Free Republic
Browse · Search
News/Activism
Topics · Post Article


1 posted on 02/13/2003 7:46:25 AM PST by ppaul
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | View Replies ]


Navigation: use the links below to view more comments.
first 1-2021 next last
To: ppaul
"Declare" not Wage.
2 posted on 02/13/2003 7:47:22 AM PST by hobbes1
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies ]

To: ppaul
The representatives joining the suit, all Democrats, are John Conyers of Michigan, Dennis Kucinich of Ohio, James McDermott of Washington, Jose Serrano of New York, Sheila Jackson Lee of Texas and Jesse Jackson Jr. of Illinois.

The Axis of Anti-Americans!

3 posted on 02/13/2003 7:47:58 AM PST by finnman69 (!)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies ]

To: ppaul
We need to file a suit questioning their sanity!
4 posted on 02/13/2003 7:48:26 AM PST by conservativecorner
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies ]

To: rdb3; Khepera; elwoodp; MAKnight; condolinda; mafree; Trueblackman; FRlurker; Teacher317; ...
Idiot alert!

Black conservative ping

If you want on (or off) of my black conservative ping list, please let me know via FREEPmail. (And no, you don't have to be black to be on the list!)

Extra warning: this is a high-volume ping list.

5 posted on 02/13/2003 7:48:37 AM PST by mhking ("The home team Iraqis have won the toss and elected to receive...")
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies ]

To: ppaul
Thought that the courts rulled many years ago that a law didn't have to be a formal declaration of war for congress to give the president war powers? If so they gave Bush that power in the Anti Terrorism bill.
6 posted on 02/13/2003 7:49:42 AM PST by ItsTheMediaStupid
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies ]

To: ppaul
John Conyers of Michigan, Dennis Kucinich of Ohio, James McDermott of Washington, Jose Serrano of New York, Sheila Jackson Lee of Texas and Jesse Jackson Jr. of Illinois.

If memory serves, all six of these chuckleheads were present the day Congress voted to authorize the use of force against Iraq. Perhaps they should all strive to pay more attention.

7 posted on 02/13/2003 7:49:43 AM PST by Redcloak (Jøìn thë Çøålìtìon tø Prëvënt the Åbûsë of Ûnnëçëssårìlÿ Lëngthÿ, Vërbøsë ånd Nønsënsìçål Tåg Lìnës)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies ]

To: ppaul
H.J.RES.114 Text, PDF
Sponsor: Rep Hastert, J. Dennis [IL-14] (introduced 10/2/2002)
Related Bills: H.RES.574H.J.RES.110S.J.RES.45S.J.RES.46
Latest Major Action: 10/16/2002 Became Public Law No: 107-243.
Title: To authorize the use of United States Armed Forces against Iraq.

All Bill Summary & Status Info
8 posted on 02/13/2003 7:51:30 AM PST by Spruce
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies ]

To: ppaul
Isn't this the same "Richardson" that appeared on the talk shows with his Marine son that had attended all private schools before joining the military? If so, his enlistment caused his alma mater to form internal councils as to why this should happen... At the time the Dad was saying how proud he was of his son despite the flak he was taking from his rich friends and neighbors. I could have sworn that was the same Richardson that's now questioning our President's authority.
9 posted on 02/13/2003 7:52:28 AM PST by techdawg2k (Belgianchocolatefactory)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies ]

To: ppaul
This is a war specifically against Iraq, not a military action against terrorism in general. I think that distinction points to a legal requirement to declare war. It would be the first time since the founding of the UN, and in that sense would be peculiarly appropriate.

Any Congress unwilling to make that formal declaration deserves what it gets. Besides, it would be a wonderful opportunity to see little tommy squirm and bring out the Hildabeast to show her for what she is. They would also have to publicly drop that filibuster. :-)
10 posted on 02/13/2003 7:52:49 AM PST by Carry_Okie (Because there are people in power who are truly evil.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies ]

To: ppaul
Somebody call a Wambulance.
11 posted on 02/13/2003 7:53:04 AM PST by Conspiracy Guy (Puke)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies ]

To: ppaul
Where were these clowns during Kosovo? Haiti? Oh...never mind, their MONARCH was in the WH then.
12 posted on 02/13/2003 7:53:08 AM PST by PISANO
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies ]

To: ppaul
Quite frankly, I wouldn't mind seeing a declaration of war vote.
14 posted on 02/13/2003 8:04:34 AM PST by Chi-townChief
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies ]

To: ppaul
He doesn't need Congress. Iraq has violated the terms of the 1991 cease-fire, and we are simply resuming that action.

(We promised to stop kicking his butt if he did X, Y, and Z. He didn't do X, Y, and Z. Therefore, we are not bound to stop kicking his butt.)

17 posted on 02/13/2003 8:14:51 AM PST by Teacher317
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies ]

To: ppaul
"The Founding Fathers did not establish an imperial presidency with war-making power," Conyers said. "The Constitution clearly reserves that for Congress." "The president is not a king," said Charles Richardson

Shame on them for turning this into a political battle. Note the new RAT talking points: "imperial presidency" and "The president is not a king."

Congress should not be a dirty tricks scumbag trial lawyer game either.

19 posted on 02/13/2003 8:17:56 AM PST by RAT Patrol
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies ]

To: ppaul
too bad the dolts don't actually respect and follow the Constitution in the first place
21 posted on 02/13/2003 8:27:17 AM PST by Texas_Jarhead
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies ]

To: ppaul
That Elvis left the building long ago.
23 posted on 02/13/2003 8:28:52 AM PST by Doc_Riley
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies ]

To: ppaul
There is nothing magical about a Declaration of War. The Constitution clearly gives Congress the power to decide when to engage our armed forces.

They have done so. They have authorized the President to use force against Iraq if he deems it necessary.

That is all that is constitutionally required, and this suit is without merit.

24 posted on 02/13/2003 8:33:25 AM PST by Dog Gone
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies ]

To: ppaul
"Suit questions Bush's war powers"

So who filed the suit - Saddam Hussein and Sean Penn?

26 posted on 02/13/2003 8:51:51 AM PST by Enterprise
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies ]

To: ppaul
A bunch of Republicans filed a similar suit against the Clinton administration over Kosovo back in 1999, and my guess is that the ruling here would be the same.

In that suit, the Federal judge pointed out that Congress had passed such a muddy, lame, half-@ssed declaration "in support of the troops" that he couldn't even figure out whether it was a legitimate declaration of war or not.

28 posted on 02/13/2003 9:14:21 AM PST by Alberta's Child
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies ]

To: ppaul; sheltonmac; shuckmaster; 4ConservativeJustices; stainlessbanner
"The Founding Fathers did not establish an imperial presidency with war-making power," Conyers said. "The Constitution clearly reserves that for Congress."

Too late for that Conyers. Where were you in '61 when this happened the first time? Get out of the way. We don't need a Constitution anymore. It's not like anyone in Washington knows what it says!!

29 posted on 02/13/2003 10:16:41 AM PST by billbears (Deo Vindice.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies ]


Navigation: use the links below to view more comments.
first 1-2021 next last

Free Republic
Browse · Search
News/Activism
Topics · Post Article


FreeRepublic, LLC, PO BOX 9771, FRESNO, CA 93794
FreeRepublic.com is powered by software copyright 2000-2008 John Robinson