Skip to comments.
'Clean Urine' Bill Passes (in Arkansas, of course)
Reuters ^
| 1-28-2003
Posted on 01/28/2003 9:42:21 AM PST by Cagey
click here to read article
Navigation: use the links below to view more comments.
first 1-20, 21-40, 41-60, 61-63 next last
1
posted on
01/28/2003 9:42:21 AM PST
by
Cagey
To: Cagey
So how would they check?
2
posted on
01/28/2003 9:46:26 AM PST
by
OXENinFLA
To: Cagey
Reminds me of that old happy song from Arkansas, "Urine the money."
To: Cagey
Tax dollars at work again.
4
posted on
01/28/2003 9:47:45 AM PST
by
SandfleaCSC
(Yes, I'm bad, but you all knew that anyway)
To: Cagey
I swear, some people will stop at NOTHING to pass a test. (Like one couldn't just quit for awhile.)
Seems like substituting someone else's sample would be more trouble than it's worth, given that you're frisked and monitored during alleged sample-providing.
5
posted on
01/28/2003 9:49:11 AM PST
by
Xenalyte
To: OXENinFLA
Logical considerations don't enter into many legislative decisions.
6
posted on
01/28/2003 9:49:16 AM PST
by
weikel
(Round up the boys from the previous space thread)
To: Cagey
Silly drug warriors and their silly laws... all your fluids are belong to us
To: Lexington Green
Yes, "all your fluids are belong to us," said the Commissar or Urine.
To: OXENinFLA; Cagey
They will make everybody register their urine so that they would be able to track the perp. The previous statement just goes to show you how stupid this is, but just because it's stupid doesn't mean they won't try it.
To: Xenalyte
10
posted on
01/28/2003 9:56:40 AM PST
by
Wolfie
To: Cagey; 1tin_soldier; a-whole-nother-box-of-pandoras; Ahban; Arkansawyer; Arkinsaw; Asphodel; ...
Don't these people have anything worthwhile to do with their time?
..
PING!
To: Cagey
The right of the people to be secure in their persons, houses, papers, and effects, against unreasonable searches and seizures, shall not be violated, and no Warrants shall issue, but upon probable cause, supported by Oath or affirmation, and particularly describing the place to be searched, and the persons or things to be seized.
12
posted on
01/28/2003 9:58:56 AM PST
by
Liberal Classic
(Quemadmoeum gladis nemeinum occidit, occidentis telum est.)
To: henderson field
Doesn't matter. People will still find ways around it. I did.
Let's just set up cameras in everyone's home and then their would be no drug problem at all and everything will be prefect.
To: henderson field
Don't laugh. Some guy in North Carolina (I think) was busted for selling urine.
14
posted on
01/28/2003 9:59:18 AM PST
by
Wolfie
To: Desecrated
Oh my. Grammar surrenders.
To: *Wod_list
16
posted on
01/28/2003 10:08:29 AM PST
by
Free the USA
(Stooge for the Rich)
To: Cagey
Aint that a pisser?
17
posted on
01/28/2003 10:11:04 AM PST
by
blackdog
To: sweetliberty
Don't these people have anything worthwhile to do with their time?
The Arkansas General Assembly? HAHAHAHAHA. Um....no.
18
posted on
01/28/2003 10:12:23 AM PST
by
Arkinsaw
To: Cagey
As a freshman I'm going to get razzed anyway, but this bill just gave them added reason No reason to get pissy about it.
19
posted on
01/28/2003 10:17:01 AM PST
by
steve-b
To: SandfleaCSC
Tax dollars at work again. How so? It just makes lying and cheating on a drug test via substituted urine a crime. It doesn't mandate any enforcement techniques or other costs.
Why the upset? Are you in favor of allowing people to lie and cheat on a drug test?
Navigation: use the links below to view more comments.
first 1-20, 21-40, 41-60, 61-63 next last
Disclaimer:
Opinions posted on Free Republic are those of the individual
posters and do not necessarily represent the opinion of Free Republic or its
management. All materials posted herein are protected by copyright law and the
exemption for fair use of copyrighted works.
FreeRepublic.com is powered by software copyright 2000-2008 John Robinson