Free Republic
Browse · Search
News/Activism
Topics · Post Article

To: demnomo
trying to get his pants down in front of a fourteen-year-old girl and then a sixteen-year-old girl.

What fourteen, sixteen year old? There wasn't any, only a cop seductress impersonator! The only way to entrap Scotty was to have a 'seductress' call him. Not once but twice, even then they couldn't make a convincing case. These detectives picked Scotty for a sting. Maybe not illegal, but sure smells.

The guy is a perverted nut maybe, but not proven, you could be too.
as well as a turn-coat traitor. If you were the NYT's, he'd have your butt in court. What is really galling is, the man objects, you disaggree, and then proceed to completely vilify the Marines, a onetime lead inspector and father of two. Have you no shame. Geez!

136 posted on 01/21/2003 2:12:19 PM PST by duckln
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 133 | View Replies ]


To: duckln
I have plenty of shame. You and your hero Scott Ritter have none what so ever. Pervert Ritter wasn't trolling the net, nor showing up at fast food joints, to meet an adult cop. He was actively pursuing minor girls to satisfy his perverted lust. Duh!

This is my last post to you. Arguing with fools is not worth my time. You are a fool to believe that Scott Ritter was "entrapped"--not once, but TWICE! Married man Ritter was trolling for underage nookie and got caught. Thank heavens his arrest, counseling and now this news story may have permanently deterred his predatory, despicable behavior. RITTER WAS ACTIVELY LOOKING FOR A VICTIM TO SATISFY HIS LUSTS KNOWING FULL WELL THAT IT WAS IMMORAL AND ILLEGAL!!! I wouldn't want any woman--aged fourteen to fourty+--in a room with such a nutcase. Go ahead. Defend him. Say he was set up by the New World Order. Sing his praises while he visits Saddamn in Bagdad at this very minute.

Ex-Marine. Former Inspector. Father of two. Pah! Ritter is a disgrace to the Marine Corps as well as his family. He deserves scorn on all counts.

138 posted on 01/21/2003 2:37:34 PM PST by demnomo
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 136 | View Replies ]

To: duckln
The only way to entrap Scotty was to have a 'seductress' call him.

Not once but twice, even then they couldn't make a convincing case.

You mean to tell me NO ONE has called you to task on these whoppers you're spinning?
140 posted on 01/21/2003 2:49:19 PM PST by _Jim
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 136 | View Replies ]

To: duckln
Say why don't you put Cybersex and entrapment into a Google search and see what you come up with.

Here are some court cases and if you have trouble with the legal technicalities skip to the next to last paragraph...be advised good detectives know the rules of the game and can play it well they are pros....of course there sometimes are bad apples but I doubt it in this case.

http://www.albanylawjournal.org/millennium/snyderspeech.html
144 posted on 01/21/2003 3:03:05 PM PST by rolling_stone
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 136 | View Replies ]

Free Republic
Browse · Search
News/Activism
Topics · Post Article


FreeRepublic, LLC, PO BOX 9771, FRESNO, CA 93794
FreeRepublic.com is powered by software copyright 2000-2008 John Robinson