Skip to comments.
How Many Gun Laws Are There? Study Disputes 20,000 Number
CNSNews.com ^
| January 24, 2003
| Susan Jones
Posted on 01/26/2003 2:55:58 PM PST by TERMINATTOR
(CNSNews.com) - Why pass more gun laws, when there are 20,000 of them on the books that should be enforced? Many gun owners use that argument in the effort to stop gun-control groups from infringing on their Second Amendment rights.
But gun control advocates are trying to undermine that "20,000 gun laws" argument with a new study that casts doubt on the meaning of the "20,000" number.
A study from the Brookings Institution Center on Urban and Metropolitan Policy counts only 300 "relevant federal and state laws regarding the manufacture, design, sale, purchase, or possession of guns." The key word is "relevant."
The study does not include a tally of local gun laws. In fact, the authors note that since more than 40 states preempt all or most local gun control laws, there's no reason to include local laws in a gun-law tally. It is "irrelevant" to count local laws that are superceded by state laws, the authors said in a press release heralding their study.
In that same press release, the Brookings Institution said the study disputes the 20,000-gun-laws claim, based on a "thorough examination of the number and type" of state and federal gun laws.
"The number of laws per state range from one to 13," the press release said, adding that the most common laws concern mandatory minimum sentencing; dealer background checks; "shall issue" laws for carrying a concealed weapon; dealer licensing; and child protection.
The study's authors are Jon S. Vernick, associate professor and co-director of the Johns Hopkins Center for Gun Policy and Research at the Johns Hopkins School of Public Health; and Lisa M. Hepburn of the Harvard Injury Control Research Center at the Harvard School of Public Health.
'Meaningful laws, not numbers of laws'
"In the future, rather than trying to count the number of gun control laws, we should try to better evaluate the effect of those laws," said Vernick in the press release.
"Since the notion of the United States having more than 20,000 significant gun laws has become such an important point of reference in the ongoing debate over guns in America, we thought that it would be worthwhile to document the meaningful state and federal laws," Vernick added.
According to the Brookings Institution, the reference to 20,000 gun laws first appeared in Congressional testimony in 1965, but no source was given. The number has taken hold in the public consciousness, however. In 1981, the authors note, President Reagan rejected a call for additional gun legislation, saying, "There are today more than 20,000 gun control laws in effect -- federal, state and local -- in the United States."
The Brookings Institution says the study will be released as a chapter in a book called "Evaluating Gun Policy," which it describes as "a collection of articles on the consequences of gun possession and policies." It's due to be released the first week in February.
TOPICS: Constitution/Conservatism; Extended News; Government; News/Current Events
KEYWORDS: banglist; bogusgunstudy; copernicus5
Navigation: use the links below to view more comments.
first 1-20, 21-26 next last
To: *bang_list
bang
2
posted on
01/26/2003 3:00:03 PM PST
by
Mulder
(Guns and chicks rule)
To: Mulder
There is only ONE gun law - The Second Amendment - the rest are tyranny and treason.
The Militia - America's original Homeland Defense - since 1776
To: TERMINATTOR
Brookings produces lies the way Pepsi produces soft drinks.
4
posted on
01/26/2003 3:10:37 PM PST
by
WarSlut
(Sharpton in '04.... the movement starts here)
To: Mulder
"The number of laws per state range from one to 13," This is so low it's just plain stupid.
Since the gun elimination crowd can't argue on the merits they will bicker over the number 20,000. They may be correct. It might just be 19,998 laws.
To: TERMINATTOR
300 gun laws is too many.
To: TERMINATTOR
300 gun laws is too many.
To: Larry Lucido
2 duplicate posts is too many.
To: TERMINATTOR
It is "irrelevant" to count local laws that are superceded by state laws, the authors said in a press release heralding their study. Translation: "The only way we can dispute the 20,000 number is to not count 19,700 local laws by calling them 'irrelevant.'"
To: Larry Lucido
2 duplicate posts is too many.
ROFLOL! Good one.
10
posted on
01/26/2003 3:22:46 PM PST
by
BenR2
((How do you do the tag-line thing, again?))
