Free Republic
Browse · Search
News/Activism
Topics · Post Article

Skip to comments.

Arrest wasn't first time police had eye on (sexual predator) Ritter
Albany Times Union Newspaper

Posted on 01/21/2003 6:57:20 AM PST by 1Old Pro

click here to read article


Navigation: use the links below to view more comments.
first previous 1-20 ... 81-100101-120121-140141-154 next last
To: gridlock
will you grant him just as much credibility as before this story came out?

Probably not, unfortunately, but the guy was involved in Iraq from the beginning and I'm interested. Especially when the Clinton hacks took him down using the same tactic they used to lable Milosevic as the 'butcher of the Balkans'.

At the Hague 'Tribunal', if the 'media' would cover it, Milosevic has the better case. When it comes to facts, Ritter has the better case. When it comes to priorities, W has the better case.

I'm at this conclusion , sans stories of W being an exalcoholic, or Ritter meeting with an adult seductress.

121 posted on 01/21/2003 11:00:04 AM PST by duckln
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 114 | View Replies]

To: Catspaw
Was it the same ADA in the coke case as in Ritter's case or was it a different one.

I don't know. The story doesn't seem to say whether it was the same ADA.

122 posted on 01/21/2003 11:04:38 AM PST by aristeides
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 101 | View Replies]

To: Republic of Texas
The Iraqis are not stupid. It was the same way in Panama with Ted Kennedy. He was on the committe to handle the canal treaty and was constantly running down to Panama to have discussions with various folks...except it was off at some resort and Panamanian politicans provided younger women to entertain Ted constantly. They probably had cameras in Ted's room and caught every act....so they had the advantage of negotiation when the Americans finally got serious.

My guess is that Ritter did the same thing and they urged him to provide a clean cover for the regime. He complied and thought it would be simple. It got him on CNN, and helped make him a major Iraqi supporter in the media.
123 posted on 01/21/2003 11:29:32 AM PST by pepsionice
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 11 | View Replies]

To: pepsionice
If Ritter was an Iraqi agent all along, and the Iraqis put him up to blasting them in '98, that shows a lot of subtlety.

No, why was it, I wonder, that the inspectors in Iraq were seldom able to surprise the Iraqis?

124 posted on 01/21/2003 12:04:36 PM PST by aristeides
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 123 | View Replies]

To: Boot Hill
I know these events aren't related because the flip was earlier but I'm wondering if the Iraqis could have set him up with a minor and then "grabbed him by the shorthairs" with some photo's. Heck, the Russians used to milk that ploy (not necessarily or exclusively with minors though) like a cow for compromising folks...
125 posted on 01/21/2003 12:29:54 PM PST by Axenolith (Hey Y'all, watch this! Famous last words in the south...)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 68 | View Replies]

To: 1Old Pro
The end of Scott Ritter's nascent political career, thank God.
126 posted on 01/21/2003 12:33:11 PM PST by beckett
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: aristeides
Different, from the article:

Clyne's office was heavily criticized three months before Ritter's arrest after another assistant district attorney agreed to drop crack cocaine charges against a renowned Loudonville surgeon, Dr. Darroch Moores. In that case, the assistant district attorney also failed to inform the district attorney.

127 posted on 01/21/2003 12:36:11 PM PST by rolling_stone
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 122 | View Replies]

To: duckln
" When you can't beat the man's arguments, attack his character"

If Ritter was involved in a vicious custody battle and the ex wife lobbed these accusations,you would have a point.If this only involved the word of a young girl and not an undercover policewoman( and possibly 2 different LE,on separate occasions )you would have a point. If this happened in the recent past,where a set up could be alleged,you would have a point.If Scott was caught in a porno theater,alone,ala Pee Wee,you would have a point.This is not on the same plane as the smear jobs against Justice Thomas and Newt. There are tangibles here that cannot be ignored.If Scott is innocent-he should come forward and lay out all the facts,he should fight for his reputation.He should be as passionate about his reputation, as he is about defending Saddam.
128 posted on 01/21/2003 12:37:48 PM PST by Wild Irish Rogue
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 116 | View Replies]

To: aristeides
The Iraqis have tons of money...they simply bought off one or two inspectors. These inspectors are kinda like the olympic idiots who award the games to cities...if you slip some fool from Liberia $50k...who is on the inspection team...he will call Saddam personally and report the next team location.
129 posted on 01/21/2003 12:41:05 PM PST by pepsionice
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 124 | View Replies]

To: Badabing Badaboom
Only legal in GA where the age of consent is 16.
130 posted on 01/21/2003 12:44:52 PM PST by DeathfromBelow
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 21 | View Replies]

To: gridlock
Given that pedophiles are usually acting as part of a larger pattern, it is the high probability that something much worse

Bingo. An arrest on a first offense is very rare. There will be much more to this before it is over.

131 posted on 01/21/2003 1:03:03 PM PST by eno_
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 41 | View Replies]

To: Nick Danger
Scott Ritter becomes the Pee Wee Herman of the Peace Movement. R.I.P.

I'm not so sure. Hey, we've even got a few foolish FReepers who think that Scotty was set up, got a bum rap, or believe it's no big deal for middle-aged guys to troll the internet looking for underage sex toys to trifle with. The cynic in me says that even with Drudge pushing the story, the liberal mainstream media probably won't put their latest peace and Bush-hating poster boy to the fire. Time will tell.

