Skip to comments.
Vehicle Searches To Begin Tomorrow at A-H Intl Airport
local Atlanta news sources
| tnp
Posted on 02/24/2003 5:43:45 AM PST by takenoprisoner
The frontpage of the AJC says that beginning tomorrow the Atlanta PD will be stopping and searching vehicles on approach to the terminals.
TOPICS: Announcements; News/Current Events
KEYWORDS: airportinsecurity; searchandseizures; warrantless
Navigation: use the links below to view more comments.
first 1-20, 21-31 next last
Got "contraband?" Perhaps something personal and private in your suv? Don't leave home for the airport with it. Airport search and seizures have been extended to vehicles dropping folks off at the airport.
To: takenoprisoner
Airport search and seizures have been extended to vehicles dropping folks off at the airport.
I saw local news coverage a week ago about the same at PHI. According to some, I'm one of the Jackboot Thugs crowd when that type of event gives me pause. Philadelphia Police stated very clearly, "...you don't allow a search, you don't come into the airport". Hmmm.
To: takenoprisoner
ANTI-TERROR ÜBER ALLES |
The mythical "freedom versus security" tradeoff is a false choice. The 911 attacks did not occur because Americans have too much freedom. They occurred because terrorists were able to gain access to the cockpits of hijacked aircraft. Instead of retrofitting all commercial aircraft with doors which could actually be used to keep terrorists out of cockpits, Washington created an Orwellian monster named the Transportation Security Administration (TSA) and hired tens of thousands of minimum-wage Gestapo to root through the underwear of airline passengers and arrest/prosecute those who object. Simply setting foot in an airport is now considered to be a terrorist act. The fact that the TSA created a national airport police force without ever addressing the cockpit-door scandal is damning evidence that their mandate has nothing to do with protecting anyone. The true purpose of the TSA is to turn America into a police state.
Airports are the incubators. The statists want to condition us to accept the idea that probable cause is dead and they can search our houses, our hard drives and our persons and demand to see our papers at any time. Airport screeners are the Brown Shirts of our day. |
|
To: FreedomPoster; Travis McGee; E. Pluribus Unum
Ping to #3.
To: E. Pluribus Unum
Outstanding! You get it and so do I. Thanks and a sonic boom for your number 3!
5
posted on
02/24/2003 6:59:53 AM PST
by
takenoprisoner
(stand for freedom or get the helloutta the way)
To: takenoprisoner
What about if you can legaly carry a gun and you happen to have it in the car?
6
posted on
02/24/2003 7:00:15 AM PST
by
OXENinFLA
To: OXENinFLA
You best have your papers handy...and even then who knows what can happen when dealing with a bureacracy hell bent on a police state.
7
posted on
02/24/2003 7:25:20 AM PST
by
takenoprisoner
(stand for freedom or get the helloutta the way)
To: viligantcitizen; OXENinFLA
No arguments, VC. More conditioning of the sheeple to assume their rightful place with respect to our Civil Masters. < /sarcasm>
I want to know the answer that question BIG TIME, Ox. Are they just looking for a guy carrying 100# of Semtex, or am I a criminal for otherwise-legally carrying in my car, just for carrying to the parking lot!? If so, this is an even bigger steaming pile of horse manure.
8
posted on
02/24/2003 7:28:44 AM PST
by
FreedomPoster
(This Space Intentionally Blank)
To: E. Pluribus Unum
From Chapter 24, "The Checkpoint Conference"
The overall checkpoint process was compared to the routine vehicle and body searches now being given to airline passengers and their vehicles in and around airports. Since by and large the public had stopped griping and grown accustomed to these searches, there was no reason to believe that they would not do the same with random highway checkpoints, since after all it was for the greater safety and security of the entire population.
9
posted on
02/24/2003 7:30:01 AM PST
by
Travis McGee
(----- www.EnemiesForeignAndDomestic.com -----)
To: takenoprisoner
Looks like the feds want more airlines to go bankrupt.
