it a "negotiated peace." Nonsense! Is it a negotiated peace if a gang of outlaws surrounds your community and on threat of extermination makes you pay tribute to save your own skins?

Such a dictated peace would be no peace at all. It would be only another armistice, leading to the most gigantic armament race and the most devastating trade wars in all history. And in these contests the Americas would offer the only real resistance to the Axis powers. With all their vaunted efficiency, with all their parade of pious purpose in this war, there are still in their background the concentration camp and the servants of God in chains.

The history of recent years proves that the shootings and the chains and the concentration camps are not simply the transient tools but the very altars of modern dictatorships. They may talk of a "new order" in the world, but What they have in mind is only a revival of the oldest and worst tyranny. In that there is no liberty, no religion, no hope.

The proposed "new order" is the very opposite of a United States of Europe or a United States of Asia. It is not a government based upon the consent of the governed. It is not a union of ordinary, self-respecting men and women to protect themselves and their freedom and their dignity from oppression. It is an unholy alliance of power and pelf to dominate and to enslave the human race...

If we are to be completely honest with ourselves, we must admit that there is risk in any course we may take. But I deeply believe that the great majority of our people agree that the course that I advocate involves the least risk now and the greatest hope for world peace in the future...

I believe that the Axis powers are not going to win this war. I base that belief on the latest and the best of information.

We have no excuse for defeatism. We have every good reason for hope- hope for peace, yes, and hope for the defense of our civilization and for the building of a better civilization in the future.

I have the profound conviction that the American people are now determined to put forth a mightier effort than they have ever yet made to increase our production of all the implements of defense, to meet the threat to our democratic faith.

As President of the United States, I call for that national effort. I call for it in the name of this nation which we love and honor and which we are privileged and proud to serve. I call upon our people with absolute confidence that our common cause will greatly succeed.

--FDR


TOPICS: Your Opinion/Questions
KEYWORDS: fdr; firesidechat; vanityfdrnazi
Thank you, Mia T, for bring this to the attention of Freepers.

The speech is as relevant today as it was then.

Spread the word!

1 posted on 02/27/2003 7:55:30 AM PST by Enduring Freedom
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | View Replies]

To: Enduring Freedom
Is it wise to use FDR to promote Bush's war plans?
2 posted on 02/27/2003 8:32:04 AM PST by Nephi (Extremism in the defense of liberty is no vice. Moderation in the pursuit of justice is no virtue.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: Nephi
If Sheryl Crow said what Bush said, would it matter?

Conservatives pride themselves on being content-driven, not image-oriented or celebrity-obsessed.

The fact is, the words spoken to American at that critical time by FDR are indeed relevant.

He warned America from emboldening her enemies with peace protests.

He warned them against thinking they could ignore the problem and be safe.

And he warned them that the price of peace was fighting against evil, before it was too late.

3 posted on 02/28/2003 3:20:26 AM PST by Enduring Freedom
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 2 | View Replies]

To: Enduring Freedom
This thread doesn't seem to have much interest, but I'll answer your post, anyway.

If Sheryl Crow said what Bush said, would it matter?

It would be irrelevent if Crow said what Bush said because she is merely a citizen voicing her opinion. It would be irrelevent, too, because Crow is in no position to embroil America in a war.

Conservatives pride themselves on being content-driven, not image-oriented or celebrity-obsessed.

Hence, my view that Crow's view would be irrelevent.

He warned America from emboldening her enemies with peace protests.

FDR had ulterior motives, I don't believe Bush does.

FDR was frustrated by the American public's refusal to get involved in WW2. This is why FDR bunched up our navy at Pearl Harbor as he provoked the Japanese. He wanted the attack on Pearl Harbor...and it worked.

He warned them against thinking they could ignore the problem and be safe. And he warned them that the price of peace was fighting against evil, before it was too late.

Apparently, you admire the man who I characterize as the second worst president (Woodrow Wilson was the worst.) our country has ever had. You would not be alone, but I thought only Democrats admired communists.

4 posted on 02/28/2003 10:43:51 AM PST by Nephi (Extremism in the defense of liberty is no vice. Moderation in the pursuit of justice is no virtue.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 3 | View Replies]

Comment #5 Removed by Moderator

Comment #6 Removed by Moderator

Comment #7 Removed by Moderator

To: Nephi
Sorry about the multi-post...I even checked to see if it came up before I re-submitted it.
8 posted on 02/28/2003 12:25:09 PM PST by Nephi (Extremism in the defense of liberty is no vice. Moderation in the pursuit of justice is no virtue.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 7 | View Replies]

To: Nephi
The content of the speech is brilliant.

While continuing to parse and analyse, spend time on the point of the post, which is the written words of the speech, and their parallel in the present.

9 posted on 03/01/2003 7:43:34 AM PST by Enduring Freedom
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 7 | View Replies]

To: Enduring Freedom
These trouble-breeders have but one purpose. It is to divide our people, to divide them into hostile groups and to destroy our unity and shatter our will to defend ourselves.

Sounds like “progressive” democrats to me. FDR nailed them right on the head... even though he was talking about nazis and facists.

That people like Kennedy, Byrd, McDermott, Waters, Frank, Daschle and a host of others call themselves Americans is a blatent lie!

10 posted on 03/01/2003 8:02:27 AM PST by johnny7
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: johnny7
You're spot on, friend.

The treasonous behavior of Americans is the deadliest enemy of all, the enemy within.

These people threaten the very existence of you, your family and friends, and this nation.

We need to stop playing PC lunacy.

That is reserved for Democrats and the State Department.

11 posted on 03/03/2003 3:25:08 PM PST by Enduring Freedom
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 10 | View Replies]

To: Enduring Freedom
FDR also had another great quote, I would have sworn Ronald Reagan himself could have said it:

"The lessons of history, confirmed by the evidence immediately before me, show conclusively that continued dependence upon relief induces a spiritual and moral disintegration fundamentally destructive to the national fibre. To dole out relief in this way is to administer a narcotic, a subtle destroyer of the human spirit. It is inimical to the dictates of sound policy. It is in violation of the traditions of America. Work must be found for able-bodied but destitute workers. The Federal Government must and shall quit this business of relief."

12 posted on 03/03/2003 3:32:45 PM PST by dfwgator
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 9 | View Replies]

To: dfwgator
It is unbelievable how low the 'Rat party has descended.

Your FDR quote is entirely rational.

Reading John F. Kennedy's speech on the horrors of government intrusion on American businesses and the burden of high taxes was another such moment.

"Our obsolete tax system exerts too heavy a drag on private purchasing power, profits, and employment," Kennedy told Congress in his State of the Union address. "It distorts the use of resources. It invites recurrent recessions, depresses our Federal revenues, and causes chronic budget deficits.... This [cutting taxes] is the most urgent task confronting the Congress in 1963."

The Democratic Party of 2003 might just as well be the Communist Party, or the Nation of Islam, by comparison.

13 posted on 03/03/2003 3:42:06 PM PST by Enduring Freedom
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 12 | View Replies]

Disclaimer: Opinions posted on Free Republic are those of the individual posters and do not necessarily represent the opinion of Free Republic or its management. All materials posted herein are protected by copyright law and the exemption for fair use of copyrighted works.

Free Republic
Browse · Search
News/Activism
Topics · Post Article

FreeRepublic, LLC, PO BOX 9771, FRESNO, CA 93794
FreeRepublic.com is powered by software copyright 2000-2008 John Robinson