Free Republic
Browse · Search
News/Activism
Topics · Post Article

Skip to comments.

ANTHONY BROWNE: Waste your life, learn to speak a foreign language
The Times ^ | December 23, 2002 | Anthony Browne

Posted on 12/23/2002 6:41:07 AM PST by MadIvan

We all know le problème: we are a nation of monoglots, linguistically challenged and so culturally inferior and economically constrained. Only one in four of us can claim to speak in foreign tongues, whereas our chic European chums babble away in a veritable Babel. European governments have lobbied, and the British Government has responded: from 2010 every primary school shall teach foreign. It’s a further good intention paving the road to ruin of our education system. We should shrug off our linguistic hang-ups, and instead of reinforcing language teaching, abolish it tout de suite.

Ordering everyone to learn another language is as pointless as ordering everyone to dig holes and fill them up. The reward for our ancestors persuading the rest of the world to speak English is that there is no need for us to learn what the rest of the world speaks.

All the time we spend learning another language, we should spend instead learning something useful — like economics, business studies, politics, law or computer science. If everyone in the country were forced to study economics as remorselessly as they are forced to learn French, then Britain would be in a far better state (true reform of the NHS would have happened decades ago).

Learning another language may make you feel clever, but it is no longer necessary for speaking with the foreigners you’re most likely to want to speak to: the educated and those working in tourism. Ever regretted you didn’t spend years learning German because of problems communicating with German labourers? I thought not.

I spent three hours a week for six years learning French, but it has proved a total waste of time. I have only needed it on a handful of occasions, and even then it was tourist French learnable in a couple of weeks. I have family friends in France, and have had many enjoyable conversations with our Gallic neighbours, but always in English. I have extended family in Norway and Denmark, but hardly speak either language because I never get the chance: all my Scandinavian relatives speak perfect English.

In contrast to all our continental cousins, Britain is part of the Anglosphere, by far the most powerful linguistic bloc in the world: the US, the UK, Canada, Australia, Ireland and New Zealand — as well as countries such as South Africa and India where English is the language of business and politics. Three of the G7 countries are anglophone.

Even outside the Anglosphere you can thrive with impunity as an English monoglot: you can work with no problems in the European Commission, the European Central Bank and countless multinational companies around the world. There is no obvious alternative language — French is only useful in a couple of developed countries and North Africa, and Spanish helps you on holiday in Cuba.

Don’t get me wrong: I understand the smug satisfaction of mastering another tongue, but it is damaging to force it on the entire population. European children spend 15 per cent of their time learning foreign languages by the age of ten — imagine the advantages we would have if our kids did something more interesting in that time than learning how to ask for un café.

The Government is swimming against the tide of history: as more people learn English, the more pointless it is for Britons to learn another language. There are fewer and fewer people in the world worth speaking to who don’t speak English. Already the number of people studying languages at A level in Britain is plummeting.

The Government’s recent announcement that it is no longer compulsory to learn a foreign language up to GCSE is a welcome dose of reality. But it should go the whole hog, and stop forcing everyone to learn useless knowledge that they will never need, and hardly ever use.


TOPICS: Culture/Society; Editorial; Foreign Affairs; News/Current Events; US: District of Columbia; United Kingdom
KEYWORDS: english; foreigners; language; unnecessary
Navigation: use the links below to view more comments.
first previous 1-2021-4041-6061-66 last
To: All
Was forced to learn Latin for four years in high school...Did very well in it too...The major advantage was that I found myself having a better grasp of English vocabulary..
61 posted on 12/23/2002 12:06:23 PM PST by Wombat101
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 60 | View Replies]

To: MadIvan
No, Mr Browne is wrong. If Americans spent the same time learning economics as they do learning French, they would merely fail to understand economics as they currently fail to under stand French.
62 posted on 12/23/2002 12:09:31 PM PST by Doctor Stochastic
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: MadIvan
I'm not sure about Canada. Quebeckers don't speak it and when they do they sneer.