10
posted on
02/24/2003 7:31:34 AM PST
by
freeeee
To: Travis McGee
If people would cut back on flying, these rules would go away. Instead, they walk in and put down their dollars like good little lemmings.
11
posted on
02/24/2003 7:32:07 AM PST
by
AppyPappy
(Caesar si viveret, ad remum dareris.)
To: FreedomPoster
I think if any TSA worker sees a gun, he/she won't know what to do and the person w/ the gun would most likely have their gun taken and then tossed in jail.
To: E. Pluribus Unum
If you have nothing to hide...what's the big deal?
(The devil made me say that. No. Really.)
13
posted on
02/24/2003 7:38:19 AM PST
by
Glenn
To: takenoprisoner
This may be interesting...I work for a cutlery service company...I drive a van that carries about 2000 large knives. Butcher Knives, Chef Knives, etc. This Thursday I delivery to two of my regular stops at...you guessed it...a major airport. When I go to deliver there are already parking restrictions in place and often the TSA people (and the national guard before them) will give extra attention to delivery people. The van I drive is a white unmarked panel van...oh the looks I got during the time of the beltway sniper episode. Anyways, does anyone doubt that this weeks delivery to the airport might at least prove interesting? And do you think I might reduce my chances of being searched if I wear a turban?
14
posted on
02/24/2003 7:53:02 AM PST
by
Preech1
("Rain drops on Roses and duct tape on muslims...a few of my favorite things...")
To: takenoprisoner
Back when vehicle searches were "in" I asked the guy why they were searching. He said to check for guns, knives, etc. I asked him why they were not searching the luggage since I could easily have something there and then after pulling away from his "search station" transfer it from the bag to the glove compartment. He shrugged and said he was only doing his job.
He wanted to look in the console and I showed him. He was insulted when I showed him that he missed the "second" compartment within the first but he looked. When he missed the "third" compartment within and I told him, he gave me dirty look and walked away without looking in it.
15
posted on
02/24/2003 7:57:05 AM PST
by
cinFLA
To: GirlShortstop
"...you don't allow a search, you don't come into the airport"
Think about this. The apparent justification for this intrusion is because some Muslim nut might drive a car bomb up to the building. But since he has the chance to drive off with impunity if they opt to randomly search HIS car, he and his pals can keep trying until one of them gets past this gesture at security.
It won't work unless you thoroughly search EVERY car (not that I advocate this.) And even this would send car bombers to some other public space. The only thing special about airports is that the government CAN regulate them all they want.
To: E. Pluribus Unum
Ping to #3.
17
posted on
02/24/2003 8:17:52 AM PST
by
semaj
To: Preech1
..."do you think I might reduce my chances of being searched if I wear a turban?"I'll give you $20 if you go ahead and do it, and let us know the results.
18
posted on
02/24/2003 8:20:33 AM PST
by
semaj
To: semaj
Hmmm...I wonder what the bail would be for disorderly conduct in this case...I don't think $20 will cover it...Maybe I'll put a copy of Registered's "Uncle Sam" on my windshield...
19
posted on
02/24/2003 8:23:27 AM PST
by
Preech1
("Rain drops on Roses and duct tape on muslims...a few of my favorite things...")
To: AppyPappy
It's a comlex situation, and they have many good reasons for this, but the result in the end will be the same: tyranny.
20
posted on
02/24/2003 9:32:11 AM PST
by
Travis McGee
(----- www.EnemiesForeignAndDomestic.com -----)
Navigation: use the links below to view more comments.
first 1-20, 21-31 next last
Disclaimer:
Opinions posted on Free Republic are those of the individual
posters and do not necessarily represent the opinion of Free Republic or its
management. All materials posted herein are protected by copyright law and the
exemption for fair use of copyrighted works.
FreeRepublic.com is powered by software copyright 2000-2008 John Robinson