Free Republic
Browse · Search
News/Activism
Topics · Post Article

Skip to comments.

CIA 'Sabotaged Inspections And Hid Weapons Details' (Iraq)
Independent (UK) ^ | 2-14-2003 | Andrew Buncombe

Posted on 02/13/2003 3:12:32 PM PST by blam

CIA 'sabotaged inspections and hid weapons details'

By Andrew Buncombe in Washington
14 February 2003

Senior democrats have accused the CIA of sabotaging weapons inspections in Iraq by refusing to co-operate fully with the UN and withholding crucial information about Saddam Hussein's arsenal.

Led by Senator Carl Levin, the Democrats accused the CIA of making an assessment that the inspections were unlikely to be a success and then ensuring they would not be. They have accused the CIA director of lying about what information on the suspected location of weapons of mass destruction had been passed on.

The row is of heightened significance given the Bush administration's preparations to argue later today before the UN Security Council that the inspections have run their course and it is now time to move to military action.

France, Russia, Germany and other members of the Security Council are likely to back a counter-proposal to increase the number of inspectors, providing them, if necessary, with the support of armed UN soldiers, as a means of avoiding a military strike.

The accusation of US sabotage emerged from a series of Senate hearings on Capitol Hill. On Tuesday, George Tenet, the CIA director, told the armed services committee panel that the agency had provided the UN inspectors with all the information it had on "high" and "moderate" interest locations inside Iraq – those sites where there was a possibility of finding banned weapons. But Mr Tenet later told a different panel that he had been mistaken and that there were in fact "a handful" of locations the UN inspectors may not have known about.

Senator Levin, from Michigan, responded by saying the CIA director had not been telling the truth. Citing a number of classified letters he had obtained from the agency, he said it was clear the CIA had not shared information with the inspectors about a "large number of sites of significant value".

He said the CIA had told him additional information would be passed to the inspectors within the next few days.

Mr Levin pushed Mr Tenet on whether he thought the inspections had any value. The CIA director replied: "Unless [President Saddam] provides the data to build on, provides the access, provides the unfettered access that he's supposed to, provides us with surveillance capability, there is little chance you're going to find weapons of mass destruction under the rubric he's created inside the country ... The inspectors have been put in a very difficult position by his behaviour.

Mr Levin said later he believed the CIA had, in effect, taken the decision to undermine the inspections. "When they've taken the position that inspections are useless, they are bound to fail," he told The Washington Post. "We have undermined the inspectors."

Mr Levin has raised his concerns with the White House. In a letter to President Bush, the senator asked that America provide the inspectors with as much information as available.

He wrote: "The American people want the inspections to proceed, want the United States to share the information we have with the UN inspectors and want us to obtain United Nations support before military action is used against Iraq."


TOPICS: News/Current Events
KEYWORDS: cia; hid; sabotaged; weapons

1 posted on 02/13/2003 3:12:32 PM PST by blam
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | View Replies]

To: blam
The Independent, UK is a birdcage liner. Andrew Buncombe, the writer, is appropriately named. In the US, "buncombe" means "political claptrap." The UN reports from 1998 noted that Iraq had made efforts both the infiltrate the inspection teams, and to evesdrop on their meetings. The photographs given by Secretary Powell to the UN a week ago included illustrations of the Iraqis sanitizing a site of prohibited chemical weapons, just days before the UN inspectors showed up.

So, far from "sabotaging inspections" by failure to give their full information to the inspectors, CIA and other US sources would have been derelict in their duty had they ooured all their information into those leaky sieves. The only use of this article is to demonstrate the kind of garbage that is inflicted on Europeans in the guise of "news."

Congressman Billybob

Latest column, "Using the Old Noodle," not yet up on UPI, or FR.

2 posted on 02/13/2003 3:21:35 PM PST by Congressman Billybob
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: Congressman Billybob
It's a mad mad world we are living in today.
3 posted on 02/13/2003 3:24:06 PM PST by Irish Eyes
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 2 | View Replies]

To: blam
Blame the boogeyman.
4 posted on 02/13/2003 3:29:43 PM PST by Skwidd (Fire Controlman First Class Extraordinaire)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: blam
read later
5 posted on 02/13/2003 3:57:52 PM PST by LiteKeeper
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: blam
It's so sad to see what a once proud party has done to itself by allowing this hate and blame America 1st crowd to hijack it. If I ever feel the urge coming on me to become a Demorat I will drink the kool aid rather than joing this group of Saddam, Arafat and Bin Laden apologizing fanatics. I knew all of their post 9-11 tears were all a show.
6 posted on 02/13/2003 4:01:42 PM PST by Gkubly
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: blam
They continue to miss the point of inspections. The inspectors are not intended to be detectives, or spies, not this time around.

