Posted on 12/26/2002 6:02:33 PM PST by HAL9000
Birth of a small girl obtained by cloning, according to the sect of the raéliens
Friday December 27, 2002 - 1h49 GMT
MIAMI (the United States), 26 déc (AFP) - the scientist Frenchwoman and member of the sect of the raéliens Brigitte Boisselier affirmed Thursday evening with the AFP to have put at the world a baby obtained by the technique of the cloning.
The baby, a small girl, came in the world "today" (Thursday) by Caesarean. "Ca they passed very well", was restricted to affirm Mrs. Boisselier, president of the company of human cloning Clonaid, joined by telephone in Miami (Florida, south-east of the United States).
The effort of the raéliens to put at the world the first cloné baby having been realized in the greatest secrecy, it was not possible, in the absence of a scientific publication in the code of practice, to obtain for the moment an unspecified independent scientific confirmation that the baby was well a clone.
Questioned on the circumstances of this birth, it scientific Frenchwoman refused to give further information immediately more, in particular the birthplace.
"I prefer not in saying more for the moment", has it says, by adding that it would make a public presentation Friday in Florida.
It did not specify either if it would introduce the baby at this occasion.
November 27, Mrs. Boisselier had indicated to the AFP that this birth was awaited by an American couple.
If this birth were confirmed of independent scientific source, it would be about the first baby obtained by the discussed technique of the human cloning and whose birth will have been publicly announced.
If this 'mother' has ANY human emotions, I pity her.....because if this 'child' follows the 'length of life', like the sheep did, this 'mother' will soon be mourning the death of her 'baby'.
I usually avoid these discussions, because they are so often unfruitful, but your questions seems sincere and I will try to provide a short sincere answer.
The following verses are examples of how the word "soul" is generally used in the Bible:
Gen. 46:15 These be the sons of Leah, which she bare unto Jacob in Padanaram, with his daughter Dinah: all the souls of his sons and his daughters were thirty and three.
Exodus 1:5 And all the souls that came out of the loins of Jacob were seventy souls: for Joseph was in Egypt already.
Acts 2:41 Then they that gladly received his word were baptized: and the same day there were added unto them about three thousand souls.
Acts 7:14 Then sent Joseph, and called his father Jacob to him, and all his kindred, threescore and fifteen souls.
Acts 27:37 And we were in all in the ship two hundred threescore and sixteen souls.
In general, the word "soul" means the same as "person" or "one's self" and the world "self" (himself, herself, yourself) and "soul" can often be exchanged, as they are in the following:
If you compare the following passages, you will see that Luke uses the word "himself" to refer to the very same thing Matthew amd Mark use the world "soul" to refer to:
Mat. 16:26 For what is a man profited, if he shall gain the whole world, and lose his own soul? or what shall a man give in exchange for his soul?
Mark 8:36 For what shall it profit a man, if he shall gain the whole world, and lose his own soul?
Luke 9:25 For what is a man advantaged, if he gain the whole world, and lose himself, or be cast away?
Now, in the passage you referred to:
Heb. 4:12 For the word of God is quick, and powerful, and sharper than any twoedged sword, piercing even to the dividing asunder of soul and spirit, and of the joints and marrow, and is a discerner of the thoughts and intents of the heart.
If we understand the "soul" to be a living person, and the spirit is what gives the flesh life, dividing soul and spirit would mean separating life from the flesh, which would mean the person would die, or cease to be a soul. The soul cannot be separated from a person because it is the person.
This may be too long, and you need not agree with it, but it is clear to me that is what the Bible teaches, although most theologians seem very confused on this (and most other) issues.
Hank
The baby was born Dec. 26th by choice. If it had been born Dec. 25th, the Doctor would have never been able to stand up to Christian outrage, which should be forthcoming anyway.
sw
So what happens if this 31 year old Mother gets Breast Cancer or MS or some other disease, say in about 10 years?
If the child survives this long, then how does the Mother explain to the little girl, dubbed "Eve" that her fate is the same?
It's wrong.
sw
I like my scientists a little on the trashy side. : )
You have? Can I get a copy, please?
I guess I'm too dense headed to believe this story. I STILL hold to the idea that God would never allow success in 'cloning'. 'Cuz then the idea of being 'fearfully and wonderfully made', the knitting together, the Him knowing us before we were formed, all would 'point' to Him allowing His glory to be given to another.
How's THAT for being naieve? (bad spelling to boot!)
If not then does it become a body available to unbodied spirits? I am no theologian but I think God would not deny a soul to a human being based on man's folly. I always hope for the divine comedy to turn the product of science against the scientists. I think the soul will be dead when language and free will are bred out of us/them. When you raise human cattle for organs/slavery, however, I fear that milestone is not far beyond the horizon.
Of course, car insurance rates fall abruptly when the driver gets married. If she were twenty two and, say, five-foot-eight and brunette...aw, nevermind.
DUH! This is done for many, many medical conditions (parent - child) today. This is trying to contrive an issue to feign horror about. The birth of a "clone" is just slightly more astounding than the birth of identical twins. It's identical twins 20-30 years apart.
All of the talk about souls, living one's life again, etc is crap. It's like saying twins are one person living in two bodies. BS. Twins are two people (two souls) with thew same genetic code. So are clones.
What would be really amazing would be taking the genetic codes from two people and combining them to make a new person. Come to think of it, that's what my wife and I did this morning.
Genesis 6:9 --
This is the genealogy of Noah. Noah was a just man, perfect in his generations. Noah walked with God.
Luke 17:26 --
And as it was in the days of Noah, so it will be also in the days of the Son of Man...
Scripture directly
tells us that in Noah's time
his "generations"
differed somehow from
everyone else. Now we have
for the very first
time in history
human beings on the planet
whose "generations"
will be "different"
from "normal" human beings.
Are these the End Times?
No one really knows
what the phrase "perfect in his
generations" means.
But clearly God "let"
something happen way back then
which separated
the mass of humans
from Noah. Something about
"generations" and
it wasn't something
good. If God let that occur,
God will allow clones.
God is desperate
to get us to recognize
how much we need Him.
Disclaimer: Opinions posted on Free Republic are those of the individual posters and do not necessarily represent the opinion of Free Republic or its management. All materials posted herein are protected by copyright law and the exemption for fair use of copyrighted works.