Skip to comments.
Iraqi Drones May Target U.S. Cities
FoxNews ^
| Feb. 24, 2003
| FoxNews
Posted on 02/24/2003 1:18:27 PM PST by FairOpinion
Edited on 04/22/2004 12:35:35 AM PDT by Jim Robinson.
[history]
WASHINGTON
(Excerpt) Read more at foxnews.com ...
TOPICS: Breaking News; Foreign Affairs; News/Current Events
KEYWORDS: biological; chemical; cities; defense; drones; dronesus; homeland; iraq; nuclear; terrorism; uav; weapons; wmd
Navigation: use the links below to view more comments.
first previous 1-20 ... 101-120, 121-140, 141-160, 161-165 next last
To: Poohbah
Remember the cult in Japan that tried this?
They were spraying the stuff from rooftops, and the cops came and asked them to stop because people complained about the smell.
Then they drove through town with spray equipment, and made some pets sick..
Finally, in a last ditch effort to actually kill someone, they switched to chemicals and let them off in a subway. That's what it took.
Indeed, these things are much more frightening on paper than they are in real life.
121
posted on
02/24/2003 6:52:41 PM PST
by
Jhoffa_
(Jhoffa_X)
To: FairOpinion
Ummm.... I could call that "realistic". Just take a look at the protesters and the liberals and then tell me that they aren't "as dumb as a box of rocks". In fact I take a box of rocks any day, it's quiet.No, the problem is that you have to assume EVERYONE (including Freepers and those who would be Freepers if they but knew about FR) in America is really that frickin' stupid.
And you'd also have to presume that known effective public health measures like quarantine would not be used.
122
posted on
02/24/2003 6:55:22 PM PST
by
Poohbah
(Beware the fury of a patient man -- John Dryden)
To: Jhoffa_
The theoretical lethality of a weapons system is equal to X times Lo, where Lo is the real-world lethality and X is a variable that represents "ideal conditions" that never exist in reality, PR hype on the part of the manufacturer, FUD (Fear, Uncertainty, Doubt) raised by the Usual Suspects in the mass media, and the gullibility of the general public.
123
posted on
02/24/2003 6:58:15 PM PST
by
Poohbah
(Beware the fury of a patient man -- John Dryden)
To: All
I've heard quite a bit here. One person claiming that an attack helicopter was the best way to drop a UAV.
A. In order to properly disperse a bio/chem payload they would be low flying, slow and predictable. A news helicopter could take one out.
B. A successful bio attack from the air requires the proper weather conditions [temp/wind/humidity/dewpoint] and a very good dispersal pattern. Launch runways or vehicles and probably more that I am unaware of.
Cutting lazy eights over a population center shooting video footage and dispersing bio/chem weapons are two completely different things.
To: Jhoffa_
Haha...I didnt know that.
To: VaBthang4
Oh yes, they were one of the elite cults also..
Very well funded and full of bright people with good PR and government contacts. This was a professional effort all the way.
I think they were called the "AUM" OR "ALUM" or somethign like that and they were led by a blind "shiek" A search on google for the "Tokyo Subway Attack" should give you a bunch more info about them.
They tried bio-weapons forever, to the point of absurdity.. then switched to sarin gas (I think) for the subway attack and that's finally what did the trick.
126
posted on
02/24/2003 7:08:52 PM PST
by
Jhoffa_
(Jhoffa_X)
To: Darkdrake
The whole close/secure the borders thing is put out there by operatives who wish to disillussion marginal or one issue voters into walking away from the GOP in the next elections. Yes, seminar posters have become a real nuisance on FR.
127
posted on
02/24/2003 7:14:35 PM PST
by
MaeWest
(Reporting from behind west coast enemy lines.)
To: Jhoffa_; VaBthang4
Please note that the subway attack is in a near-ideal environment--confined volume, lots of folks...and they still didn't kill very many people, considering how much sarin they deployed.
128
posted on
02/24/2003 7:15:43 PM PST
by
Poohbah
(Beware the fury of a patient man -- John Dryden)
To: Poohbah
Yep.
To: Jhoffa_
This is just complete paranoia, what I am seeing here..
It's amazing. I have never been so ashamed of the US. To be honest, I was wondering why this 'old news' story was being circulated today. There doesn't seem to be any 'new news' in it.
Anyway, it generated an interesting amount of discussion and information. I'm still glad I don't live in a city any more.
To: Cynderbean
- - - -+
131
posted on
02/24/2003 7:32:15 PM PST
by
bwteim
To: Fred Mertz
I just wish people wouldn't over react to these things.. it bothers me.
I can honestly see a big chunck of Americans begging for a police state just to give them a false sense of security over things like this.
I just think it borders on the shameful at times.
Face it, we all have to die of something.. there's no sense in getting all worked up over some nut with an RC plane when he could do the exact same thing in a pickup truck, ultralight, car, truck, subway, train station, shopping mall, SUV, Semi-truck, tanker car, sailboat or segway..
And if he did, the odds are still against him..
It's embarassing, some of this.
132
posted on
02/24/2003 7:32:51 PM PST
by
Jhoffa_
(Jhoffa_X)
Comment #133 Removed by Moderator
To: FairOpinion
Sorry. My bad.
134
posted on
02/24/2003 7:40:42 PM PST
by
Newbomb Turk
("when I was in junior high school, everyone wanted to be a Knight", KNIGHTS RULE!...)
Comment #135 Removed by Moderator
To: FairOpinion
The cities, huh? That's where Saddam's liberal pals live and demonstrate.
To: TemperBay
God, how Bush wants his little war!You're confused. It's Saddam who wants the war. Bush just aims to please him.
To: Cynderbean
138
posted on
02/24/2003 7:52:00 PM PST
by
bwteim
To: fifteendogs
I am sorry if what I am about to say offends you. Am I to understand that the terrorists are about to strike the blue zones?. If so, go for it. Fortunately I live in a red county.
To: MississippiMan
"Even easier - those radio controlled hobbyist planes. Yup, totally workable. "
Say What ? You have to see it to guide it - if it's too small, or you get far enough away from it to be safe, you can't see it either. There are a lot of much easier, much more effective lo-tech ways of doing this.
140
posted on
02/24/2003 8:53:56 PM PST
by
RS
Navigation: use the links below to view more comments.
first previous 1-20 ... 101-120, 121-140, 141-160, 161-165 next last
Disclaimer:
Opinions posted on Free Republic are those of the individual
posters and do not necessarily represent the opinion of Free Republic or its
management. All materials posted herein are protected by copyright law and the
exemption for fair use of copyrighted works.
FreeRepublic.com is powered by software copyright 2000-2008 John Robinson