Free Republic
Browse · Search
News/Activism
Topics · Post Article

Skip to comments.

Southern N.M. facility might have information on Columbia
The Daily Times | 02-05-03 | AP (unknown)

Posted on 02/05/2003 12:38:34 PM PST by 1ofmanyfree

Southern N.M. facility might have information on Columbia

WHITE SANDS MISSILE RANGE (AP) — Monitoring systems at the White Sands Test Facility near Las Cruces could contain information about Saturday’s Columbia space shuttle disaster. The facility includes NASA’s Tracking and Data Relay Satellite System, which records and transmits all data sent from space shuttles to the Johnson Space Center in Houston. Ron D. Dittemore. shuttle program manager for the National Aeronautics and Space Administration, said Monday from Houston that he would send a team to White Sands to try to extract extra information. ‘it might just be that there’s a few more seconds on that equipment than was received at Johnson.” said Steve Nesbitt. a NASA spokesman. ‘We’re looking for every scrap of informa-tion from every extra second of data that we can get.” When a space shuttle is in the air, it continuously trans-mits data from its critical systems to two satellites orbiting on opposite sides of the Earth. Those satellites transmit the data directly to White Sands, which relays it to the Johnson control center. ‘Our satellites collect all the data, and we save all of that on tape here,” said Jim Gavura, director of the White Sands station. “If there is a communications outage at any tune, we always save that, and that data is avail-able.” Gavura said he wasn’t sure the station had received any-thing that wasn’t sent to Houston, but he will help NASA examine the tapes. “They don’t want to leave anything (unchecked) that might have a clue as to what happened,” he said. NASA officials also are examining a photo taken by the Starfire Optical Range at Kirtland Air Force Base in Albuquerque as the Columbia passed over New Mexico before it broke up at 200,000 feet. “We did take a photograph of it on its way in,” said Rich Garcia, spokesman for the Air Force Base research labo-ratory. The picture has been turned over to NASA, Garcia said. Air Force and NASA offi-cials would not comment on what the picture showed or whether it would help the Investigation. The commander of the Air Force Safety Center at Kirt-land is also involved in the investigation. Maj. Gen. Ken-neth W. Hess is working on a special commission to try to determine what went wrong.


TOPICS: Breaking News; Government; News/Current Events; US: New Mexico
KEYWORDS: columbia; feb12003; sts107
Navigation: use the links below to view more comments.
first 1-2021-24 next last
This AP article ran in our local paper today. I have tried in vane to find a link to the original article on the AP wire and my local paper's online version. Has anyone else seen this report? It is the first report I've heard that mentions these photos.
1 posted on 02/05/2003 12:38:34 PM PST by 1ofmanyfree
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | View Replies]

To: 1ofmanyfree
I found this one: N.M. facility might have information on Columbia in the Carlsbad Current-Argus.
2 posted on 02/05/2003 12:45:40 PM PST by snopercod
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: 1ofmanyfree
They have the data but it would seem they aren't about to share it as yet, if ever. Interesting.......

The very first day it was said that there were 32 seconds of additional data that would easy to access.....suddenly, it's not so easy, or they don't want to reveal what they know.

3 posted on 02/05/2003 12:49:18 PM PST by OldFriend (SUPPORT PRESIDENT BUSH)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: 1ofmanyfree
From the Carlsbad Current Argus:

N.M. facility might have information on Columbia

4 posted on 02/05/2003 12:49:22 PM PST by TankerKC (If all else fails, blame it on a lack of patriotism.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: OldFriend
The very first day it was said that there were 32 seconds of additional data that would easy to access.....suddenly, it's not so easy, or they don't want to reveal what they know.

I believe you are correct..it may be too painful for the families..

5 posted on 02/05/2003 1:18:47 PM PST by RnMomof7 (God Bless America)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 3 | View Replies]

To: OldFriend
It's kinda like your car breaking down. If you have the car in front of you, a mechanic can probably tell you what is wrong in about 5 minutes.

But if you're trying to tell him over the phone, what you saw and heard before the car went on the bum, it's pretty hard for him to diagnois it.

And of course, this vehicle is now in a bizillion pieces which doesn't help and "diagnois that" is a little difficult.

6 posted on 02/05/2003 1:22:23 PM PST by Sacajaweau
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 3 | View Replies]

To: TankerKC
Yes I find it interesting that they used this particular array to "photograph" the shuttle. It's usual mission seems to be spectrographic analysis of meteorite trails. See below...

http://neo.jpl.nasa.gov/news/news073.html
http://www.sor.plk.af.mil/SOR/leonids.htm
http://www.sor.plk.af.mil/SOR/
7 posted on 02/05/2003 1:25:20 PM PST by 1ofmanyfree
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 4 | View Replies]

To: OldFriend
it was my understanding that the 32 seconds of extra data were stored on equipment in the shuttle... and apparently, as of yet, that equipment has not been found.
8 posted on 02/05/2003 1:27:09 PM PST by glock rocks (zero one zero one...)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 3 | View Replies]

To: glock rocks
As far as I know, there is no non-volatile buffer of data on the shuttle: All data is sent to Earth directly, or relayed through a satellite and then to Earth as soon as it is acquired. Maximum latency is a couple seconds. All of that data is recorded on Earth on redundant systems - much more reliable than a "black box," and much much more capable of recording massive amounts of data. And that data is also analized in real time, on systems far more powerful than what the shuttle carries on board. I do not think there is any data in a missing piece of equipment.
9 posted on 02/05/2003 1:48:00 PM PST by eno_
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 8 | View Replies]

To: 1ofmanyfree
Unlike the goofy conspiracy thread I just read which stated that the crew had somehow taken a picture of the underside of the left wing while in space, THIS story is credible.

