Free Republic
Browse · Search
News/Activism
Topics · Post Article

Skip to comments.

Supreme Court Rules For Abortion Protesters In Civil Disobedience Case (RICO)
Associated Press / SFGate ^

Posted on 02/26/2003 7:21:42 AM PST by RCW2001

Edited on 04/13/2004 2:41:53 AM PDT by Jim Robinson. [history]

The Supreme Court ruled Wednesday that a federal racketeering law was improperly used to punish aggressive anti-abortion protesters, a major victory for people who regularly block clinic doors.

The court's 8-0 ruling applies to protests of all sorts, not just at clinics.


(Excerpt) Read more at sfgate.com ...


TOPICS: Breaking News; Front Page News; News/Current Events
KEYWORDS: abortionlist; billofrights; catholiclist; constitutionlist; face; prolife; rico; scotus; scotuslist
Navigation: use the links below to view more comments.
first previous 1-20 ... 261-280281-300301-320 ... 541-546 next last
To: MrLeRoy
if I were to attempt to do to Jane Doe what pregnancy and childbirth do to a woman, she would be legally justified in killing me to prevent it.

False premise. A person can justify killing another person in self defense if they believe they are in danger of being killed themselves. In the vast majority of cases, childbirth and pregnacy do not result in death.

281 posted on 02/26/2003 12:39:46 PM PST by VRWC_minion ( Opinions posted on Free Republic are those of the individual posters and most are right)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 270 | View Replies]

To: Chancellor Palpatine
Your language gives you away,

You use the doublespeak of the Orwellian characters.

"Pregnancy that might be taking place"
is actually a new HUMAN who is likely already formed within a few minutes or hours of the sexual copulation.

Rape kits are not generally not administered until long after the typical conception has already occured.

You think killing an innocent human person if fine when the utility of that killin is high.

That is satanic.




282 posted on 02/26/2003 12:43:10 PM PST by Notwithstanding
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 279 | View Replies]

To: unrestricted
pro-rape advocates

My wife is a rape attempt survivor. I'd thank you not to call anyone on this thread, but particularly me, a "pro-rape advocate."

Your apology is accepted.

283 posted on 02/26/2003 12:45:08 PM PST by Campion
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 280 | View Replies]

To: 2timothy3.16
And sometimes we need to put on that Ephesians full armor of God and fight and stand Jesus against all evil.
284 posted on 02/26/2003 12:45:59 PM PST by Siobhan (+Pray the Divine Mercy Chaplet+)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 144 | View Replies]

To: 2timothy3.16
And sometimes we need to put on that Ephesians full armor of God and fight and stand Jesus against all evil.
285 posted on 02/26/2003 12:47:27 PM PST by Siobhan (+Pray the Divine Mercy Chaplet+)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 144 | View Replies]

To: Notwithstanding; DaughterOfAnIwoJimaVet; Lorianne
Pregnancy that might be taking place" is actually a new HUMAN who is likely already formed within a few minutes or hours of the sexual copulation.

Rape kits are not generally not administered until long after the typical conception has already occured.

You think killing an innocent human person if fine when the utility of that killin is high.

That is satanic.

Wow - now there is a new low - wanting a regime where you can tell freshly raped women that you can't do a rape kit in the hopes they might be pregnant.

Guess you'll do it with a smile on your face, right?

286 posted on 02/26/2003 12:48:16 PM PST by Chancellor Palpatine (those who unilaterally beat their swords into plowshares wind up plowing for those who don't)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 282 | View Replies]

To: unrestricted
...pro-rape advocates ...

Please direct me to a post on this thread that advocates rape.

287 posted on 02/26/2003 12:49:41 PM PST by conservonator
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 280 | View Replies]

To: Chancellor Palpatine
Do you really think that your citing a case representative of less than .0001% of abortions somehow invalidates the SCOTUS decision regarding the efficacy of RICO and the Hobbs Act as regards pro life demonstrations?
288 posted on 02/26/2003 12:51:09 PM PST by jwalsh07
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 279 | View Replies]

To: unrestricted
I never liked the RICO laws much anyway. They were meant for racketeers and not political activists. However, it does not mean that pro-rape advocates can go blow-up Planned Parenthood Clinics with impunity now.

It also doesn't mean that assholes are prohibited from posting at FR but who's counting?

289 posted on 02/26/2003 12:53:47 PM PST by jwalsh07
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 280 | View Replies]

To: Poohbah
I've seen Joe Scheidler's work at first hand. He has a habit of using his size to intimidate people.

Sorry, but that is not true at all.

290 posted on 02/26/2003 12:54:13 PM PST by Siobhan (+Pray the Divine Mercy Chaplet+)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 157 | View Replies]

To: nicmarlo
bumpity bumpity ...
291 posted on 02/26/2003 12:54:54 PM PST by MeekOneGOP (Bu-bye SADdam. You're soon to meet your buddy Stalin in Hades.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 146 | View Replies]

To: RCW2001
Truth has prevailed today.
292 posted on 02/26/2003 12:57:56 PM PST by anniegetyourgun
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: RCW2001
another victory for LIFE!
293 posted on 02/26/2003 1:00:33 PM PST by goodieD
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

Comment #294 Removed by Moderator

To: Chancellor Palpatine
"... in hopes..."

By now it apparent that you truly are satan.
295 posted on 02/26/2003 1:03:58 PM PST by Notwithstanding
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 286 | View Replies]

To: RCW2001
I must add that I always find it puzzling that people actually debate this like it's a political issue. Or people say, well, I don't like the pro-life tactics....HELLO, how far would you be willing to go to save the life of a baby? If you see an already born child being brutally murdered in the street, do you stop and debate about it? We will never win as long as people think there is anything to discuss about babies being murdered. There are only 2 sides to this if you think murdering children is ok.
296 posted on 02/26/2003 1:04:15 PM PST by goodieD
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: Siobhan
I've seen Joe Scheidler's work at first hand. He has a habit of using his size to intimidate people.

Sorry, but that is not true at all.

Change your screen name to Cleopatra.

297 posted on 02/26/2003 1:06:25 PM PST by Poohbah (Beware the fury of a patient man -- John Dryden)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 290 | View Replies]

To: unrestricted
It's not her organs that are in question - it's the baby - a new human being. But as a Libertarian, I know you want to think that new human being is her property and that she is free to kill it.
298 posted on 02/26/2003 1:06:38 PM PST by anniegetyourgun
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 294 | View Replies]

To: VRWC_minion
A person can justify killing another person in self defense if they believe they are in danger of being killed themselves.

The legal standard (at least in Illinois) is death OR "grave bodily harm."

299 posted on 02/26/2003 1:07:09 PM PST by MrLeRoy ("That government is best which governs least.")
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 281 | View Replies]

To: unrestricted
you can do wahtever you want with your reproductive organs

its just the baby inside of them that you cannot deliberately harm

there is a government interest in protecting that life, just like there is an interest in protecting the life of your child within your home who is being threatened by your behavior
300 posted on 02/26/2003 1:07:10 PM PST by Notwithstanding
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 294 | View Replies]


Navigation: use the links below to view more comments.
first previous 1-20 ... 261-280281-300301-320 ... 541-546 next last

Disclaimer: Opinions posted on Free Republic are those of the individual posters and do not necessarily represent the opinion of Free Republic or its management. All materials posted herein are protected by copyright law and the exemption for fair use of copyrighted works.

Free Republic
Browse · Search
News/Activism
Topics · Post Article

FreeRepublic, LLC, PO BOX 9771, FRESNO, CA 93794
FreeRepublic.com is powered by software copyright 2000-2008 John Robinson