Free Republic
Browse · Search
News/Activism
Topics · Post Article

Skip to comments.

Ads Rushing Out Of Limbaugh Show?
CBS MarketWatch.com ^ | 01/29/2003 | William Spain

Posted on 01/29/2003 9:40:55 PM PST by SierraWasp

Ads rushing out of Limbaugh show? Progressives take aim at radio program's sponsors

By William Spain, CBS.MarketWatch.com Last Update: 12:04 AM ET Jan. 30, 2003

CHICAGO (CBS.MW) - A Rush to the exits?

Though still in its infancy, a letter-writing campaign aimed at advertisers on "The Rush Limbaugh Show," has already claimed a few choice scalps -- and hopes to soon have other marketers saying "ditto."

Kicked off last week on the website of a group called Take Back The Media, the effort is generating a growing buzz among online progressives (or, if you prefer, "liberals") -- along with hundreds of angry e-mails to companies that sponsor what it calls Limbaugh's "hateful chortling and guffawing."

Micheal Stinson, a Vietnam-era veteran, is co-founder of Take Back The Media. Obviously never a Rush fan, Stinson and his cohorts were content to largely ignore the king of reactionary talk radio -- until he weighed in on the recent anti-war protests, calling participants "anti-American," "anti-capitalist" and "communists," among other terms.

"He just went too far," said Stinson. "Don't call me anti-American. I served this country."

When he decided to go after Limbaugh, Stinson said "we were told we would have to nip at his heels, to start by contacting local advertisers." He ignored that advice, however, and posted a list, complete with contact information, of top sponsors.

"Within 18 hours, RadioShack (RSH: news, chart, profile) had folded. Within 36 hours, Amtrak was gone and Bose told us they were no longer advertising on the show," Stinson said.

Oddly, Stinson's group is not only telling the rest of the world which companies advertise on Limbaugh's show but, apparently, even the companies themselves.

In RadioShack's case, the company maintains that it does not buy ads on Limbaugh's show and any that did air were "the result of an "error made by the radio network or local affiliate."

RadioShack, the company continued, "strictly adheres to a policy of not intentionally buying advertising space on programs that might be political or socially controversial or that promote any one individual's agenda or point of view."

Amtrak says the ads aired as part of a complicated barter deal involving, strange but true, the San Francisco Convention and Visitors Bureau. It does not sponsor political shows and "'in the future...will communicate [that] practice to" other partners.

Although Stinson said he has reports of its ads appearing during the show, a spokeswoman for Bose told CBS.MarketWatch that its does not advertise on the program, "and has no intentions of doing so."

Other advertisers targeted by Take Back the Media include Darden Restaurants (DRI: news, chart, profile) Red Lobster chain, Pfizer (PFE: news, chart, profile) AutoZone (AZO: news, chart, profile) and online retailer Overstock.com (OSTK: news, chart, profile) -- none of which would comment.

Limbaugh is syndicated by Premiere Radio Networks, a subsidiary of radio behemoth Clear Channel Communications (CCU: news, chart, profile). While not addressing whether the show had lost any advertisers as a result of the boycott, Premiere issued the following written statement:

"There have been many times in the 15 year history of 'The Rush Limbaugh Program' when national and world events have generated increased listening as well as increased communication with individuals who have opposing points of view," said company president Kraig Kitchin. "The kind of compelling radio that generates opposition also causes Rush Limbaugh's weekly 20 million listeners to tune in that much more and listen longer."

That audience number is likely exaggerated (other estimates put it closer to 15 million) but there is no question that Limbaugh is big, big, big and one of medium's biggest single stars.

So, can a few scrappy liberals really hurt him?

Depends. A lot of radio time is bought pretty much on a commodity basis, with advertisers looking for dayparts and regions rather than specific programming. Many may not even know where their ads appeared until after the fact. And, unless they have given their buyers up-front marching orders to avoid him (already not uncommon), Limbaugh's powerful ratings guarantee a piece of that action. Of course, there are plenty of other options that can deliver similar numbers.

Whether or not the boycott works to any meaningful degree is going to depend on how many more advertisers decide it is easier to switch than fight. According to radio buyers, some companies cave almost instantly in the face of even a little negative feedback while others need to experience a truly sustained and widespread level of complaints before they listen.

