Free Republic
Browse · Search
News/Activism
Topics · Post Article

Skip to comments.

Rape, California-style
Townhall.com ^ | January 13, 2003 | Kathleen Parker

Posted on 01/13/2003 8:55:15 PM PST by LibertarianInExile

I'm going to try to keep this clean, but the recent California Supreme Court ruling that a woman who changes her mind during sexual intercourse qualifies as a rape victim tests one's commitment to decorum.

Yes, you read it right. The 6-1 ruling changes the definition of rape so significantly that a man who doesn't withdraw immediately upon his partner's shift in attitude can go to prison. One young man already has.

A 17-year-old -John Z. -served six months in a juvenile detention facility on a rape conviction following just such an encounter. He and Laura T. were having consensual sex when Laura decided she needed to get home. She didn't say, "Stop." She didn't cry out or struggle.

She merely said, "I should be going now" and "I need to go home," according to her testimony.

Because it reportedly took John Z. a full minute and a half to cease and desist -an act of rare self-control among the primate known as a 17-year-old male -he was convicted of rape. I don't know who was holding the timer during this intimate act. Was the rape victim monitoring her watch's second hand?

With its ruling Monday, the California Supreme Court affirmed John Z.'s conviction. Although Justice Janice Rogers Brown agreed with the rape definition, she dissented on whether the boy had been guilty of rape. She noted that he might have had an "honest and reasonable belief" that the girl didn't waive consent, a defense recognized by California courts.

Honest and reasonable? That sounds right. Given that the girl wanted to have sex, or at least said she did, then proceeded to have sex, and only then said she needed to go home, one could leap to the wild conclusion that the young man may not have divined her intent that he retreat.

I'm sorry, but when did girls get so stupid? In the old days -when girls were apparently both smarter and tougher -a girl who didn't want to have sex didn't have sex. She said no thanks, grabbed her purse and walked out the door. The boy may have been disappointed and frustrated, but he wasn't confused. "No" meant "no."

And "yes" meant yes to the finish line. If you want a guy to stop midway through the first act, pick an older boyfriend. Say fiftyish. Speaking of which, I keep coming back to this: Where's Daddy? Who didn't teach this girl the rules of engagement?

Once upon a time, fathers taught their daughters better. You don't take a boy to bed and then say "no." In a similar vein, as my father taught me, you don't pull a gun on someone unless you intend to kill him. There are certain things you don't kid around with, and hormonally charged teenage boys and loaded guns are among the top two.

I'm not suggesting that girls get what they deserve. So stifle the swoon, sisters. Nor am I suggesting that there aren't times when boys and men fail to listen carefully when girls and women speak. In my vast experience, they mostly pay close attention when food is involved.

But I am prepared to defend males against the sort of insanity that makes them criminals for not being able to read a girl's mind. Who exactly will bear witness to these "he said-she said" debacles? What words will suffice to mean "Stop," if "I need to get home" is enough to convict a boy of rape? What if she'd said, "Oh, gosh, I've got to buy cat food." Would that do? "Clearly my heart wasn't in it, Your Honor. He should have known I meant stop!"

And how quick is quick enough for the man to cease his foul play? A minute? Thirty seconds? The court didn't say.

I hate to be the one to break it to you, fellas, but the gelding of the American male is nearly complete and the message clear: You can do nothing right. As a friend's world-weary 15-year-old son correctly summarized the zeitgeist: "Women good, men bad."

John Z. wasn't guilty of rape; he was guilty of being male. If I were a guy, I'd find another country.


TOPICS: Constitution/Conservatism; Crime/Corruption; Culture/Society; Editorial; Government; Miscellaneous; News/Current Events; Philosophy; US: California
KEYWORDS: california; californication; clinton; pc; rape; sex; womensrights
Navigation: use the links below to view more comments.
first previous 1-2021-4041-6061-62 next last
To: FreeTally
She tried to resist and told him she did not want to have intercourse, but he was too strong and forced his penis into her vagina. The rape terminated when, due to Laura’s struggling, the condom fell off. Laura told Juan that "maybe it’s a sign we shouldn’t be doing this," and he said "fine" and left the room. (Although Juan G. was originally a codefendant, at the close of the victim’s testimony he admitted amended charges of sexual battery (§ 243.4) and unlawful sexual intercourse (§ 261.5, subd. (b)), a misdemeanor.)

Laura testified she "kept . . . pulling up, trying to sit up to get it out . . . [a]nd he grabbed my hips and pushed me back down and then he rolled me back over so I was on my back . . . and . . . kept saying, will you be my girlfriend." Laura "kept like trying to pull away" and told him that "if he really did care about me, he wouldn’t be doing this to me and if he did want a relationship, he should wait and respect that I don’t want to do this."