132 posted on 01/21/2003 1:04:46 PM PST by demnomo
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 110 | View Replies]

To: duckln
Sorry, but it smacks of the Coke can and Clarence Thomas, XXX videos and Bork, campaign workers and Gingrich. When you can't beat the man's arguments, attack his character. Find a fault, or invent one and run with it. Let the accused defend the negative, it works every time, even on FR.

So, basically, what you are trying to tell us is that we are all suffering from a mass delusion and that the charges against Scotty are made up. By whom? The Illuminati? Grey Aliens from Zeti Reticuli? Sorry, Buster, Scotty got caught, not once, but twice, trying to get his pants down in front of a fourteen-year-old girl and then a sixteen-year-old girl. The guy is a perverted nut--as well as a turn-coat traitor who defends and visits Uncle Saddamn. You and your pal Scotty can sue me for saying so!

133 posted on 01/21/2003 1:12:34 PM PST by demnomo
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 116 | View Replies]

To: duckln
Oh, and I throughly enjoy attacking both Scott Ritter's character and those who belive the accusations against him are false! :)
134 posted on 01/21/2003 1:16:39 PM PST by demnomo
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 133 | View Replies]

To: 1Old Pro
William Rivers Pitt has finally hit the big time...

... He's got his very own Tawana Brawley!

I have to wonder what else Ritter is hiding. If his denials on paedophiliac stalking can't be trusted, what can we believe him on?

135 posted on 01/21/2003 1:17:48 PM PST by The KG9 Kid
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: demnomo
trying to get his pants down in front of a fourteen-year-old girl and then a sixteen-year-old girl.

What fourteen, sixteen year old? There wasn't any, only a cop seductress impersonator! The only way to entrap Scotty was to have a 'seductress' call him. Not once but twice, even then they couldn't make a convincing case. These detectives picked Scotty for a sting. Maybe not illegal, but sure smells.

The guy is a perverted nut maybe, but not proven, you could be too.
as well as a turn-coat traitor. If you were the NYT's, he'd have your butt in court. What is really galling is, the man objects, you disaggree, and then proceed to completely vilify the Marines, a onetime lead inspector and father of two. Have you no shame. Geez!

136 posted on 01/21/2003 2:12:19 PM PST by duckln
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 133 | View Replies]

To: Wild Irish Rogue
There are tangibles here that cannot be ignored

In Gingrich's and Thomas's they were not ignored, they filled the press for weeks. In Clintons case also his tryst was fodder for months.

Upshot was that in niether cases, once the smoke cleared, has it substancially effected the positions they take.

You also seem to propose a lot of 'ifs'. To be short, your

.If this only involved the word of a young girl and not an undercover policewoman

I may believe a young girl over a 'phone sex' expert. Where is she?

137 posted on 01/21/2003 2:33:12 PM PST by duckln
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 128 | View Replies]

To: duckln
I have plenty of shame. You and your hero Scott Ritter have none what so ever. Pervert Ritter wasn't trolling the net, nor showing up at fast food joints, to meet an adult cop. He was actively pursuing minor girls to satisfy his perverted lust. Duh!

This is my last post to you. Arguing with fools is not worth my time. You are a fool to believe that Scott Ritter was "entrapped"--not once, but TWICE! Married man Ritter was trolling for underage nookie and got caught. Thank heavens his arrest, counseling and now this news story may have permanently deterred his predatory, despicable behavior. RITTER WAS ACTIVELY LOOKING FOR A VICTIM TO SATISFY HIS LUSTS KNOWING FULL WELL THAT IT WAS IMMORAL AND ILLEGAL!!! I wouldn't want any woman--aged fourteen to fourty+--in a room with such a nutcase. Go ahead. Defend him. Say he was set up by the New World Order. Sing his praises while he visits Saddamn in Bagdad at this very minute.

Ex-Marine. Former Inspector. Father of two. Pah! Ritter is a disgrace to the Marine Corps as well as his family. He deserves scorn on all counts.

138 posted on 01/21/2003 2:37:34 PM PST by demnomo
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 136 | View Replies]

To: demnomo
"He [Ritter] was actively pursuing minor girls to satisfy his perverted lust. Duh!"

I think this says it perfectly. Ritter's credability is shot. A pattern of chasing the underage nookey is prime blackmail material. Want to bet Saddam or someone else has more than a few DVDs of Ritter in action?

139 posted on 01/21/2003 2:47:41 PM PST by Smedley
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 138 | View Replies]

To: duckln
The only way to entrap Scotty was to have a 'seductress' call him.

Not once but twice, even then they couldn't make a convincing case.

You mean to tell me NO ONE has called you to task on these whoppers you're spinning?
140 posted on 01/21/2003 2:49:19 PM PST by _Jim
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 136 | View Replies]


Navigation: use the links below to view more comments.
first previous 1-20 ... 81-100101-120121-140141-154 next last

Disclaimer: Opinions posted on Free Republic are those of the individual posters and do not necessarily represent the opinion of Free Republic or its management. All materials posted herein are protected by copyright law and the exemption for fair use of copyrighted works.

Free Republic
Browse · Search
News/Activism
Topics · Post Article

FreeRepublic, LLC, PO BOX 9771, FRESNO, CA 93794
FreeRepublic.com is powered by software copyright 2000-2008 John Robinson