Free Republic
Browse · Search
News/Activism
Topics · Post Article

Skip to comments.

Alarm Over Cargo Ships Tracked By Intelligence
Independent (UK) ^ | 2-20-2003 | Nigel Morris/Ben Russell

Posted on 02/19/2003 7:54:38 PM PST by blam

click here to read article


Navigation: use the links below to view more comments.
first 1-2021-28 next last

1 posted on 02/19/2003 7:54:39 PM PST by blam
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | View Replies]

To: blam
What is so difficult about stopping, boarding, and thoroughly searching these ships. Why the hand-wringing? They are, after all, in the middle of the Indian Ocean. They are not going to get to a safer place. We board suspected ships all the time. Hell, Osama himself may be on one of these things, or it might just be a load of rotten oysters. Find out for crying out loud.
2 posted on 02/19/2003 7:59:27 PM PST by Arkinsaw
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: blam
looks like someone might have found something here.....
3 posted on 02/19/2003 8:02:19 PM PST by rface (Ashland, Missouri to Wash. D.C. March 1, 2003 "Supporting our Troops")
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: Arkinsaw
Maybe I'll feel better after I watch Nuclear; Bombing Of Bikini Atoll coming up on the Discover Channel. lol.
4 posted on 02/19/2003 8:05:24 PM PST by blam
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 2 | View Replies]

To: blam
LENGTHY RELATED THREAD HERE:
http://www.freerepublic.com/focus/news/846384/posts
5 posted on 02/19/2003 8:12:08 PM PST by Cindy
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: Arkinsaw
The hand wringing is due to the fact that if indeed these ships are carrying this stuff, that the crew will scuttle the ships to avoid this stuff seeing the light of day and it would present a huge ecological disaster, my bet is they are waiting for a time to do it that will limit the ability for the ships being scuttled.
6 posted on 02/19/2003 8:13:58 PM PST by lexington minuteman 1775
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 2 | View Replies]

To: Cindy
"LENGTHY RELATED THREAD HERE: "

Yup. That's was yesterdays article. I hoped this one may have something new.

7 posted on 02/19/2003 8:14:45 PM PST by blam
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 5 | View Replies]

To: blam
In addition to being the 4th or 5th time this has been posted in the last 24 hours, on the Defense Department briefing this morning Rumsfeld and Myers were ask about this report and said they knew nothing about it and in checking were unable to confirm. Or, something to that effect.
8 posted on 02/19/2003 8:17:55 PM PST by Higgymonster
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

Comment #9 Removed by Moderator

To: blam
Maybe this is just a ruse to get our attention away from other ships actually going somewhere. I think it would be stupid for Saddam to do this, those ships are sitting ducks out there, does he not think were watching this stuff.
10 posted on 02/19/2003 8:24:23 PM PST by Husker24
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: blam
The Navy commander who is directed to inspect the cargos aboard these ships should be given clandestine orders to inform the renegade captains and crews that they will be summarily executed if any cargo is dumped or the ships scuttled. They could also be offered immunity and protection (or even rewards) for cooperating with the inspectors.

If they refuse this offer, it could only mean they ARE INDEED carrying chemical, biological or nuclear weapons material so,
way out there in the middle of the Indian ocean, a sudden nuclear attack could be employed to more-or-less destroy the weapon material on board. It would no doubt release some of the material, but destroy most. A fair deal.

11 posted on 02/19/2003 8:24:52 PM PST by GhostofWCooper
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: Arkinsaw
I think the real concern is the crews might scuttle the ships. If there is something really bad on board, sinking them could cause an unparalleled disaster.
12 posted on 02/19/2003 8:25:30 PM PST by punster
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 2 | View Replies]

To: Arkinsaw
What is so difficult about stopping, boarding, and thoroughly searching these ships.

What's so difficult about having them just disappear entirely.

Rogue wave, don't you know?

13 posted on 02/19/2003 8:36:27 PM PST by E. Pluribus Unum
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 2 | View Replies]

To: blam
Sorta fishy. Three ships wandering around and recently
a French aircraft carrier dispatch and recalled. Any connection?
14 posted on 02/19/2003 8:40:46 PM PST by duckln
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: Higgymonster
My recollection is that Myers just gave a curt "that report can not be confirmed", and when asked the same question again in differents words, gave the same curt answer, eyes darting slightly nervously.

In other words, I think he gave the moral equivalent of "no comment."

Then Rummy stepped in with an aggressive selection of a different question, from a different reporter.

15 posted on 02/19/2003 8:46:03 PM PST by ThePythonicCow (Mooo !!!!)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 8 | View Replies]

To: duckln
Any connection?

Sure! Another case of French surrender.

For sale, one aircraft carrier in fair condition. Hardly used, with road miles. One owner, good papers and instruction manual.

16 posted on 02/19/2003 8:47:29 PM PST by Cold Heat
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 14 | View Replies]

To: duckln
I'm sure the french carrier is travelling in the opposite direction of any ships suspicious ships
17 posted on 02/19/2003 8:48:15 PM PST by way-right-of-center (it's easy to hide when no one is looking)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 14 | View Replies]

To: ThePythonicCow
"In other words, I think he gave the moral equivalent of "no comment." "

Yup. They know which one of the boys on those ships didn't shave on any given day.

18 posted on 02/19/2003 8:53:21 PM PST by blam
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 15 | View Replies]

To: Arkinsaw
I heard today that they think the crew may be under orders to sink the ships if they are going to be boarded...and that an environmental disaster is likely to follow. Hence the caution.

Hussein, obviously, thinks NOTHING of ruining the environment, since his own brain is so completely polluted with evil.

Every time I think of it, I get madder and madder at those idiots who are protesting OUR actions.
19 posted on 02/19/2003 8:58:54 PM PST by ChemistCat (We should have had newer, safer, better, more efficient ships by now, damn it.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 2 | View Replies]

To: lexington minuteman 1775; punster; ChemistCat
Can you all source any legitimate authority, not some eco freak pal, who can explain in detail exactly how scuttling these ships would cause an "ecological disaster"?

I guess a teaspoon of oil dropped in a swimming pool would be considered an "ecological disaster" in this day and time.

Beware of falling prey to the propaganda disseminated by uninformed, illegitimate sources.

20 posted on 02/19/2003 10:28:17 PM PST by VMI70
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 12 | View Replies]


Navigation: use the links below to view more comments.
first 1-2021-28 next last

Disclaimer: Opinions posted on Free Republic are those of the individual posters and do not necessarily represent the opinion of Free Republic or its management. All materials posted herein are protected by copyright law and the exemption for fair use of copyrighted works.

Free Republic
Browse · Search
News/Activism
Topics · Post Article

FreeRepublic, LLC, PO BOX 9771, FRESNO, CA 93794
FreeRepublic.com is powered by software copyright 2000-2008 John Robinson