He rolled her over and continued the sexual intercourse. Laura told him that she needed to go home, but he would not stop. He said, "just give me a minute," and she said, "no, I need to get home." He replied, "give me some time" and she repeated, "no, I have to go home." Defendant did not stop, "[h]e just stayed inside of me and kept like basically forcing it on me."

41 posted on 01/14/2003 11:13:56 AM PST by wimpycat (Down with Kooks and Kookery!)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 38 | View Replies]

To: Chancellor Palpatine
And if you believe that, I feel sorry for you. Your kids will be able to get away with anything(and probably already are).
42 posted on 01/14/2003 11:15:35 AM PST by FreeTally (Is it true that canibals don't eat clowns because they taste funny?)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 39 | View Replies]

To: Chancellor Palpatine
Um, have you ever had a two-year-old in your lap? Even they are strong enough to get off somebody who they are on top of. They bounce and squirm and make you let go. A full grown woman can also slap or punch.

Four or five minutes? He was probably finished by then.

43 posted on 01/14/2003 11:15:47 AM PST by Tall_Texan (Where liberals lead, misery follows.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 39 | View Replies]

To: FreeTally
Ooooh! Let's get personal and start talking rash about each other's children, shall we?

Tell us all about your children, why don't you?
44 posted on 01/14/2003 11:17:16 AM PST by wimpycat (Down with Kooks and Kookery!)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 42 | View Replies]

To: wimpycat
As I went into great detail to explain to you yesrterday, her testimony is put into doubt by the fact that she claims to have been on top of him, against her will, for four to five minutes.

I was not replying to you or the Chancellor; I was just making sure the other readers who were not on the original threads didn't fall for your nonsense.

45 posted on 01/14/2003 11:17:57 AM PST by FreeTally (Is it true that canibals don't eat clowns because they taste funny?)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 41 | View Replies]

To: wimpycat
Ooooh! Let's get personal and start talking rash about each other's children, shall we?

Oh, come on. CP when to great lengths to state that his/her opinion was based upon the fact that he/she was a parent, and that basically my opinion is biased because I am not a parent. I think the totality of the posts CP has made shows that he/she is very gullible if he/she thinks teens dont lie their asses off. CP brought up hi/her family experience, not me, which makes it fair game.

46 posted on 01/14/2003 11:21:12 AM PST by FreeTally (Is it true that canibals don't eat clowns because they taste funny?)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 44 | View Replies]

To: FreeTally
Not only are you a liar, but you're a damned liar.

was not replying to you or the Chancellor; I was just making sure the other readers who were not on the original threads didn't fall for your nonsense.

And if you believe that, I feel sorry for you. Your kids will be able to get away with anything(and probably already are).

So tell us all about your children so we can trash them out like you are doing to other people's.

47 posted on 01/14/2003 11:22:36 AM PST by wimpycat (Down with Kooks and Kookery!)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 45 | View Replies]

To: FreeTally
A poster's children have never been fair game to talk trash about.
48 posted on 01/14/2003 11:24:26 AM PST by wimpycat (Down with Kooks and Kookery!)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 46 | View Replies]

To: FreeTally
Your comments defined you as someone too immature to be a parent, or to have had adequate experience to understand this. The other alternative is that you are simply vicious and unprincipled.
49 posted on 01/14/2003 11:27:28 AM PST by Chancellor Palpatine
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 46 | View Replies]

To: Tall_Texan
A full grown woman can also slap or punch.

Which Laura never did. Nor did she testify that she screamed, yelled, left the room, was afraid, was threatened, told someone else at the party, called the cops....... She did mention enjoying two guys fondling her and admitted to lying back down on the bed and kissing John Z. after he re-entered the room naked, but I guess that's irrelevant because it casts doubt upon her claims.

I admit, when I read the first article without the parts of the trial transcript, I though she may have been raped too. The facts of the case, i.e., what she admits to, just don't jive with her other claims that John Z. denies.

50 posted on 01/14/2003 11:28:03 AM PST by FreeTally (Is it true that canibals don't eat clowns because they taste funny?)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 43 | View Replies]

To: wimpycat
Not only are you a liar, but you're a damned liar.

Please re-read the sequence of posts I made. My #36 and #37 were to the forumn and Tall_Texan, not to you or CP. Once engaged by you in #41, and once disturbed by CP's disingenuous "bolding technique", I responded.

I apologize for not being as clear as I could have been.

51 posted on 01/14/2003 11:33:21 AM PST by FreeTally (Is it true that canibals don't eat clowns because they taste funny?)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 47 | View Replies]

To: LibertarianInExile
California Supreme Court ruling that a woman who changes her mind during sexual intercourse qualifies as a rape victim

Talk about pressure to perform well! ....(for guys, at least).

