{"People who do this just don't do it once. There's something there. No police officer or anyone else wants to see someone like this out on the streets where they can have contact with children."}
Glad to see the follow-up here. I've been following the Ritter situation and while it seemed as though he received special treatment, it hadn't been explictly stated, that I know of--until now.
Why did the ADA, Cynthia Preiser, work out such a deal for Ritter. Why was it kept from the DA. We know the DA fired Ms.Preiser once he found out.
It might have been just "country club courtesy" operating among movers-and-shakers in the local establishment, but the suspicion remains -- especially since the Assistant DA rather quietly disposed of the case without telling her boss -- that some Shadowy Force came by and put in a "fix." Who could do something like that? Who could talk a career prosecutor into quietly disposing of a case involving a creepy guy who likes little girls... not once, but twice in three months? I think it had to have been spooks... our spooks. I'll bet this was one of those "national security matters" and the Assistant DA got rolled into dropping this by somebody with a big Federal badge. They didn't want Scott Ritter in jail, and they didn't want him taken off the world stage. They were learning something by watching him. |
According to the Colonie PD web site they were granted a DOJ grant in 2000 to start their computer crime unit. Which handled 15 on-line investigations in 2000 and 22 on-line investigations in 2001. Their web site says in more than one place that they would be aggressive with cases involving children and Internet crimes and have "been proactively investigating these kinds of crimes since 1997 and have arrested numerous individuals for trafficing in child pornography and traveling to meet children that they engaged over the Internet".
So, Ritter was arrested in 2001 by a police dept. that professes it's aggressive stance on EXACTLY the type of crime that they arrest Ritter for. Check out their 2001 annual report from the link here. It has the line in it I have in bold print above.
There own web site says they would aggressively persue the type of case they caught Ritter on. Their web site indicates that they intended to be experts in the area of crime Ritter was arrested for! So? Were they are weren't they experts? If they were experts then HOW IN THE HELL did Ritter get off the way he did. If they were not really qualified to do these cases then is that the reaqson why Ritter was able to make the deal? The little police dept. was way over it's head?
I'm not bashing the PD here. I'm positive that they are working their butts off. My choice is that they just caught a real big fish and they just did not have what it took to reel him in. But if that's not the case something is very wrong here Lucy....
Scott Ritter-pedophile. His name should always be hyphenated with the word "pedophile". What's just as sick are the idiots who stand up for him. They are in fact defending pedophilia :
Main Entry: pe·do·phil·ia
Pronunciation: "pE-d&-'fi-lE-&
Function: noun
Etymology: New Latin
Date: 1906
: sexual perversion in which children are the preferred sexual object!
- pe·do·phil·i·ac /-'fi-lE-"ak/ or pe·do·phil·ic /-'fi-lik/ adjective
There was NO teenage girl. It was a adult, playacting. If we are gonna start sending people to jail when a adult playacts the part of a girl, there will be many thesbians and costumed spouses thrown in the gaol.