To: sarcasm
What good is NAFTA if it only benefits a few already wealthy people in both countries but harms the majority of people in both?
14 posted on
12/29/2002 3:16:32 PM PST by
FITZ
To: FITZ
I don't know the "real story" of Pancho Villa, having been raised on sanitized textbooks; however it would be interesting to hear what he has to say about Fox's problem solving skills...
To: FITZ
What good is NAFTA if it only benefits a few already wealthy people in both countries but harms the majority of people in both?Because ... what's good for General Bullmoose is good for the U.S.A.
16 posted on
12/29/2002 5:15:28 PM PST by
templar
To: FITZ
What good is NAFTA if it only benefits a few already wealthy people in both countries but harms the majority of people in both?Throughout history the upper classes have had only one interest. The maintenance of their status and guaranteeing that the peasantry never rises to threaten that status or that of their progeny.
The real division in the world always has been class. In the end that matters more than race, religion or nationality.
17 posted on
12/29/2002 7:09:00 PM PST by
Cacique
FreeRepublic.com is powered by software copyright 2000-2008 John Robinson