Free Republic
Browse · Search
News/Activism
Topics · Post Article

Skip to comments.

I went to D.C. and all I got was a peace movement (BARF - except for Patriot Rally ref)
Michigan Daily (U. Michigan) ^ | 1/23/03 | Ari Paul

Posted on 01/24/2003 10:20:22 AM PST by NorCoGOP

WASHINGTON -- The path from the National Mall to the Naval Yard was filled with a marching infantry -- 200,000 strong -- armed with banners, puppets, drums, newspapers and an array of clever pro-peace and anti-Bush chants. Since the Pentagon's top-secret plans to formulate a war on Iraq leaked to the press last year, there have been massive demonstrations across Europe, student peace groups emerging and an overwhelming doubt surrounding the idea of war. A former U.N. weapons inspector became an icon for the anti-war movement and questioning Republicans have taken out newspaper ads urging the president to use proper restraint.

The anti-war movement is no longer just for radicals. Though the sectarians were out in full force Saturday, the dominant vibe was that of a genuine belief that this war is wrong and not just party-line rhetoric. In contrast, the small counter-protest was uniform, whose only point was that all 200,000 of us, as well as the other thousands of protesters in Tokyo and San Francisco that also marched that afternoon, were supporting the terrorists and should all swim to Cuba.

Right, all the World War II, Korea and Vietnam veterans marching for peace, the thousands wielding American flags and several members of Congress were simply just being unpatriotic. And people say that it is the Left that is running out of ideas.

Saturday's demonstration was a pinnacle in a rising opposition to the war in Iraq being mounted by people from all over the world from different political walks of life. The march on Washington was united, and it will only be effective in actually making political change if it remains so. The questions that it is faced with are how to preserve the unity.

THE QUESTION OF ANSWER

The main organizer for this march was the coalition known as Act Now to Stop War and End Racism. Sounds innocent enough, however, a closer look at this organization is frightening. Founded days after Sept. 11, 2001 by former U.S. Attorney General Ramsey Clark, it acts as a front group for a hard-line Stalinist group, the Workers' World Party. Among other outrageous beliefs, the party has expressed support for the genocide under Slobodan Milosevic, the massacre at Tiananmen Square and the tyranny of the current North Korean regime. Like the University's own political cult, the Coalition to Defend Affirmative Action and Defend Equality By Any Means Necessary, it makes any practical and level-headed activist want to a keep safe distance. However, like BAMN, ANSWER is extremely organized and effective in bringing adequate turnout and doing the grunt work that makes events like this actually happen. And like the conflict with BAMN, no alternative organization has as loud a voice.

On Saturday, several student anti-war groups gathered in front of the Supreme Court for a separate march that would later join the rest of the protesters walking towards the Naval Yard. Even though their hearts were in the right place and their consciences were opposed to ANSWER's dogma, their numbers and impact were dwarfed by the intensity of the rally on the mall.

Therefore, it makes more sense for the anti-war movement to stay away from the idiotic and mindless teachings of the Workers' World Party, but utilize their strengths and resources if any alternative network of activists fail to gain the same amount of enthusiasm.

And many activists already believe this. Many of the students in front the Supreme Court agreed that though ANSWER's core ideology is repugnant, as one organizer put it, "solidarity is the most important thing."

RAMSEY'S RETURN

District of Columbia Police Chief Charles Ramsey may still haunt some IMF/World Bank protesters dreams. At the anti-globalization protest last September, under his orders, Washington police hogtied hundreds of activists for several hours, making very little distinction between who was committing a crime and who was lawfully dissenting. And before this Saturday he made it clear to the press that he was ready and willing to do the same, even though there are lawsuits still pending against his department. On Saturday, however, we learned that it was just an idle threat.

Instead of the city streets being lined with riot cops standing shoulder to shoulder with tear gas canisters at the ready, officers stood with about 10 yards between them, initiating little, if any, confrontation with the protesters. The crowd for the most part behaved well, staying within the limits of the protest permit, however, many protesters went out of their way to heckle the policemen. "Pig!" I could hear, "this is a police state." Maybe the young punks would like to think that an anti-war march in Washington is as dangerous as an anti-Allah rally in Riyadh, but we must accept the fact that even though the Bush administration is eroding our civil liberties systematically, we still enjoy an incredible amount of freedom.