Still, they don't have to get them all to make a difference: If enough advertisers put out the word that the show is a forbidden zone -- and they are not rapidly replaced -- the program will lose much of its economic value to local stations and station groups regardless of how well its audience numbers are doing. Of course, the already-loaded Limbaugh is never going to have trouble putting food on the table, but he and his fans could end up in less desirable timeslots or on fewer outlets.

Historically, the boycott approach has a mixed record. One of the most effective boycotts of recent times was against Viacom (VIA: news, chart, profile) unit VH-1's "Music Behind Bars," a program that showcased the jailhouse jams of murderers, rapists and assorted other scum. An outcry from victim's rights groups, law enforcement officials and politicians had advertisers staying away in droves and the cable network quickly pulled the plug on the series. (Viacom is a significant shareholder in MarketWatch.com, the publisher of this report.)

The "Christian" right's attack on "NYPD Blue" in the early 1990s, on the other hand, was a complete failure. It initially scared off some marketers but the program's ratings and demographics were so good that it attracted business from sectors that don't sell to religious nuts anyway -- including movies, beer, cosmetics, designer clothing, etc. And the effort completely fell apart when the first big package-goods company (Unilever (UN: news, chart, profile), if memory serves) jumped in. "Blue" eventually went to become one of the most enduring and profitable shows in Disney (DIS: news, chart, profile) unit ABC's prime-time line-up.

What makes this attempt particularly interesting is that progressives typically eschew ad boycotts both for free speech reasons and because it is a favorite technique of their ideological opponents.

Stinson, however, is unapologetic about tearing a page out of the other team's playbook: "We are going to employ the tactics of those people -- and it's already working. We are hitting some nerves."

William Spain is a reporter for CBS.MarketWatch.com in Chicago.


TOPICS: Business/Economy; Extended News; News/Current Events
KEYWORDS: ccrm; medianews
Navigation: use the links below to view more comments.
first previous 1-20 ... 221-240241-260261-280281-300 next last
To: Captainpaintball
Apparently enough people were outraged by the religious nuts label to convince cbs to edit them out of the article. The link originally posted no longer works, but the edited article is still on the front page and reads:

The "Christian" right's attack on "NYPD Blue" in the early 1990s, on the other hand, was a complete failure. It initially scared off some marketers, but the program's ratings and demographics were so good that it attracted business from sectors that don't expect to sell to those folks anyway -- including movies, beer, cosmetics, designer clothing, etc.

261 posted on 01/30/2003 11:26:27 AM PST by Mudbug
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 28 | View Replies]

To: PLK
Her TV show tanked because of protests before it even started. It was never popular to begin with. Her enemies have had a lot less luck with her radio show, which is popular.
262 posted on 01/30/2003 12:06:18 PM PST by GunRunner
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 153 | View Replies]

To: Mudbug
Excellent. Although I'm still not thrilled with the term "those folks," (imagine that term used for blacks or Muslims) I'm glad they saw the eror of their ways.
263 posted on 01/30/2003 12:40:39 PM PST by Captainpaintball (A crutch may help you walk, but it can never make you run!!!)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 261 | View Replies]

To: Captainpaintball
I have to agree about "those folks." CBS sure didn't put much effort into changing the offensive tone of the rest of the paragraph, but apparantly does draw the line at calling Christians "religious nuts."
264 posted on 01/30/2003 1:58:57 PM PST by Mudbug
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 263 | View Replies]

To: SierraWasp
People may wish to go here, and then post responses to said post here. It's pretty amusing, full of the usual ultra-left claptrap: Rush's show is dying and has been for years, Radio Shack actually cancelled even though they never advertised in the first place, etc etc.

These people are simply not an obstacle to us. They sit and stew in their own smugness, while we roll right over them.

265 posted on 01/30/2003 2:20:04 PM PST by Timesink (I offered her a ring, she gave me the finger)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: All
See the cutesy little whale on his shirt? It's the Leftist version of childrens togs. Kids wear RugRats and SpongeBob stuff, and Leftists wear things with whales and Che and Castro and Hussein and bin Laden. But they naturally outgrow it, of course. They especially gravitate towards StormTrooper leather and rubber goods.
266 posted on 01/30/2003 5:18:20 PM PST by JoJo Gunn
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 265 | View Replies]

To: SierraWasp
Rush is getting the Dr. Laura treatment..It's really too bad for these advertiser's... Maybe they can find a liberal venue that suits them..
267 posted on 01/30/2003 5:48:34 PM PST by hope (In the name of liberalism anti-Americanism is born.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: Timesink
"while we roll right over them."

