Free Republic
Browse · Search
News/Activism
Topics · Post Article

Skip to comments.

(PRO-INCOME TAX) group TFT blasts Tennessee for regressive tax structure (sales tax)
The Kingsport Times ^ | 1/7/03 | Hank Hayes

Posted on 01/07/2003 6:29:45 PM PST by GailA

TFT blasts Tennessee for regressive tax structure Wednesday, January 08, 2003

By Hank Hayes Times-News

KINGSPORT - Taxation in Tennessee has gone from bad to worse, according to a statewide group that continues to advocate tax reform.

In a series of news conferences held statewide, Tennesseans for Fair Taxation announced the release of a report concluding that Tennessee has moved from having the sixth to the third most regressive tax structure in the nation.

The report, done by the Washington, D.C.-based Institute on Taxation and Economic Policy, said Tennessee is among 10 states asking their poorest residents - those in the bottom 20 percent of the income scale - to pay up to 5½ times as great a share of their earnings in taxes as those states ask the wealthy to pay.

"By taxing necessities like food and clothing, but not six-figure incomes, Tennessee is forcing low- and middle-income families to carry an unfair share of the state tax burden," said TFT Chair John Stewart in a prepared release.

A state income tax plan failed narrowly in the legislature last year, and Gov.-elect Phil Bredesen said he would not push tax reform when he campaigned for office.

But TFT believes the idea of tax reform is still alive, based on recent court rulings that could cost the state hundreds of millions of dollars.

"It's not going to go away. It's not dead," TFT spokeswoman Lizajean Holt said of tax reform at the group's Kingsport news conference held at the downtown public library. "We're still around. We're not going to go anywhere."

The Institute on Taxation and Economic Policy, which describes itself as a nonprofit, nonpartisan research and education organization that works on government taxation and spending policy issues, said the other nine states with a regressive tax system are Washington, Florida, South Dakota, Texas, Illinois, Michigan, Pennsylvania, Nevada and Alabama.

According to ITEP, the characteristics making the states regressive include the fact that six of the 10 states lack a broad-based personal income tax, and eight of the 10 rely heavily on sales and excise taxes. ITEP based the report on data from the 2000 census and available tax data, according to TFT.

TFT claims to have more than 300 dues-paying members, about 5,600 supporters, and an annual budget of approximately $250,000.

The full ITEP report, including data for all 50 states and the District of Columbia, can be accessed online at www.itepnet.org. TFT can be found at www.yourtax.org.


TOPICS: Constitution/Conservatism; Crime/Corruption; Culture/Society; Extended News; Government; Politics/Elections; US: Tennessee
KEYWORDS: budgetcrisis; incometax; tennessee; weaselphil
FYI
1 posted on 01/07/2003 6:29:46 PM PST by GailA
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | View Replies]

To: GailA
LOL. A report that makes it sound criminal not to have an income tax.
2 posted on 01/07/2003 6:32:09 PM PST by Arkinsaw
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: Arkinsaw
I see that!

Not having a State income tax on top of a sales tax is a crime now?I s there a state that has an income tax, but no slaes tax?

Why cant they just work within estimated state budget? Oh, I forgot, they want to have free health care for all those illigal aliens who come through for the fake IDs and drivers licenses.

3 posted on 01/07/2003 7:14:45 PM PST by sarasmom
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 2 | View Replies]

To: GailA
Talk to California. The giant deficit crater we have is being laid at the feet of the progressive income tax. A comparative handful (@15,000) high-income individuals are responsible for some huge chunk of the state tax revenue. When that group takes a hit like they did after the dot com bust, so does the state. Now California is talking about restructuring its tax system so that it gets more from the sales tax and similar reliable revenue sources, which would avoid the boom and bust cycle. They're talking about applying the sales tax to things like attorney fees, account fees, etc. That's the story at the moment. This being Democrat-dominated California, what I expect to really happen is a bump in the sales tax (which already reaches 8.25% in some areas), application of the sales tax to heretofor-untaxed services, and --oops-- they'll conveniently forget to reduce the income tax. Which means we'll have higher taxes and a continuation of the boom and bust. 'Restructure' to a Democrat only means one thing: more taxes.
4 posted on 01/07/2003 7:21:17 PM PST by John Jorsett
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: GailA
They are playing the same game as the national Rats. They actually believe that the reason the good people of Tennessee rejected the income tax is because the pro-taxers hadn't gotten their message out!
5 posted on 01/07/2003 7:55:56 PM PST by Blood of Tyrants
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

Comment #6 Removed by Moderator

Comment #7 Removed by Moderator

To: GailA
This story hit the Chattanooga Times this morning with a chart that says that the "middle 60%" of taxpayers pay 8.9% of their income on taxes. Well, I'm in the middle 60%, and I pay twice that just on federal income tax, not to mention sales tax, gasoline tax, and all the other hidden taxes we get smacked with.

The "study" is very suspect just on that fact alone. Their numbers are grossly wrong.

I'd like to see a study that shows the absolute amount per capita that the various income groups pay in total taxes. I think we'd come up with a totally different picture of who's carrying the weight.

8 posted on 01/08/2003 7:12:08 AM PST by meyer
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: meyer
There are about 5 taxes on the phone bills alone. Several on your energy bill too. We are taxed to death. What little we realize from W's tax package the State or county will scarf up you can bet on that.
9 posted on 01/08/2003 11:52:41 AM PST by GailA
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 8 | View Replies]

To: GailA
The thing that gets under my skin about groups like TFT is that they send out these press releases with the presupposition that their ideals (i.e. tax progressivity) are unquestionably right and just and that any deviation from that ideal is de facto an injustice.

Tennessee is not a progressive taxation state and there's nothing wrong with that. There are 49 other states to choose from if you don't like that.

10 posted on 01/09/2003 6:42:07 AM PST by tdadams
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

Disclaimer: Opinions posted on Free Republic are those of the individual posters and do not necessarily represent the opinion of Free Republic or its management. All materials posted herein are protected by copyright law and the exemption for fair use of copyrighted works.

Free Republic
Browse · Search
News/Activism
Topics · Post Article

FreeRepublic, LLC, PO BOX 9771, FRESNO, CA 93794
FreeRepublic.com is powered by software copyright 2000-2008 John Robinson