But, more importantly, the aggression against non-confrontational police officers is patently inappropriate. One protester peacefully and respectfully explained to one officer why she was against the war. While he disagreed, he peacefully and respectfully explained why. So much for police brutality.

Police violence should be condemned when committed, but such wanton antagonism against this profession alienates those that simply do their job and on a larger scale, alienates a major sector of the working class.

DROP BUSH, NOT BOMBS

As much as Saturday's rally was an anti-war demonstration, it was an anti-Bush demonstration. Many signs contained such thought-out and intelligent criticism of the Bush regime such as "F--- you, Bush" and "Asses of Evil" along with pictures of Defense Secretary Donald Rumsfeld and Vice President Dick Cheney. So much discontent from so many Americans proves that there is an ever-increasing opposition to the policies enacted by the man and administration we the people allegedly elected.

For those of us who bit the bullet and punched Gore in 2000, our explanation was that a Bush victory was so unbelievably frightening that voting for Ralph Nader was just too dangerous. We were right. It was apparent that many at the march recognized that it wasn't simply the U.S. government as a whole that was committing such atrocities; it is Bush who is causing the majority of the problems. Would Al Gore wage war on Iraq? Would he create a Department of Homeland Security? Would he appoint John Ashcroft as attorney general? Meditating on these questions, anyone who still thinks Bush and Gore were the same candidate has a learning disability.

The awful truth is that there is a stark difference between what Bush has in mind for this country and any one of the Democratic candidates. The Democrats are not exactly a party of peace, but because it is unlikely Bush will be impeached, it is imperative for the safety of the rest of the world and for ourselves that the reins of power be wrestled from Bush's hands.


TOPICS: Culture/Society; Editorial; Foreign Affairs; News/Current Events; Politics/Elections
KEYWORDS: dcchapter
Navigation: use the links below to view more comments.
first 1-2021 next last
However, like BAMN, ANSWER is extremely organized and effective in bringing adequate turnout and doing the grunt work that makes events like this actually happen. And like the conflict with BAMN, no alternative organization has as loud a voice.

So, strength of numbers is an EXCUSE to ignore the Stalinist backings of these idiots? I think not...might does not make right, and, in this case, ANSWER doesn't even have might, just presence....

1 posted on 01/24/2003 10:20:22 AM PST by NorCoGOP
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | View Replies]

To: NorCoGOP
In contrast, the small counter-protest was uniform, whose only point was that all 200,000 of us, as well as the other thousands of protesters in Tokyo and San Francisco that also marched that afternoon, were supporting the terrorists and should all swim to Cuba.

Um...no, swim to Iraq. We'll meet you there... listen for the planes.

2 posted on 01/24/2003 10:24:13 AM PST by rhombus
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: NorCoGOP
The path from the National Mall to the Naval Yard was filled with a marching infantry -- 200,000 strong

The most optimistic number that I've heard was 40,000. Most of the news organizations put it between 20-40K, and I believe that the DC police said 20K was high.

To put it into perspective, 70,000 people show up in DC for a Redskins game. The 'Protest for Peace" or whatever it is brought in people from all over the country and still couldn't attract 1/3 of that......

3 posted on 01/24/2003 10:46:41 AM PST by wbill
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: NorCoGOP
This is poor prose, lifeless, windy and overlong. Get help, Ari! A few suggestions:

1. Make war on adjectives. Adjectives are a crutch, there to create the imagery all your other words should be creating but aren't. Lose them.
2. Name names. Who are these questioning (Gaaah!) Republicans? Name one, and provide a quote.

And about that 200,000-strong crowd on the Mall: See your optometrist.

4 posted on 01/24/2003 10:46:44 AM PST by redbaiter
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: NorCoGOP
200,000 strong
Michigan Million Mommie Math?
5 posted on 01/24/2003 10:54:12 AM PST by OneLoyalAmerican ((2) Scott Ritter is a: (A) Useful idiot. (B) Pedophile wannabe. (C) Traitor. (D) All the above.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

Comment #6 Removed by Moderator

To: OneLoyalAmerican
This whole numbers thing started when they stopped releasing #s becuase apparently they (cops) estimated the million man march in the 400,000 but areil statistical images showed it was closer to 800,000 and the organizers got pissed (rightfuly so I guess, though I disagree with the cause) at the #s being reported to the media. So now ANSWER coems in and says 20,000=500,000, bleh
7 posted on 01/24/2003 1:53:59 PM PST by College Repub (http://www.collegehumor.com)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 5 | View Replies]

