Free Republic
Browse · Search
News/Activism
Topics · Post Article

To: Windcatcher
Were we not originally in ITER in the early '90s?
5 posted on 01/30/2003 4:54:26 PM PST by CasearianDaoist
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 2 | View Replies ]


To: *RealScience; *Energy_List; *tech_index
http://www.freerepublic.com/perl/bump-list
6 posted on 01/30/2003 5:04:33 PM PST by Libertarianize the GOP (Ideas have consequences)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 5 | View Replies ]

To: CasearianDaoist
We were, but Congress backed out in 1998. Since then it's undergone something of a redesign, due to some breakthroughs that have been found since then. It was originally going to use a purely (old-style) toroidal design, but now they're looking at newer techniques like the spherical torus. Also, we had a team at Princeton doing our own research which was yielding some terrific results. Now that they're looking into "burning plasma" which by its nature requires a much larger apparatus, it makes sense to join forces with other countries to spread around the cost.
7 posted on 01/30/2003 5:17:00 PM PST by Windcatcher
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 5 | View Replies ]

Free Republic
Browse · Search
News/Activism
Topics · Post Article


FreeRepublic, LLC, PO BOX 9771, FRESNO, CA 93794
FreeRepublic.com is powered by software copyright 2000-2008 John Robinson