Skip to comments.
U.S. to join international fusion project
The Washington Times ^
| January 30, 2003
Posted on 01/30/2003 4:24:57 PM PST by Indy Pendance
Edited on 07/12/2004 4:00:37 PM PDT by Jim Robinson.
[history]
PRINCETON, N.J., Jan. 30 (UPI) -- The United States will join negotiations to build and operate a major international fusion research project, Energy Secretary Spencer Abraham said Thursday.
Known as ITER -- from the Latin word meaning "the way" -- the project is intended to build on previous fusion concepts involving magnetic containment of high-temperature plasma, a state of matter so hot that even atoms cannot hold together.
(Excerpt) Read more at washtimes.com ...
TOPICS: Business/Economy; Foreign Affairs; Front Page News; Government; News/Current Events
KEYWORDS: energylist; fusion; realscience; techindex
Navigation: use the links below to view more comments.
first 1-20, 21-28 next last
To: Indy Pendance
I've been following our fusion program for several years now. including ITER. The reason is that they're at the "burning plasma" stage, which means that they now need to investigate how the plasma behaves when it's over the break-even point--when the energy from the fusion is keeping the plasma heated more than the energy from the electrical grid. That is, more energy coming out than going in. I read a report from some scientists last year and everyone is unanimous; this is the next step in the research chain, and it's absolutely necessary.
To: Indy Pendance
3
posted on
01/30/2003 4:31:29 PM PST
by
pabianice
To: Indy Pendance
The next thing you know, we'll be told we can just pop some food into a container and bombard it with some kind of waves, using no gas or heat. Just silly!(/humor)
4
posted on
01/30/2003 4:41:02 PM PST
by
Mark
To: Windcatcher
Were we not originally in ITER in the early '90s?
To: *RealScience; *Energy_List; *tech_index
To: CasearianDaoist
We were, but Congress backed out in 1998. Since then it's undergone something of a redesign, due to some breakthroughs that have been found since then. It was originally going to use a purely (old-style) toroidal design, but now they're looking at newer techniques like the spherical torus. Also, we had a team at Princeton doing our own research which was yielding some terrific results. Now that they're looking into "burning plasma" which by its nature requires a much larger apparatus, it makes sense to join forces with other countries to spread around the cost.
To: Indy Pendance
This is the project the president should have touted in his SOTUS, not the hydrogen car.
8
posted on
01/30/2003 5:17:39 PM PST
by
Moonman62
To: Windcatcher
the spherical torus Got a schematic diagram or verbal description of this? I'm okay up to the doughnut shape concept and even the twisted doughnut--cruller.
To: RightWhale
Here's Princeton's homepage for the NSTX (National Spherical Torus Experiment):
http://www.pppl.gov/projects/pages/nstx.html
Basically a spherical torus is a sphere, with the center cut out. I'm not a fusion expert, but it seems that changing the aspect ratio makes it a lot more efficient--the ratio of magnetic field strength to plasma temperature/pressure is lower (you don't need as much energy to maintain the plasma pressure).
To: Indy Pendance
U.S. to join international fusion project Hmmmm...are we joining a new jazz band?
11
posted on
01/30/2003 5:34:09 PM PST
by
wimpycat
(Managed to get through highschool and college without taking Physics)
To: Indy Pendance
"Science in the 21st Century is often a global effort," Abraham said. "Time and again, homegrown scientific discoveries turn out to be not so homegrown after all. Often, international cooperation is indispensable to achieving results."Typical "let somebody else lead the way" globalist doubletalk.
To: Windcatcher
I've followed it a little, but probably not as much as you. It's a fascinating concept. (Old college physics)
13
posted on
01/30/2003 5:37:08 PM PST
by
Indy Pendance
(They're not left, they're East)
To: Moonman62
The hydrogen car concept, I believe, was aimed strictly for the liberals and envirowackos. This is a harder concept to understand.
14
posted on
01/30/2003 5:40:46 PM PST
by
Indy Pendance
(They're not left, they're East)
To: Windcatcher
Thanks for all the information!
15
posted on
01/30/2003 5:41:24 PM PST
by
Indy Pendance
(They're not left, they're East)
To: Windcatcher
The cored apple. Thanks. Supposedly I've had enough math to deal with this, so I'll see what I might find in the literature.
To: Indy Pendance
I have a Master's in Physics, in 1994, but I made the choice to get out. I had a part-time job as a software developer, and I decided I liked doing that a lot more (it's also turned out to be lucrative). I was TERRIBLE at nuclear physics :)
To: Windcatcher
I liked studying nuclear physics. I agree about the pay in any science field. I'm an engineer and we get the shaft compared to less demanding degrees. I know our chemists do as well. I wish I would have known back then what I know now. The harder the degree, the less pay..... So, I got an MBA to compensate. It helped.
18
posted on
01/30/2003 5:55:38 PM PST
by
Indy Pendance
(They're not left, they're East)
To: Indy Pendance
"The hydrogen car concept, I believe, was aimed strictly for the liberals and envirowackos. This is a harder concept to understand." What's so hard to understand? We've all seen Mr.Fusion in action in a Back To The Future movie! The plasma container better be real strong to take a hit, if it's in any car I drive.
19
posted on
01/30/2003 5:55:56 PM PST
by
roadcat
To: Indy Pendance
Go for the less glamorous jobs, like the power utility company. It's for life and the pay is good.
Navigation: use the links below to view more comments.
first 1-20, 21-28 next last
Disclaimer:
Opinions posted on Free Republic are those of the individual
posters and do not necessarily represent the opinion of Free Republic or its
management. All materials posted herein are protected by copyright law and the
exemption for fair use of copyrighted works.
FreeRepublic.com is powered by software copyright 2000-2008 John Robinson