Free Republic
Browse · Search
News/Activism
Topics · Post Article

Skip to comments.

Stenholm wants to double terms
Abilene Reporter News | January 8,2003 | Tara Copp

Posted on 01/08/2003 8:17:19 AM PST by rockhead

Stenholm wants to double terms By Tara Copp / Reporter-News Washington Bureau January 8, 2003

WASHINGTON — U.S. Rep. Charles Stenholm said he will file legislation to extend House members’ terms from two years to four.

Two months ago, Stenholm survived a nail-biting re-election challenge from Republican Rob Beckham. Stenholm garnered 51 percent of the vote to claim a 13th term, and the close call already has the national Republican Party eyeballing the seat in 2004.

Stenholm said he has been considering filing a bill to expand members’ terms for the last six years, during which he has thrice faced stiff election-year challenges. He said he has always been talked out of filing the legislation because of the perception it would be self-serving.

Pressure from constituents has convinced him otherwise, he said.

"I’ve had enough constituents in the last two campaigns say, ‘Why don’t you go to four-year terms?’" Stenholm said. "I think two-year terms, the costs associated with them — the constant campaigning and the constant need for money-raising — that we ought to seriously have this discussion, since we’ve gone to four-year terms for governors, state officials."

Beckham called the explanation a "nice rationalization," but said the end effect would make it harder for challengers to topple incumbents who would have more time to accumulate war chests.

"It doesn’t really make a lot of sense to me to get away from the wisdom of our founding fathers," Beckham said. "The representative should be accountable to his constituents on a regular basis. I’d be reticent to change the system that has worked well for over 200 years. I can’t imagine it passing."

A constitutional amendment would be needed to make the change. Stenholm’s bill would have to be passed by two-thirds of both houses of Congress, then ratified by three-fourths of the states, a process that generally takes years.

Stenholm said he believes other members have filed similar bills in the past, but that they were never seriously considered. The bill is just one of Stenholm’s legislative goals this session.

Before the holiday adjournment, he and Rep. Jim Kolbe, R-Ariz., were working with the White House on Social Security reform legislation they will file.

"My understanding is this will not be a first-hundred-days issue for the president, but if Congress can show support, then the White House will entertain it," Stenholm said. "I am going to do my best to build up congressional support. That will be high on my list of priorities."

Stenholm was re-appointed the ranking Democrat on the House Agriculture Committee. From that vantage point he said he will continue to work on water, conservation and Farm Bill issues.


TOPICS: News/Current Events; Politics/Elections; US: Texas
KEYWORDS: stenholm; terms
Navigation: use the links below to view more comments.
first previous 1-2021-38 last
To: concerned about politics
No, what he really wants is four years to raise money for his next election, not two years. The majority of house members--despite the 90%+ reelection rate--campaign and raise money on a continuous basis.
21 posted on 01/08/2003 9:16:37 AM PST by Catspaw
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 12 | View Replies]

To: rockhead
Rockheaded idiot. He just wants to find a way to keep his job forever.
22 posted on 01/08/2003 9:22:54 AM PST by mhking
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: rockhead
Uh, no offense, rockhead.
23 posted on 01/08/2003 9:23:15 AM PST by mhking
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: rockhead
"I think two-year terms, the costs associated with them — the constant campaigning and the constant need for money-raising

It's just too much work for a social vampire. I mean really.
Active Democrat is an oxymoron.

24 posted on 01/08/2003 9:23:35 AM PST by concerned about politics
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: rockhead
"I’ve had enough constituents in the last two campaigns say, ‘Why don’t you go to four-year terms?’" Stenholm said. "I think two-year terms, the costs associated with them — the constant campaigning and the constant need for money-raising —

Gee, here's an idea: try concentrating on doing your job, rather than trying to keep it.

that we ought to seriously have this discussion, since we’ve gone to four-year terms for governors, state officials."

We know better than those silly Founders. What have they ever thought of, anyway?

25 posted on 01/08/2003 9:25:14 AM PST by Teacher317
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: Centurion2000
Well, now, in fairness, the Congressman has waited 20+ years before proposing a Constitutional Amendment.

...unlike a certain junior Senator from a certain eastern state who proposed her first Constitutional Amendment, abolishing the Electoral College, before her ass had completely whooshed the air out of her seat cushion.

