Bill Clinton Recommends U.S. Patience on Iraq

Reuters ^ | February 11, 2003 | Staff

[InvisibleChurch]

Bill Clinton Recommends U.S. Patience on Iraq

Steve-B Recommends Clinton Shut Up And Go Away

Insert "InvisibleChurch" where it reads "Steve-B"

[Washington at Morristown]

Lest we forget: Klintons = Friends of Terrorists

[eureka!]

Re#17 Yep. The Gipper would be proud....

[mewzilla]

This was Clinton's policy after the 1st WTC in '93.... It led us to 911

And, lest we forget, the bombings in Saudia Arabia, the African embassy bombings, the U.S.S. Cole bombing.

Yeah, patience was a virtue, wasn't it, Bubba?

For the terrorists.

[Andy from Beaverton]

And I thought supercalifragilisticexpialidocious was a big word.

[LandofLincoln]

Bill Clinton Recommends U.S. Patience on Iraq

We were patient for eight years

[Wphile]

I suppose we should be patient with Iraq like we were with Al Qaeda eh Bill? Yeah, that did us a lot of good. Due to your "patience" we have 3,000 dead and no twin towers left. STFU bill...you have no business even entering into this debate.

[Ragirl]

You took the words right outta my mouth. With Clinton as president, we waited 8 years and NOTHING!

[Faraday]

How do you define "mixed emotions"?

A headline reading: Terrorists Hit Chappaqua!

[glennaro]

I thank God every day that the adults are in charge in D.C.

[Gritty]

Will this corrupt, failed man ever shut up?

It is because of HIS policies we are in the spot we find ourselves, not only with Saddam but Al Qaeda!

And now he want to sit around Monday morning quarterbacking everything the genuine leaders, statesmen and patriots do?

[Diana Rose]

F**k clinton and the Wh**e he rode in on.

[brydic1]

It would be amusing if not so tragic that the Socialists in Germany, Belgium, France and the US are requesting that we continue to maintain our troops in the Arabian Deserts and on ships at sea costing billions of dollars every week not to mention their discomfort and the eventual decline in morale while the Weasel Alliance continues to play Saddams Game of Hide and Go Seek. It is just criminal if the President allows this to continue. If we are not going to call their bluff, then for heavens sake bring our boys back, kick out all aliens and recently legalized immigrants from muslim countries and let the rest of the world defend themselves.

[swheats]

And we should listen to clinton, why? He's become the paragon of wisdom. I don't think so. His day of reckoning has to be really, really close.

[little-e]

Bubba giving the current administration advice on how to avoid war.......HAHAHAHAHAHA......being a draft-dodger probably classifies him as an expert......

[SAMWolf]

Will someone please flush this turd!!!

Just GO AWAY!!!

[ampat]

After hearing clinton, we should attaak today.

[Marines981]

He didn't have patience with Monica.

[Quix]

PERHAPS THIS IS A LOONEY QUESTION . . . CERTAINLY MANY HEREON WILL THINK SO . . . HOWSOMEVER . . .

ASSUME

that as some had visions/dreams of . . .

Bush found on his desk after inauguration abundant evidence that 'it was all over but the shouting' . . . not clear what--but implications are . . . the China thing--surrender there to in a tech sense at least. . . but seemingly reading slightly between the lines--that it was all arranged for the UN to take over the USA in the midst of a WWII with attacks from China, Russia et al.

Anyway--regardless of the scenario--let's ASSUME a scenario of some absolutely daunting proportions in terms of the Globalist Government Tyranny looming . . .

ASSUME

That Bush is hogtied to do much about it and stay alive.

ASSUME

the stakes are virtually incalulable they are so awesome.

ASSUME

that Bush has evidence that the WWIII thing IS SCHEDULED but at a significantly later date--say a few years from now as some predictions would hint strongly at.

WOULD IT MAKE *ANY* LOGICAL SENSE GIVEN ALL THE ABOVE. . .

for Bush to want to maybe kill a couple or more birds with one stone . . . get Iraq or make a good effort at it--AND if the others insist on WWIII therefrom, they will have to do it when they are less well prepared for it and more vulnerable to our abilities.

I don't know that I think this is really the case. But I wonder about it. As a brainstorming exercise . . . scenario . . . it seems somewhat plausible.

OK, Flame away.