Free Republic
Browse · Search
News/Activism
Topics · Post Article

Skip to comments.

GROSS MISBEHAVIOR AT TSA
Fiedor Report On the News #303 ^ | 2-23-03 | Doug Fiedor

Posted on 02/22/2003 10:11:07 AM PST by forest

Except for providing an endless amount of humor for late-night monologs, the Transportation Security Administration (TSA) is seeming more useless every day. The Air Marshal program has had major problems from its inception and the idiocy of many airport passenger screeners is almost legendary.

As part of the Homeland Security bill passed by Congress and signed into law by President Bush, TSA (1) was ordered to implement an affirmative program to arm any and all passenger airliner pilots wishing to participate in the program. There were to be no limits on participation. That is, each pilot of a passenger airliner that passes the screening and training will be allowed to carry a firearm on the flight deck. The passenger airlines will not be allowed to 'opt out' of the program. Participation in the program was to be an individual decision that each pilot will make independent of his or her employer.

One problem is that the Transportation Security Administration bureaucrats want to be the big fish in that little security pond. Air Marshals on board an aircraft means that the TSA actually "commands" the aircraft. The "captain" then becomes relegated to being a driver, rather then the senior officer.

Which means, TSA bureaucrats were totally against arming those folks in the cockpit charged with the safe operation commercial aircraft -- and all of the lives of the people aboard.

At this point we might also insert that a great many commercial airline pilots are prior military people. Which means, they already have significant experience with a vast array of weapons, ranging from handguns to fully armed war-planes. Furthermore, a large number of commercial airline pilots have been to war and successfully (obviously) completed their missions.

Even so, TSA bureaucrats are doing everything in their power to ensure that few, if any, commercial airline pilots are armed. A TSA attorney clearly told a member of the Airline Pilots' Security Alliance (APSA), that the TSA intends to make the program so difficult, intimidating and burdensome that no pilot will volunteer. And, so they are.

According to APSA (2), the application demanded by TSA includes a lengthy and probing application and resume'. A government administered psychological exam will be necessary to assure pilots can follow procedures and laws. Then comes a one-on-one "interview" with a TSA psychiatrist to ensure armed pilots will conduct themselves with regard to the safety and security of all aboard the aircraft. Next there will be a probing background investigation in which family, friends, neighbors and coworkers will be interviewed. Of course each pilot wishing to be armed will also need yet another medical evaluation (they already get two a year). And, as part of the program, TSA agents will evaluate pilots-in-training to ensure they have the proper mindset to carry a weapon on the job.

"We're focusing on their ability to be a good federal law enforcement officer in a crisis situation at 48,000 feet," TSA spokesman Robert Johnson told the Associated Press.

Well then, here's a thought: Subject every person in TSA to the same scrutiny. Better yet, every person in federal law enforcement.

Obviously, the TSA has no intention of following the law and quickly arming as many commercial airline pilots as possible. Based on these and other reports, it is becoming clear that the Bush administration should consider summarily dismissing all those in TSA supervisory positions. They have become a lot more trouble than they are worth.

-----------------------------

1. <http://www.tsa.gov>

2. <http://www.secure-skies.org/>

3. And, for your viewing pleasure:

<http://www.whoohoo.net/pilot/index.htm>

   

 END


TOPICS: Activism/Chapters; Constitution/Conservatism; Crime/Corruption; Culture/Society; Editorial; Government
KEYWORDS: airmarshalboss; apsa; armpilotsnow; homesecbill; pilotdriver; pilotsknowbest; prezbush; striptsa; tsanoguns
The Homeland Security bill ordered TSA to arm any and all passenger airliner pilots now. But TSA is throwing up road blocks and should be fired. Pilots will always be the best mentally to command their ship, not some air marshall from nowhere.
1 posted on 02/22/2003 10:11:09 AM PST by forest
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | View Replies]

To: forest
<< Pilots will always be the best .... and the ONLY Aircraft Commanders .... >>

"Air marshalls?"

In command?

Not on my bloody Aeroplane!

Rather, give them bibs and a script.

EG: "Would you like me to have the Purser bring you the Chateaubriand, Captain, Sir -- or the Fillet de Baramundi Australien?"

EG: "Would you like fries with that cheeseburger, fellow-air-marshall, Floyd?
2 posted on 02/22/2003 10:39:01 AM PST by Brian Allen (This above all -- to thine own self be true)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: forest
Pilots almost always had the right to be armed(tho few took advantage of it) under federal law. FAA officials have admitted rescinding the armed-pilot rule ? initiated in response to the 1961 Cuban missile crisis in July 2001, just two months before the Sept. 11 hijackings.

This is not a tin-foil alert. I repeat...this is not a tin-foil alert. ( as he dons his tinfoild hat )
3 posted on 02/22/2003 11:52:10 AM PST by stylin19a (it's cold because it's too hot...- Global Warming-ists explanation for cold wave)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: stylin19a
"FAA officials have admitted rescinding the armed-pilot rule ? initiated in response to the 1961 Cuban missile crisis in July 2001, just two months before the Sept. 11 hijackings."

Got any handy links? I have handy tinfoil. I wear it all the time. It will be in fashion one day.

4 posted on 02/22/2003 3:27:56 PM PST by Arthur Wildfire! March (LIBERTY or DEATH!)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 3 | View Replies]

To: forest
The TSA most definately should hold itself to a higher standard than the pilots. Anyone in that cockpit could have seized a plane at any time. Don't forget the ax in the cockpit. A nut could grab that ax any time he wants and start giving orders to the flight crew.
5 posted on 02/22/2003 3:30:46 PM PST by Arthur Wildfire! March (LIBERTY or DEATH!)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: Arthur Wildfire! March
sure...here's one:

http://vander.hashish.com/articles/911/armedpilotsbanned.html

here's another:

http://www.alpa.org/alpa/DesktopModules/ViewDocument.aspx?DocumentId=332

have fun....I got lost @ the FAA site looking for the applicable regulation.
6 posted on 02/22/2003 4:08:06 PM PST by stylin19a (it's cold because it's too hot...- Global Warming-ists explanation for cold wave)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 4 | View Replies]

Disclaimer: Opinions posted on Free Republic are those of the individual posters and do not necessarily represent the opinion of Free Republic or its management. All materials posted herein are protected by copyright law and the exemption for fair use of copyrighted works.

Free Republic
Browse · Search
News/Activism
Topics · Post Article

FreeRepublic, LLC, PO BOX 9771, FRESNO, CA 93794
FreeRepublic.com is powered by software copyright 2000-2008 John Robinson