52 posted on 01/14/2003 11:36:24 AM PST by Mr. Mojo
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: Mark
But don't the NOW ladies say that sex between husband and wife is also rape of the woman?

Yep, although I wouldn't exactly call those hags at NOW 'ladies'. Perhaps just 'female'....although that's a bit of a stretch as well.

53 posted on 01/14/2003 11:58:01 AM PST by Mr. Mojo
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 10 | View Replies]

To: goldstategop
Being a white male and a male at that is an indictable offense in Californistan.

White, Christian, male, heterosexual Republicans are public enemy #1, and will soon be outlawed if the trends in Kali continue.

54 posted on 01/14/2003 12:01:20 PM PST by Mr. Mojo
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 2 | View Replies]

To: LibertarianInExile
I hate to be the one to break it to you, fellas, but the gelding of the American male is nearly complete and the message clear: You can do nothing right.

Ain't that the truth. If you put a woman on a pedestal and try to protect her from the rat race, you're a male chauvinist. If you stay home and do the housework, you're a pansy.

If you work too hard, there is never any time for her. If you don't work enough, you're a good-for-nothing bum.

If she has a boring repetitive job with low pay, this is exploitation. If you have a boring repetitive job with low pay, you should get off your ass and find something better.

If you cry, you're a wimp. If you don't, you're an insensitive bastard.

If you make a decision without consulting her, you're a chauvinist. If she makes a decision without consulting you, she's a "liberated" woman.

If you appreciate the female form and frilly underwear, you're a pervert. If you don't, you're a fruit.

If you try to keep yourself in shape, you're vain. If you don't, you're a slob.

If you buy her flowers, you're after something. If you don't, you're not thoughtful.

If you're proud of your achievements, you're full of yourself. If you don't, you're not ambitious.

If she has a headache, she's tired. If you have a headache, you don't love her anymore.

If you want it too often, you're over sexed. If you don't, you must be seeing someone else.

We fellas just have to realize that there's no winning in this game.

55 posted on 01/14/2003 12:17:30 PM PST by Mr. Mojo
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: LibertarianInExile
If I were a guy, I'd find another country.

Nah, just another state - California is such a joke on SO many fronts!

56 posted on 01/14/2003 12:21:37 PM PST by mil-vet
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: Mr. Mojo
So what is Christian, conservative or Republican about insisting on some ethereal right to "finish" sex?

And please identify what is so Christian or Republican about the conduct of the two guilty young men (one of whom apparently pled) as was outlined in the actual opinion, as opposed to Ms. Parker's blatherings?

57 posted on 01/14/2003 12:36:30 PM PST by Chancellor Palpatine
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 54 | View Replies]

To: mil-vet
California punishes young men who insist on having sex and gang up on a girl who keeps saying no. Do you claim that is bad?
58 posted on 01/14/2003 12:37:59 PM PST by Chancellor Palpatine
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 56 | View Replies]

To: Chancellor Palpatine
Don't put extra words or extra meaning in what I say. It's a sad fact that California is bankrupt both fiscally and, in general, morally. It makes it really tough for those Californians who DO have morals and integrity to live there! I sure as hades wouldn't want to raise MY kids in any part of California I know of (although there might be a few small communities in the "boonies" which aren't so bad)!

Regarding the subject of the article, under NO circumstances is rape anything other than a crime. In this case, however, intercourse began consentually - at that point it was, therefore, NOT rape. Like the article said, there was herculean effort for the guy to quit prior to climax - don't try tell me it was an easy matter to figure out in mid-act that consentual had changed to "oops, this is a mistake", but he did (in spite of the words "no" or "stop" not being uttered, and in spite of no empassioned screaming), and then stopped.

As the proud parent of four daughters, three of whom are happily married with families of their own, and youngest of whom is an award-winning college junior, don't presume to tell me ANYTHING about the rights of women!

59 posted on 01/14/2003 1:16:15 PM PST by mil-vet
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 58 | View Replies]

To: Chancellor Palpatine
"This is from the "FACTS" section of the California opinion - discussed at length yesterday, and which Ms. Parker suspiciously neglected to include"

I agree, that is a lot of information she left out. Sort of changes the whole "feel" of her article. (and the situation)

60 posted on 01/14/2003 1:54:44 PM PST by KineticKitty
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 29 | View Replies]


Navigation: use the links below to view more comments.
first previous 1-2021-4041-6061-62 next last

Disclaimer: Opinions posted on Free Republic are those of the individual posters and do not necessarily represent the opinion of Free Republic or its management. All materials posted herein are protected by copyright law and the exemption for fair use of copyrighted works.

Free Republic
Browse · Search
News/Activism
Topics · Post Article

FreeRepublic, LLC, PO BOX 9771, FRESNO, CA 93794
FreeRepublic.com is powered by software copyright 2000-2008 John Robinson