As for the marvelous English itself: I have a hard enough time keeping up with all the Englishes I hear. The language seems to be evolving quite rapidly with thousands of new words entering the lexicon yearly. Way cool! And we don't convene national language police ministries to decide whether a word belongs to the vast panoply of words or not like the French do. Vive la Anglais!

63 posted on 12/23/2002 12:17:28 PM PST by eleni121
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: MadIvan
As several posters mentioned, the study of a foreign language is necessary to learn English grammar because to my knowledge English grammar is no longer taught in US public schools (UK?). For example, most students have no knowledge of objective case and nominative case pronouns and say things such as "Bobby and me went to the movies. Jennie met he and I there."

Students get to college without a clue how to write correct English. When learning Spanish, for example, they have to study the structure of grammar (unless it is taught in an audio/oral fashion only). Lights go on in their dimly lit brains when they actually realize English has an ordered structure and that Spanish is more complicated. Leaning the structure of language actually helps them to organize thoughts better and think more clearly. Not to mention the fact that they will be able to write correct English and be perceived as educated people. Can we have a cheer for Henry Higgins?

What happened to teaching English? Evidently, it went down the lou with other standards.

Another reason to study language? How about literature? Did you know that Thomas Jefferson learned Spanish specifically to read Cervantes' Don Quixote? Translations of literature never quite achieve the artistic level of the original language.

Some people may never have a "practical" use for another language, but the side effects can be enlightening.





64 posted on 12/23/2002 12:55:38 PM PST by DeFault User
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: MadIvan
I just LOVE how Limeys and my fellow Americans b-tch and moan about how "everyone should speak English" when they come to Anglophone countries, yet then travel/work abroad and expect everyone to speak ENGLISH. I must say that is quite an obnoxious attitude.

Besides, speaking as someone who has done business in Latin America: if you don't know the native tongue, you will be thought a moron and will be taken advantage of. Additionally, being that Old Blighty is economically smaller than Body Odor land and Deutschland, they're pretty much screwed when it comes to linguistic dominance.

I LOVE my English language, but this guy is an obnoxious Pommy a--hole.

65 posted on 12/23/2002 2:42:24 PM PST by Clemenza
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: Tony in Hawaii
Compare that to the actual footage of Japanese sailors cheering as the Pearl
Harbor attackers take off.


Maybe a month or so, I made an impulse purchase of a Time-Life heavy-stock
magazine format "Pearl Harbor" rememberance off the newstand (cost about $10).

It's a good coverage of the events before, during and after...with the great old Life
magazine photo-journalism.

What struck me after 9-11 was to thumb through it and notice a photo of a couple
(man and woman) on the streets of Tokyo reading a newspaper about the
success of their attack at Pearl Harbor.
While I was repulsed over this hearty grins, what got me was how it much they looked as
though they were imitating the society they were attacking...
they were "dressed to the nines" in Western/American late 30'-early 40's clothing.

This really struck me as I saw documentaries about Al-Quida and the Taliban...
for all their religional "purit" and ascetism (sp?)...they all want to be
using the best laptops, using our cell-phones and driving BMWs (OK, Toyota pickups as well).

The only way I can see it...they just want to subdue us...so we can make cool
new cars, guns and electronic gadgets...so they can be more "like us"...
66 posted on 12/23/2002 4:22:52 PM PST by VOA
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 57 | View Replies]


Navigation: use the links below to view more comments.
first previous 1-2021-4041-6061-66 last

Disclaimer: Opinions posted on Free Republic are those of the individual posters and do not necessarily represent the opinion of Free Republic or its management. All materials posted herein are protected by copyright law and the exemption for fair use of copyrighted works.

Free Republic
Browse · Search
News/Activism
Topics · Post Article

FreeRepublic, LLC, PO BOX 9771, FRESNO, CA 93794
FreeRepublic.com is powered by software copyright 2000-2008 John Robinson