26 posted on 01/08/2003 9:25:41 AM PST by TontoKowalski
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 16 | View Replies]

To: concerned about politics
"I think two-year terms, the costs associated with them — the constant campaigning and the constant need for money-raising

Did somebody hold a gun to his head and make him run? He can quit.

27 posted on 01/08/2003 9:26:48 AM PST by Howlin
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 24 | View Replies]

To: TontoKowalski
LOL.
28 posted on 01/08/2003 9:26:51 AM PST by concerned about politics
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 26 | View Replies]

To: Steve_Seattle
On the other hand, maybe we should just try to figure out a way to shorten the campaign season. However, in this era of "the permanent campaign," I am not sure how that would be done.

Easy... a limit of ONE term. Then NO campaigning will EVER distract a representative from his job for even a single DAY. If America could find sufficient representatives when we had one rep for every 10,000 citizens, I think we can get by now that we have 500,000 to choose from for every post.

That goes for the Senate, as well. The Presidency can still go for two terms, since that is a place for individual leadership, and often it takes more than 4 years to make progress.

29 posted on 01/08/2003 9:30:37 AM PST by Teacher317
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 7 | View Replies]

To: rockhead
What is it with Democrats not letting the american people vote for who they want to represent them .. when are they going to stop trying change the election rules
30 posted on 01/08/2003 9:38:53 AM PST by Mo1 (I Hate DemocRATS !!!)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: rockhead
How about a law forbidding Representatives and Senators from entering the District of Columbia at all during their terms of office except for specifically designated ceremonial occasions? They could conduct all their legislative business via video conferencing from their home states and districts. In fact, let's forbid them from leaving their states for periods of more than three weeks during their terms of office. Make "federal legislator" something like a home-confinement criminal sentence.
31 posted on 01/08/2003 9:42:58 AM PST by Doug Loss
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: rockhead
This is ABSURD. The Constitution of the United States (which Stenholm may not have glanced at in years) specifies two years terms for the U.S. House. This will require a constitutional amendment. LBJ proposed this in 1965 or 1967, and a constitutional amendment went nowhere. Abilene people think they can't exist without Congressman Stenholm!
32 posted on 01/08/2003 9:52:24 AM PST by Theodore R.
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: MSgt Smith
Could it be farm subsidies that keeps Stenholm popular in the little town around Abilene, or is it just incumbency and being recognized?
33 posted on 01/08/2003 9:54:27 AM PST by Theodore R.
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 19 | View Replies]

To: Theodore R.
founders wanted elections every two years to hold these guys' feet to the fire & ensure they were totally responsive to the people. The counter to that was that Senators were NOT supposed to be elected at all. Now we have the senate totally politicized, something the founders didn't want, and now congress-critters want to distance themselves even further from the electorate? ain't gonna happen.
34 posted on 01/08/2003 9:55:16 AM PST by Steven W.
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 32 | View Replies]

To: Ditto
I'd go for it if the amendment also doubled or trippled the size of the House.

The size of the House of Representatives is set by legislation, not by the Constitution. They can double or triple the size without this amendment.

35 posted on 01/08/2003 10:00:03 AM PST by Non-Sequitur
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 14 | View Replies]

To: Non-Sequitur
Good point. You are correct --- as usual.
36 posted on 01/08/2003 10:07:35 AM PST by Ditto
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 35 | View Replies]

To: rockhead
I think two-year terms, the costs associated with them — the constant campaigning and the constant need for money-raising —

He'll do anything for the workers but become one.
He stands for what he thinks people will fall for.
I'm sure he's studied both sides of the issue - so he can go around them!

37 posted on 01/08/2003 10:48:12 AM PST by concerned about politics (Give a democrat something for free, and they'll bitch because it isn't gift wrapped!)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: rockhead
Don't rats suck?
38 posted on 01/08/2003 1:41:35 PM PST by jmaroneps37
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]


Navigation: use the links below to view more comments.
first previous 1-2021-38 last

Disclaimer: Opinions posted on Free Republic are those of the individual posters and do not necessarily represent the opinion of Free Republic or its management. All materials posted herein are protected by copyright law and the exemption for fair use of copyrighted works.

Free Republic
Browse · Search
News/Activism
Topics · Post Article

FreeRepublic, LLC, PO BOX 9771, FRESNO, CA 93794
FreeRepublic.com is powered by software copyright 2000-2008 John Robinson