To: NorCoGOP
The answer is to create a theme park for wanna-be 60's radicals.
Some place where they can congregate and roll in mud, burn bras, wave signs and get stoned.
The fees can be used to provide clinics for STD diseases and litter-patrols.
8 posted on 01/24/2003 7:39:05 PM PST by Arkady
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: NorCoGOP; JamesParmelee; Dave Dilegge; BufordP; ironman; Tolerance Sucks Rocks; leadpenny; ...
Thanks for posting this article. Everybody has to stand up to these protesters - wherever and whenever they have a demonstration. We may change a few minds. One thing for certain... if we don't show up, they will have the press all to themselves and our arguments for military action against Iraq will not be heard.
9 posted on 01/27/2003 10:10:48 AM PST by tgslTakoma (OK guys... so when's Patriots Rally IV gonna be?)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: tgslTakoma
Exactly.
10 posted on 01/27/2003 10:12:52 AM PST by FreeTheHostages
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 9 | View Replies]

To: FreeTheHostages
Swim to Cuba -- I didn't realize it bugged them so much. When you stand with an organization that supports terrorists, how can you not be considered one of them?
11 posted on 01/27/2003 10:52:51 AM PST by Angelwood (Join the DC Chapter at the next Patriots Rally (I'm sure it will be warmer) -- FReep On!)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 10 | View Replies]

To: NorCoGOP
200,000 at the peace "movement"? He must have been counting turds.
12 posted on 01/27/2003 11:12:37 AM PST by BufordP (That equates to 5 poops per protester.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: tgslTakoma
Thanks for the flag.
13 posted on 01/27/2003 11:29:46 AM PST by Bigg Red
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 9 | View Replies]

To: Angelwood
Swim to Cuba

AHAHAHAHAHAHAHAHA!

It's lost on thses lefties that Ry Cooder has to go to Cuba to record with Cuban guitarists. Poor bastards would never be allowed to come to the US.

14 posted on 01/27/2003 1:29:17 PM PST by Jimmy Valentine's brother (Why call it A.N.S.W.E.R. it's Workers World Party)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 11 | View Replies]

To: NorCoGOP
"Right, all the World War II, Korea and Vietnam veterans marching for peace, the thousands wielding American flags and several members of Congress were simply just being unpatriotic."

Yep, that's right.
15 posted on 01/27/2003 1:30:20 PM PST by Monty22
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: NorCoGOP
Ann Arbor...nuff said.
16 posted on 01/27/2003 1:34:55 PM PST by Dan from Michigan (Yippee Kai Aye......)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: wbill
That is really saying something considering how bad the Redskins have been as of late.
17 posted on 01/27/2003 1:39:38 PM PST by wjcsux
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 3 | View Replies]

To: NorCoGOP; tgslTakoma
thousands wielding American flags... ???

Uh, we saw only two (2) stars & stripes that weren't either upside down or defaced amongst the many PLO and anarchist banners. However, there were at least four (4) red COMMUNIST flags replete with their gold hammer and sicle logo! I see the leftists have been reading their Orwell.

18 posted on 01/27/2003 3:19:29 PM PST by Xthe17th (FREE THE STATES. Repudiate the 17th amendment!)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: wjcsux
Well.....70K was just an estimate. :-)

I'm a Panthers fan, and that's about what we get at the games....when they sell out.....which hasn't been very often of late. But I'm sure that the 'Skins attract somewhere in that range.

19 posted on 01/28/2003 5:34:06 AM PST by wbill
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 17 | View Replies]

To: Xthe17th
This is a college newspaper article; perhaps the professors were successful in leading them to believe that the Hammer and Sickle is (or should be) the American flag.
20 posted on 01/28/2003 4:08:41 PM PST by Tolerance Sucks Rocks
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 18 | View Replies]


Navigation: use the links below to view more comments.
first 1-2021 next last

Disclaimer: Opinions posted on Free Republic are those of the individual posters and do not necessarily represent the opinion of Free Republic or its management. All materials posted herein are protected by copyright law and the exemption for fair use of copyrighted works.

Free Republic
Browse · Search
News/Activism
Topics · Post Article

FreeRepublic, LLC, PO BOX 9771, FRESNO, CA 93794
FreeRepublic.com is powered by software copyright 2000-2008 John Robinson