Free Republic
Browse · Search
News/Activism
Topics · Post Article

Skip to comments.

Iraq War Cost Could Soar, Pentagon Says
LA Times ^ | February 26, 2003 | Peter G. Gosselin and Robin Wright

Posted on 02/26/2003 7:42:58 AM PST by zefrog

WASHINGTON -- The Pentagon has begun telling the White House and Congress that defeating Iraq and occupying the country for six months could cost as much as $85 billion, according to sources — considerably more than what senior administration officials have been saying in public.

Combined with aid for regional allies such as Turkey, the price tag for the conflict could top the $100-billion mark, twice the war costs cited just last month by Defense Secretary Donald H. Rumsfeld and an amount that the White House dismissed as outlandish last fall.

And the tally could rise further. Indeed, some close to the process say war planners have no firm grip on the conflict's final costs, a fact that is causing consternation among administration policymakers as the nation edges closer to war.

"It's like watching numbers roll higher and higher on a slot machine," said one State Department official, who asked not to be named.

[...]

(Excerpt) Read more at latimes.com ...


TOPICS: Business/Economy; Foreign Affairs; Front Page News; Government
KEYWORDS: allies; cost; iraq; iraqcosts; warlist
As mentioned in the paper, in 1991 virtually the whole final bill was paid by allies (Japan, EU, Iraq's neighbours). Unlikely this time.
1 posted on 02/26/2003 7:42:58 AM PST by zefrog
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | View Replies]

To: zefrog
Sometimes it is expensive to be the world's super power.
Gotta do what you gotta do.
2 posted on 02/26/2003 7:44:37 AM PST by Galtoid
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: zefrog

WTC attacks cost NY over $33 billion


Associated Press Posted on Wed, Nov. 13, 2002

Government experts say the financial toll of the terrorist attacks on New York City amounts to $33 billion to $36 billion in lost wages and business, property damage and cleanup.

The losses, estimated from October 2001 through June, include $7.8 billion the 2,795 people killed at the World Trade Center would have earned and $21.6 billion to clean up and replace the twin towers.

The report by the Federal Reserve Bank of New York, released Tuesday, appears in the November issue of the bank's Economic Policy Review.

The Sept. 11, 2001, attack "significantly reduced the productive potential of the New York City economy" and hit the airline, restaurant, hotel and financial services industries especially hard, the report said.

Those businesses alone accounted for 42,000 of the 51,000 private-sector jobs lost in the city in October 2001, the report said.

The financial services industry, with many businesses headquartered at the trade center, lost 12,000 jobs in October 2001, and an additional 6,000 jobs through June, the report said. The number of jobs at the city's two airports fell by about 20 percent.

The report calculated the lost income of the victims of the attacks by finding the average income of trade center employees - $127,000 a year - their average age, and estimating how much they would earn until they retired. The loss amounted to $2.8 million per worker.

The city lost an additional $3.6 billion to $6.4 billion in wages from job cuts and reduced hours in businesses like the restaurant industry, the report said. Studies showed some residents also smoked and drank more and became depressed after the attacks, which likely also cut productivity.

The cleanup and replacement costs for the World Trade Center includes a $1.4 billion estimate to replace a commuter rail hub destroyed underneath the center.

An $11.2 billion estimate to replace the trade center's two towers assumed officials "will essentially duplicate what existed before the attack." Six architects have issued competing proposals for developing the site and no conclusions have been reached.

3 posted on 02/26/2003 7:55:06 AM PST by sam_paine
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: Galtoid
Seems to me, $100B is a bargain, considering.

Initial estimates a month after 9/11 were $105B, now they're $33B. I'll bet this $100B Iraq number is overstated, as well.

4 posted on 02/26/2003 7:58:08 AM PST by sam_paine
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 3 | View Replies]

To: sam_paine
I'll bet this $100B Iraq number is overstated, as well.

Not likely. This number takes into account a six month occupation. Everyone knows we will be there much longer than that.
5 posted on 02/26/2003 8:28:46 AM PST by Belial
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 4 | View Replies]

To: zefrog
I don't care about the costs. Our safety is MUCH more important than money. We can make more money. Lives lost to terrorist attacks cannot be replaced.

I think this war is as much about sending a messages to our enemies. We have the resources, capability and WILL to defeat you. Support terrorism and seal your fate.

They will never like us. I want them to be AFRAID of us.

God Bless the 'cowboy' George W. Bush! God Bless and protect our brave sons and daughters in harms way!
6 posted on 02/26/2003 8:39:31 AM PST by appalachian_dweller (Those who sacrifice freedom for security deserve neither.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: zefrog
And besides, who are these "sources" anyway? Sure costs could soar - or some bodyguard could take out Saddam today and costs would be small. I smell nattering nabobs of negativism.
7 posted on 02/26/2003 8:44:38 AM PST by michaelt
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: zefrog
"Medical insurance is expensive, my family seems healthy, I think we will do without."

"The costs of backup disks, fire/water-safe storage, firewalls, etc. add up, I think we will skip keeping duplicate business records, despite the computers routinely crashing and being hacked."

"Sprinkler systems are expensive, I think my night club will just do without."

8 posted on 02/26/2003 8:45:14 AM PST by Diddle E. Squat
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: *war_list
http://www.freerepublic.com/perl/bump-list
9 posted on 02/26/2003 8:47:39 AM PST by Free the USA (Stooge for the Rich)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 8 | View Replies]

To: zefrog
Shouldn't a billion or so be set aside for a warrant on bin Laden's head? Oh, we're supposed to forget about him, aren't we?
10 posted on 02/26/2003 8:49:16 AM PST by warchild9
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: zefrog
I don't think it is unlikely .. Its much more complex than that. They will pay.. trust me!!

Everyone will jump on the bandwagon when this is over.
11 posted on 02/26/2003 9:01:52 AM PST by Vets_Husband_and_Wife
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

Disclaimer: Opinions posted on Free Republic are those of the individual posters and do not necessarily represent the opinion of Free Republic or its management. All materials posted herein are protected by copyright law and the exemption for fair use of copyrighted works.

Free Republic
Browse · Search
News/Activism
Topics · Post Article

FreeRepublic, LLC, PO BOX 9771, FRESNO, CA 93794
FreeRepublic.com is powered by software copyright 2000-2008 John Robinson