Well then...

LET'S ROLL!!!

268 posted on 01/30/2003 7:55:37 PM PST by SierraWasp (Like, hey man, SHIFT_HAPPENS!!!)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 265 | View Replies]

To: sierradove
WOW!!!

I like your screen handle!!! Are you northern, central, or southern? Westslope or Eastslope? Are you peaceful or militant? I don't think I've ever encountered a militant dove before.(grin)

269 posted on 01/30/2003 8:00:34 PM PST by SierraWasp (Like, hey man, SHIFT_HAPPENS!!!)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 11 | View Replies]

To: All
I've developed a simple 2 simple click submit mass mailer system that hits both Rush's sponsors that are supporting and another for those that have distanced themselves from him

Simply go here and point and click...it really couldn't be any easier.

-------------------------

270 posted on 01/30/2003 8:23:41 PM PST by The Finman
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 50 | View Replies]

To: The Finman
BIG BUMP

Suggest you start a thread in "Activism" with this, referring to article, eh?
271 posted on 01/30/2003 8:27:34 PM PST by unspun (Radio free America.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 270 | View Replies]

To: The Finman
Ok come on -- you had me going....
272 posted on 01/30/2003 8:30:44 PM PST by unspun (Radio free America.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 270 | View Replies]

To: unspun
Ok come on -- you had me going....

Huh??...all you have to do is follow this link

http://www.ronaldreagan.com/ubb/ultimatebb.php?ubb=get_topic;f=7;t=000141;p=1#000000

Point and click...it will open up your E-mail client (provided that you have one) with a form letter with all of Rush's sponsors (that have E-mail listings) in your "To:" window...

All you have to do is click the "Send" button. These forms were created in "Flash" so your browser will need to have the "Flash" plugin which you can get here if you need it.

Flash Player 6 Plugin

273 posted on 01/30/2003 8:40:10 PM PST by The Finman
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 272 | View Replies]

Comment #274 Removed by Moderator

To: The Finman
I see. I was using Opera! -- which I don't use for email.
275 posted on 01/30/2003 9:54:18 PM PST by unspun (Radio free America.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 273 | View Replies]

To: unspun
I see. I was using Opera! -- which I don't use for email.

Okay, good...I had tested it using both Internet Explorer and Netscape and it worked fine.

It crossed my mind to try it in Opera, but I got distracted before I was able to get around to it.

This is just a simple, but effective technique...in the next day or so, I will have an advanced E-mailer on RonaldReagan.com that will offer multiple form letters so it doesn't look like spam to those recieving it.

-------------------------

276 posted on 01/30/2003 10:14:43 PM PST by The Finman
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 275 | View Replies]

To: sierradove
bttt
277 posted on 01/31/2003 4:19:08 AM PST by TLBSHOW (just a internet liberal; basher that is hated by the leftwing nuts!)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 274 | View Replies]

To: The Finman
Here's another thread to post your link on, comrade:
http://www.freerepublic.com/focus/news/833355/posts
278 posted on 01/31/2003 8:46:28 AM PST by unspun (Internet Free America)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 276 | View Replies]

To: All
bump to the NASA watchers
279 posted on 02/02/2003 2:59:06 PM PST by unspun (. . . . under God . . . . ( * ) .. ( * ) . . . .)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 277 | View Replies]

To: SierraWasp
"They just NEVER STOP!!!" Where is our letter writing campaign?
280 posted on 02/02/2003 3:02:57 PM PST by MissAmericanPie
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]


Navigation: use the links below to view more comments.
first previous 1-20 ... 221-240241-260261-280281-300 next last

Disclaimer: Opinions posted on Free Republic are those of the individual posters and do not necessarily represent the opinion of Free Republic or its management. All materials posted herein are protected by copyright law and the exemption for fair use of copyrighted works.

Free Republic
Browse · Search
News/Activism
Topics · Post Article

FreeRepublic, LLC, PO BOX 9771, FRESNO, CA 93794
FreeRepublic.com is powered by software copyright 2000-2008 John Robinson