To: TERMINATTOR
If there are only 300 "relevant", "meaningful" gun laws out of 20,000, then let's have the Brokkings Institution folks standing with the gun rights people in calling for the immediate and total repeal of the remaining 19,700 laws at issue. Anyone who objects to this course of action undermines the claim that these laws are irrelevant or meaningless.
To: E. Pluribus Unum
Translation: "The only way we can dispute the 20,000 number is to not count 19,700 local laws by calling them 'irrelevant.'"
This sounds like it may be pretty close to the truth.
This way, they can begin planning to get the NEXT 20,000 un-Constitutional gun laws passed at ALL levels of Government -- INCLUDING locally!
12
posted on
01/26/2003 3:24:10 PM PST
by
BenR2
((How do you do the tag-line thing, again?))
To: TERMINATTOR
For whatever ( or little ) it's worth, I recall, in days when I had no idea how to link anything, reading a webpage which claimed to actual, total count among all the states plus the Federal government was 23,086.
I can also tell you that I have before me the official ATF "State Laws & Published Ordinances- Firearms," year 2000, 22 edition, and it has 329 pages.
13
posted on
01/26/2003 3:26:36 PM PST
by
backhoe
To: TERMINATTOR
Looks like an outcome based study to me. They determined the outcome they sought, then adjusted the input to achieve the desired results. Commonly referred to as "cheating".
In a poker game in the Old West it could get you tarred and feathered... or worse.
14
posted on
01/26/2003 3:31:28 PM PST
by
Ches
To: TERMINATTOR
However many gun laws there are - most of them are totally ineffectual in controlling either crime or violence. Because the criminal is already not particularly concerned about breaking the law, prohibitions against possession of weapons are meaningless, it is just one more law to break.
Violence arising from rage has little to do with the presence or absence of a sidearm or handgun. The violence will proceed with ou without the discharge of a gun. Just that guns make the encounter somewhat more deadly, but the emotions involved are unchanged.
To: TERMINATTOR; madfly; FITZ; Bill Davis FR; mhking; 68-69TonkinGulfYatchClub; Elkiejg; barker; ...
16
posted on
01/26/2003 3:42:15 PM PST
by
ATOMIC_PUNK
(The Fellowship of Conservatives)
17
posted on
01/26/2003 3:56:35 PM PST
by
ATOMIC_PUNK
(The Fellowship of Conservatives)
To: TERMINATTOR
I think the 20,000 estimate is probably a low count...
The BATF's latest annual "State Laws and Published Ordinances - Firearms, 2001 - 23rd ed" (ATF P 5300.5) is 411 pages of State laws, current as of 2001. The 22nd edition was 330 pages and the 21st edition (1998 laws) was only 202 pages. This is only BATF selected State laws.
To get an "official" measure of the volume of federal AND state laws regarding firearms refer to the BATF web site:
http://www.atf.treas.gov/ or the NRA ILA research library:
http://www.nraila.org/GunLaws.asp
I've found the best source to research local (city/county) laws in California is "The California Rifle and Pistol Assn"
http://www.crpa.org
Finally, for those that want to see how bad it really is in CA, California Dept of Justice, firearms laws:
http://caag.state.ca.us/firearms/
To: backhoe; sauropod; madfly
""official ATF "State Laws & Published Ordinances- Firearms," year 2000, 22 edition, and it has 329 pages."
BH, I wonder if the "THINKERS"{?} at Brookings institute thought of asking the BATF?? Kinda doubt it. Stone cold fact is hard to refute. THANKS!! Peace and love, George.
To: George Frm Br00klyn Park
We only need ONE "gun law"...it's called the Second Amendment to the Constitution of the Unites States of America.
Navigation: use the links below to view more comments.
first 1-20, 21-26 next last
Disclaimer:
Opinions posted on Free Republic are those of the individual
posters and do not necessarily represent the opinion of Free Republic or its
management. All materials posted herein are protected by copyright law and the
exemption for fair use of copyrighted works.
FreeRepublic.com is powered by software copyright 2000-2008 John Robinson