Free Republic
Browse · Search
News/Activism
Topics · Post Article

To: ClearCase_guy
Solution is a flat tax IMO. It's fair in that everyone pays the same percentage. If you think your taxes are too high at that point, you have an incentive to vote against goodies for people.
7 posted on 12/22/2002 12:36:24 PM PST by ClearCase_guy
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 6 | View Replies ]


To: ClearCase_guy
Do you know what a nanosecond is? It's about how much time would pass before the malefactors of greed and wealth started trying to pay less than whatever the "flat tax" rate was. NB Not all the rich are malefactors of greed and wealth.
24 posted on 12/22/2002 1:10:41 PM PST by 185JHP
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 7 | View Replies ]

To: ClearCase_guy
Solution is a flat tax IMO. It's fair in that everyone pays the same percentage.

A real flat tax would mean everybody pays the same amount!

It is interesting to think about, or to hear, arguments as to why a tax should be anything other than a fixed quantity per person. It exposes a lot of assumptions, some of them questionable.

For instance, one might argue, "The rich should pay more because they get more in services." But if you look at "services" supported by tax dollars, don't the poor make much more use of police and welfare than the rich? So should not the poor pay more?

I seem to recall Dr. Walter Williams making an argument along this line.

33 posted on 12/22/2002 1:23:22 PM PST by Erasmus
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 7 | View Replies ]

Free Republic
Browse · Search
News/Activism
Topics · Post Article


FreeRepublic, LLC, PO BOX 9771, FRESNO, CA 93794
FreeRepublic.com is powered by software copyright 2000-2008 John Robinson