Kinsey film focus of O'Reilly tonight

Focus on Freedom ^

[steplock]

Kinsey film focus of O'Reilly tonight

The planned filming next month by MGM/United Artists of a feature film about sex revolutionary Alfred Kinsey will be the focus of Fox News Channel's O'Reilly Factor tonight.

O'Reilly will interview Kinsey critic Dr. Judith Reisman, the author of "Kinsey: Crimes & Consequences." A world expert on pornography, Reisman describes Kinsey as "the single most sadistic scientific pedophile propagandist in history."

"The O'Reilly Factor" airs on the Fox News Channel at 8 p.m. Eastern with a repeat broadcast at 11 p.m. Eastern

Why is this important?  Read these related Articles:
Hollywood mag spikes 'pedophile warning'
SUFFER THE CHILDREN

This article comes from Focus on Freedom
http://www.gohotsprings.com/focus/

The URL for this story is:
http://www.gohotsprings.com/focus/modules.php?op=modload&name=News&file=article&sid=255

[bvw]

Hooray for O'Rielly! Get this beast up on the table and dispatch it.

[canuck_conservative]

It is now known that Kinsey was a homosexual who manipulated data to promote his own sexual agenda.

For instance, to determine the incidence of homosexuality in the general population, he studied convicts in a PRISON, and came up with the magical "10%" number, which has been endlessly parroted as gospel ever since by gay activists and the liberal media.

Curiously, in the mid-nineties, a more thorough study by the University of California found that a more accurate number was about 3%. But you don't hear that study publicised very much.

[holyscroller]

I think even 3% is too high. It's such a perversion, it's probably more like .05 (although the way it's being promoted in the schools and by the media, it may be a little higher.

[weegee]

I wouldn't expect this biopic to do well at the Oscars. "Science fiction" generally doesn't appeal to that crowd. If the filmmakers are smart, they'll play it for laughs and let everyone know that he's a quack. Make it more obvious than "The Road To Wellville"; get some kind of a Grouch Marx-like horny bastard running around getting what he can and selling the crowd the Brooklyn Bridge.

[KC_Conspirator]

For instance, to determine the incidence of homosexuality in the general population, he studied convicts in a PRISON, and came up with the magical "10%" number, which has been endlessly parroted as gospel ever since by gay activists and the liberal media.

Are you effin kiddinge me? Is that where the leftists on college campii get that number from?

[Bahbah]

"Reisman describes Kinsey as 'the single most sadistic scientific pedophile propagandist in history.'"

I get the feeling she doesn't think well of him. LOL.

[Tamzee]

I'm so glad you posted this!

This is a very important item for anyone concerned about child sexual exploitation. I've researched Kinsey and have Dr. Reisman's book. Her information is verified by many of the now grown victims and also documentation from the Kinsey institute itself, however, the Kinsey Institute has gone to great lengths to suppress any investigation of Kinsey's activities. Hundreds of children and infants were raped and sexually tortured in Kinsey's "studies", some by the "researchers" and many of them by other pedophiles more than happy to rape children and document this for an enthusiastic Kinsey. This "research" was funded by the Indiana University and the Rockefeller Foundation.

It's tragic enough that this has gotten little attention through the press and academic circles, but it is encouraging current abuse of children. Many pedophiles today use Kinsey's research to justify sexually abusing their own victims and cite the information to each other to validate their "sexual orientation".

Please try to watch this, those of us advocating children's issues have been trying to raise awareness of the situation for years. A film is due out soon that completely whitewashes Kinsey's brutality and promotes him as a scientific pioneer and hero :-(

[canuck_conservative]

I speak the truth, and challenge anyone to prove me wrong.

In fact, the original study was done in 1947; it's hilarious to today seeing homosexual activists desperately claim that THAT study was more accurate & relevant than the mid-90s UC study!

Kinsey scientific "research" was, at best, questionable, and at worst, outright fraud. Do a little digging, and you'll find the unpleasant truths about this quack - the way he forced the Institute's staff into orgies, his unscientific methods, and other bizarre tidbits.

But it may be hard to find, because the media doesn't want to talk about THOSE aspects .....

[SquirrelKing]

An informative book on the subjest is "Degenerate Moderns" by E. Michael Jones.


*WARNING* Not funtime reading.

[sharktrager]

Perhaps she has beaten this drum repeatedly because Kinsey was pathetic.

His "random sample" consisted of prisoners. Prisoners are obviously more likely to participate in homosexual activity.

He used the mask of research to justify sexual molestation of children. His "conclusion" was that the children were not harmed and actually enjoyed being abused.

From a scientific standpoint, his research was laughable. From a moral standpoint it was reprehensible. From a political standpoint he has provided ammunition to those not interested in any facts that interfere with their agenda.

[demosthenes the elder]

oh, yes, yes indeed, that is the genesis of that odiously false statistic. Kinsey surveyed a paltry few thousand prison inmates and applied their reported behavior as if it is exemplary of the general population. In addition, his survey questions themselves were designed to produce false-positive findings in favor of his pro-homosexual agenda.
You really ought to read the full study and full survey.
It is... illuminating, in ways the author did not intend.

[TD911]

After today's events, I would find it hard to believe that O'Reilly is going to do a segment on this crap.

However, who cares what they make a movie about?

Doesn't seem very commercial to me.

BTW did O'Reilly go after Oliver Stone for that fine flick "Fidel?"

No, because it didn't deal with sex, get it!

Welcome to February Sweeps, Jerry Springer would be proud.

[demosthenes the elder]

links go to good articles. thanks.

[KC_Conspirator]

I was always taught by my leftist professors to accept this 10% as gospel and its repeated by in numerous areas of our popular culture. Nevermind that I never accepted this faulty number because it flew in the face of statistics, but I just figured it was a made up number - much like how the left came up with the "3 million homeless" number in the 80's to attack Reagan. So now I figure this joker got this from a prison in the 1940's and then applied this to the general pop? Thats crappy science. I think the APA should revisit their decision in 1973 to reclassify this.

[3catsanadog]

I look forward to O'Reilly tonight. I have Reisman's book, Kinsey: Crimes & Consequences, and I hope she has new information to add.

Kinsey: Crimes & Consequences - a must read for all members of Free Republic.

[3catsanadog]

Her question, "Where are the children of Table 34?" gives me the shivers.