Free Republic
Browse · Search
News/Activism
Topics · Post Article

Skip to comments.

U.S. to join international fusion project
The Washington Times ^ | January 30, 2003

Posted on 01/30/2003 4:24:57 PM PST by Indy Pendance

Edited on 07/12/2004 4:00:37 PM PDT by Jim Robinson. [history]

PRINCETON, N.J., Jan. 30 (UPI) -- The United States will join negotiations to build and operate a major international fusion research project, Energy Secretary Spencer Abraham said Thursday.

Known as ITER -- from the Latin word meaning "the way" -- the project is intended to build on previous fusion concepts involving magnetic containment of high-temperature plasma, a state of matter so hot that even atoms cannot hold together.


(Excerpt) Read more at washtimes.com ...


TOPICS: Business/Economy; Foreign Affairs; Front Page News; Government; News/Current Events
KEYWORDS: energylist; fusion; realscience; techindex
Navigation: use the links below to view more comments.
first 1-2021-28 next last

1 posted on 01/30/2003 4:24:57 PM PST by Indy Pendance
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | View Replies]

To: Indy Pendance
I've been following our fusion program for several years now. including ITER. The reason is that they're at the "burning plasma" stage, which means that they now need to investigate how the plasma behaves when it's over the break-even point--when the energy from the fusion is keeping the plasma heated more than the energy from the electrical grid. That is, more energy coming out than going in. I read a report from some scientists last year and everyone is unanimous; this is the next step in the research chain, and it's absolutely necessary.
2 posted on 01/30/2003 4:28:51 PM PST by Windcatcher
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: Indy Pendance

3 posted on 01/30/2003 4:31:29 PM PST by pabianice
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: Indy Pendance
The next thing you know, we'll be told we can just pop some food into a container and bombard it with some kind of waves, using no gas or heat. Just silly!(/humor)
4 posted on 01/30/2003 4:41:02 PM PST by Mark
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: Windcatcher
Were we not originally in ITER in the early '90s?
5 posted on 01/30/2003 4:54:26 PM PST by CasearianDaoist
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 2 | View Replies]

To: *RealScience; *Energy_List; *tech_index
http://www.freerepublic.com/perl/bump-list
6 posted on 01/30/2003 5:04:33 PM PST by Libertarianize the GOP (Ideas have consequences)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 5 | View Replies]

To: CasearianDaoist
We were, but Congress backed out in 1998. Since then it's undergone something of a redesign, due to some breakthroughs that have been found since then. It was originally going to use a purely (old-style) toroidal design, but now they're looking at newer techniques like the spherical torus. Also, we had a team at Princeton doing our own research which was yielding some terrific results. Now that they're looking into "burning plasma" which by its nature requires a much larger apparatus, it makes sense to join forces with other countries to spread around the cost.
7 posted on 01/30/2003 5:17:00 PM PST by Windcatcher
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 5 | View Replies]

To: Indy Pendance
This is the project the president should have touted in his SOTUS, not the hydrogen car.
8 posted on 01/30/2003 5:17:39 PM PST by Moonman62
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: Windcatcher
the spherical torus

Got a schematic diagram or verbal description of this? I'm okay up to the doughnut shape concept and even the twisted doughnut--cruller.

9 posted on 01/30/2003 5:25:15 PM PST by RightWhale
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 7 | View Replies]

To: RightWhale
Here's Princeton's homepage for the NSTX (National Spherical Torus Experiment):

http://www.pppl.gov/projects/pages/nstx.html

Basically a spherical torus is a sphere, with the center cut out. I'm not a fusion expert, but it seems that changing the aspect ratio makes it a lot more efficient--the ratio of magnetic field strength to plasma temperature/pressure is lower (you don't need as much energy to maintain the plasma pressure).
10 posted on 01/30/2003 5:30:43 PM PST by Windcatcher
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 9 | View Replies]

To: Indy Pendance
U.S. to join international fusion project

Hmmmm...are we joining a new jazz band?

11 posted on 01/30/2003 5:34:09 PM PST by wimpycat (Managed to get through highschool and college without taking Physics)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: Indy Pendance
"Science in the 21st Century is often a global effort," Abraham said. "Time and again, homegrown scientific discoveries turn out to be not so homegrown after all. Often, international cooperation is indispensable to achieving results."

Typical "let somebody else lead the way" globalist doubletalk.

12 posted on 01/30/2003 5:35:22 PM PST by Willie Green (Go Pat Go!!!)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: Windcatcher
I've followed it a little, but probably not as much as you. It's a fascinating concept. (Old college physics)
13 posted on 01/30/2003 5:37:08 PM PST by Indy Pendance (They're not left, they're East)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 2 | View Replies]

To: Moonman62
The hydrogen car concept, I believe, was aimed strictly for the liberals and envirowackos. This is a harder concept to understand.
14 posted on 01/30/2003 5:40:46 PM PST by Indy Pendance (They're not left, they're East)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 8 | View Replies]

To: Windcatcher
Thanks for all the information!
15 posted on 01/30/2003 5:41:24 PM PST by Indy Pendance (They're not left, they're East)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 10 | View Replies]

To: Windcatcher
The cored apple. Thanks. Supposedly I've had enough math to deal with this, so I'll see what I might find in the literature.
16 posted on 01/30/2003 5:43:08 PM PST by RightWhale
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 10 | View Replies]

To: Indy Pendance
I have a Master's in Physics, in 1994, but I made the choice to get out. I had a part-time job as a software developer, and I decided I liked doing that a lot more (it's also turned out to be lucrative). I was TERRIBLE at nuclear physics :)
17 posted on 01/30/2003 5:48:12 PM PST by Windcatcher
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 13 | View Replies]

To: Windcatcher
I liked studying nuclear physics. I agree about the pay in any science field. I'm an engineer and we get the shaft compared to less demanding degrees. I know our chemists do as well. I wish I would have known back then what I know now. The harder the degree, the less pay..... So, I got an MBA to compensate. It helped.
18 posted on 01/30/2003 5:55:38 PM PST by Indy Pendance (They're not left, they're East)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 17 | View Replies]

To: Indy Pendance
"The hydrogen car concept, I believe, was aimed strictly for the liberals and envirowackos. This is a harder concept to understand."

What's so hard to understand? We've all seen Mr.Fusion in action in a Back To The Future movie! The plasma container better be real strong to take a hit, if it's in any car I drive.

19 posted on 01/30/2003 5:55:56 PM PST by roadcat
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 14 | View Replies]

To: Indy Pendance
Go for the less glamorous jobs, like the power utility company. It's for life and the pay is good.
20 posted on 01/30/2003 5:59:02 PM PST by RightWhale
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 18 | View Replies]


Navigation: use the links below to view more comments.
first 1-2021-28 next last

Disclaimer: Opinions posted on Free Republic are those of the individual posters and do not necessarily represent the opinion of Free Republic or its management. All materials posted herein are protected by copyright law and the exemption for fair use of copyrighted works.

Free Republic
Browse · Search
News/Activism
Topics · Post Article

FreeRepublic, LLC, PO BOX 9771, FRESNO, CA 93794
FreeRepublic.com is powered by software copyright 2000-2008 John Robinson