They have only one limited purpose, and that is to witness the handover of Saddam's weapons. That is it. They are not supposed to be out "inspecting" weapons sites looking for something. They should be in their hotels in Baghdad, or Vienna maybe, awaiting a phonecall from Saddam's minions to schedule the handover of the weapons. Thats it. They should not be out wandering around, they might miss the phonecall.

And after all of these weeks, and no phone call, I think we can be fairly sure that Saddam isn't going to call. They should withdraw their personnel, give them 3 weeks vacation, and they can reconvene in Baghdad to witness the disarmament under the auspices of Governor General Franks.
7 posted on 02/13/2003 4:17:31 PM PST by marron
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: blam
Senator Levin, have you stop taking medication?
8 posted on 02/13/2003 4:21:46 PM PST by A. Morgan
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: blam
Levin is a clymer.
9 posted on 02/13/2003 4:21:58 PM PST by colorado tanker (Moderators are our friends)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: blam
Recall Levin. Recall Landrieu.

The GOP needs to make posters of Levin, Landrieu, Teddy K., the Byrd, Chucky Shumer, and McDermott, oh yeah, and Patty Murray.

Their dangerous pompous arrogance will sicken the "independent" voters away from the DEMs.

10 posted on 02/13/2003 4:25:52 PM PST by joyful1
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: colorado tanker
First off Mr. Lenin THE IRAQI government was BOUND by resolution 1441 to DISCLOSE ALL WEAPONS, IMMEDIATELY and make them available for Inspection! It is NOT the responsibility of the CIA to disclose what they know to the Inspectors.

What a Communist Puke! And he is My Senatwhore(tm)......

11 posted on 02/13/2003 4:29:00 PM PST by Area51
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 9 | View Replies]

To: Area51
Levin has also done everything he can to sabotage the missile defense program.
12 posted on 02/13/2003 4:38:17 PM PST by colorado tanker (Moderators are our friends)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 11 | View Replies]

To: blam
Senator Levin, from Michigan, responded by saying the CIA director had not been telling the truth. Citing a number of classified letters he had obtained from the agency, he said it was clear the CIA had not shared information with the inspectors about a "large number of sites of significant value".

"[A]number of classified letters"? Has Levin actually shared these letters. Or is this a case of him waving sheets of scrap paper and saying "I have a list of 24 -- no, 45 -- No! 64! -- CIA agents who are hiding secrets from the UN"?

13 posted on 02/13/2003 4:53:13 PM PST by Celtjew Libertarian
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: blam
Please correct me if my memory is wrong but I seem to recall that inspectors rejected information from the US because they wanted to appear "unbiased". Is this not true?
14 posted on 02/13/2003 5:04:44 PM PST by rhombus
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: blam
USA Today had an article a month ago or so that I read aloud to my husband. It quoted UN inspectors who said THEY DID NOT WANT intelligence information from the US because Iraq had accused the inspectors in the past of being spies for the US and they didn't want ANY link between the USA and weapons inspectors.
15 posted on 02/13/2003 5:19:56 PM PST by Peach
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: rhombus
That's absolutely 100% correct.
16 posted on 02/13/2003 5:20:30 PM PST by Peach
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 14 | View Replies]

To: rhombus
"Is this not true?"

Don't know.

17 posted on 02/13/2003 5:33:37 PM PST by blam
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 14 | View Replies]

To: blam
It is probably true that the CIA is withholding critical information and for several reasons. First, the CIA has already made clear an institutional bias against going to war with Iraq. In other words, they are actively working in contravention to the President's goal.

Second, releasing the information to the UN would effectively kill (literally) those sources, which would be tantamount to blinding us. Moreover, the CIA correctly characterizes the Senate, and especially Senate Democrats, as being high security risks.

But since the President's goal is (rightfully) war in Iraq, it wouldn't do for the UN inspection team to be to darn successful. In other words, the President's strategy allows him to play the CIA intransigence against itself. They are their own "useful idiots".

In a like way, the President's strategy re France, the UN and even our domestic equivelent (the Democrats) is being played the same way: They are destroying themselves.

All-in-all, not a bad showing for an ol' Texas poker player.

--Boot Hill

18 posted on 02/13/2003 5:40:29 PM PST by Boot Hill
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

Disclaimer: Opinions posted on Free Republic are those of the individual posters and do not necessarily represent the opinion of Free Republic or its management. All materials posted herein are protected by copyright law and the exemption for fair use of copyrighted works.

Free Republic
Browse · Search
News/Activism
Topics · Post Article

FreeRepublic, LLC, PO BOX 9771, FRESNO, CA 93794
FreeRepublic.com is powered by software copyright 2000-2008 John Robinson