There have been statements made repeatedly that there was more data than that recieved by NASA.

10 posted on 02/05/2003 2:15:40 PM PST by cake_crumb (Without dictators, what reason would we have to keep the UN?)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: eno_; OldFriend
you are correct.

the early cable stories were saying that... (honest... they really, really said that). i think... or maybe my dog told me or something...

anyhow, i did find this:

Data flowed 32 seconds after contact lost

A precious 32 seconds -- that is how long the space shuttle Columbia continued to send data back to Earth after NASA lost contact with the astronauts. On Monday, experts said some of this data might yield clues into the final seconds of the doomed flight.

Ron Dittemore, the space shuttle program manager, said on Monday that reconstructing the data was proving harder than originally thought. Finishing the job, he said, might take another day or so.

The data discovery was made possible because the shuttles have a little-known way of keeping in touch. Space vehicles streaking back to Earth generate a fiery plasma, a cloud of electrically charged particles, on their undersides that blocks radio waves, creating a communications blackout.

But in addition to having communication gear that sends its signals earthward, where they are blocked by the hot plasma, the shuttles have an antenna system that points up. These signals are received by Tracking Data and Relay System Satellites.

One of these high-orbiting satellites received data from Columbia and relayed it to Earth. -- NEW YORK TIMES

...i think this is the white sands data.

11 posted on 02/05/2003 2:32:07 PM PST by glock rocks (zero one zero one...)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 9 | View Replies]

To: glock rocks
Yeah, but like the quote in the article said, all the relayed data is also sent to Earth stations and then to NASA.

It is recorded in multiple places.

"Reconstructing" sounds like "We want to look at this before anyone else does and have our asses fully covered before anyone else comes to any conclusions."

There might also be some distressing data regarding just how long it took for the crew to burn up. There was an ex-astronaut doing analysis for one of the TV news networks, and he said something along the lines of "Well, you hope there was a breach that made it immediately impossible for the astronauts to survive..." implying he didn't think the end was quite so quick. I think he personally had a pretty good theory about how things would end if they ended that way.
12 posted on 02/05/2003 2:57:30 PM PST by eno_
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 11 | View Replies]

To: eno_
the g's from the tumble and instant breakup would have immediately rendered them unconsious... were talking 12,500 miles per hour here.

12,500 x 5280 = 66,000,000 feet/hr
66,000,000 ft/hr x 1 hr/3600 sec = 18,333 ft/sec

muzzle velocity of high powered rifle is approx 3000 ft/sec.

ever watch hydrafoils racing... they're running along fine, and in an instant there's an explosion of fiberglass and water and the race ends instantly for that driver.

well, try to imagine a ship the size of a house tumbling out of control at a speed that is 6 times that of a bullet.

my guess is that they never knew, God bless em.

13 posted on 02/05/2003 3:51:40 PM PST by glock rocks (i only engineer zeroes and ones)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 12 | View Replies]

To: glock rocks
unconscious.

fonicks are phun.
14 posted on 02/05/2003 3:53:01 PM PST by glock rocks (i only engineer zeroes and ones)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 13 | View Replies]

To: glock rocks
The Starfire Optical range is about 5 or so miles directly west of my house. I must have been under the flight path. A solem thought.
15 posted on 02/05/2003 3:57:16 PM PST by Tijeras_Slim
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 14 | View Replies]

To: Tijeras_Slim
Look for debris in your backyard! Ya never know until you look!
16 posted on 02/05/2003 4:03:23 PM PST by Black Agnes
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 15 | View Replies]

To: Black Agnes
I have. All my neighbors have. And we'll keep an eye out in the national forest too.
17 posted on 02/05/2003 4:05:33 PM PST by Tijeras_Slim
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 16 | View Replies]

To: DoughtyOne
Picture ping.

NASA officials also are examining a photo taken by the Starfire Optical Range at Kirtland Air Force Base in Albuquerque as the Columbia passed over New Mexico before it broke up at 200,000 feet.

“We did take a photograph of it on its way in,” said Rich Garcia, spokesman for the Air Force Base research labo-ratory.

The picture has been turned over to NASA, Garcia said. Air Force and NASA offi-cials would not comment on what the picture showed or whether it would help the Investigation.

18 posted on 02/05/2003 4:12:03 PM PST by csvset
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: glock rocks
Nope, photos were stored for a better look when they arrived home. The computer data, 32 seconds, is stored at White Sands at this time.
19 posted on 02/05/2003 5:40:46 PM PST by OldFriend (SUPPORT PRESIDENT BUSH)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 8 | View Replies]

To: Sacajaweau
I just wish Dittemore would stop referring to the retrieved pieces of the shuttle as 'debris'. It hurts to hear that term.
20 posted on 02/05/2003 5:41:53 PM PST by OldFriend (SUPPORT PRESIDENT BUSH)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 6 | View Replies]


Navigation: use the links below to view more comments.
first 1-2021-24 next last

Disclaimer: Opinions posted on Free Republic are those of the individual posters and do not necessarily represent the opinion of Free Republic or its management. All materials posted herein are protected by copyright law and the exemption for fair use of copyrighted works.

Free Republic
Browse · Search
News/Activism
Topics · Post Article

FreeRepublic, LLC, PO BOX 9771, FRESNO, CA 93794
FreeRepublic.com is powered by software copyright 2000-2008 John Robinson