Free Republic
Browse · Search
News/Activism
Topics · Post Article

Skip to comments.

Lott's feeding frenzy
TownHall.com ^ | 12/16/02 | Robert Novak

Posted on 12/15/2002 10:33:55 PM PST by kattracks

WASHINGTON -- Sen. Trent Lott, reeling from poor strategic handling of an unanticipated crisis, on Thursday afternoon sustained a potentially mortal cut from George W. Bush. Lott's inner circle was stunned, not by the president's harsh criticism, but by what was not said. He did not "put a cap" on the feeding frenzy, failing to commend Lott for service to country and party.

That failure constituted a conscious decision by President Bush. He was determined to avoid a debate over whether Lott should resign as Senate leader. By saying nothing good about Lott, Bush was feeding the furor. The president's aides are well aware of this, but contend they can do nothing about it. Consequently, Lott's leadership remains in jeopardy.

This is a classic case of Republicans eating their own. Democrats gather around disgraced colleagues, most famously Bill Clinton, but also Sen. Robert Byrd, the Senate's senior Democrat. Unlike Lott, Byrd used overtly racist language, but got away with it. It was typically Republican that the president did not telephone his Senate leader until he had spoken to a predominantly black audience in Philadelphia one week after Lott's infamous remarks. Jack Kemp, Lott's longtime political ally, assailed him without warning. These attacks seemed prompted by criticism of Lott rather than what Lott said.

After Bush's speech, a national GOP political operative said Lott had one week to stop the bleeding. "Less than that," one of the senator's aides told me. Once the president spoke, Lott decided to hold his Pascagoula, Miss., press conference Friday night, in which he pleaded for "forbearance and forgiveness." Although stunned by Kemp's comments, Lott took his old friend's advice to meet soon with blacks.

At first, prominent Republicans did not see Lott in serious trouble with his declaration at Thurmond's 100th birthday celebration that the country would have been better off had he been elected president on the 1948 segregationist ticket. When Democratic attacks began, Lott was advised by Republican counselors the storm would soon blow over.

Lott did not see the peril because of what he really meant. While Thurmond is a geriatric miracle, it has been a long time since anybody engaged him in serious political discussion. Typically, Thurmond would rave about the beauty of Lott's wife, Tricia, and Lott would caution him not to "steal her."

Another set piece dialogue had Lott -- tongue-in-cheek -- wishing that Thurmond had been elected in 1948. The birthday party comments were previewed dozens of times by Lott in private encounters with Thurmond. The birthday audience's applause suggests it saw Lott was just kidding the centenarian. Turning a private joke into a public joke, however, produced a train wreck.

The Congressional Black Caucus and the Rev. Jesse Jackson instantly seized on Lott's remarks to play the race card. Prominent Democrats were slow on the pickup. Senate Democratic Leader Thomas Daschle talked to Lott Monday morning, Dec. 9, and said "I accept" Lott's explanation, adding: "There are a lot of times when he and I go to the microphone and would like to say things we meant to say differently." That afternoon, a Black Caucus member who had worked with Lott -- Eleanor Holmes Norton, the District of Columbia delegate -- said on MSNBC: "I've never seen any scintilla of racism in him."

That night on CNN, Jackson called Daschle "weak," and Daschle two days later demanded "a fuller explanation and apology" from Lott. Further scrutiny of Lott yielded the unsurprising revelation that he opposed racial integration as an Ole Miss fraternity boy in 1962. That overlooks the Deep South's remarkable transformation. While nearly all white politicians were segregationists then, none is today -- including Trent Lott.

Lott was late in recognizing the feeding frenzy. His incremental responses were insufficient, aggravated by phoning radio and television programs instead of appearing on camera.

Conservative activists and publications have joined the demand that Lott resign. Democrats played the race card, and conservatives responded on cue. It is now up to the Senate Republican Conference whether the Black Caucus and the news media shall pick the Senate Republican leader. George W. Bush is saying he has no dog in this fight.

©2002 Creators Syndicate, Inc.

Contact Robert Novak | Read his biography



TOPICS: Editorial; News/Current Events; Politics/Elections
KEYWORDS:
Navigation: use the links below to view more comments.
first previous 1-2021-4041-6061-80 ... 161-176 next last
To: ApesForEvolution
Yes, because you are allowing them to decide who can be ML for the party that they despise. Who will be next and when and where does it stop? If not now, when? They keep using and it and we keep falling for it.
41 posted on 12/16/2002 12:02:11 AM PST by kcvl
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 38 | View Replies]

To: Jorge
Wrong. They have been saying plenty to the "news" stations and print media. Lloyd Groves of The Washington Post told Tony Snow James Carville has been calling all the media trying to keep it alive. Who do you think he speaks for if not Hillary Clinton? He has been her mouthpiece since Bill Clinton started running for President and to this day.
42 posted on 12/16/2002 12:04:43 AM PST by kcvl
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 40 | View Replies]

To: Maynerd
Trent Lott has offended not only minorities but likely alienated the squishy moderate swing voters that are critical to electoral success. Furthermore, he has offended many conservatives, myself included. His repeated comments nodding and winking at dixiecrat racism are not only incredibly stupid but disgusting.

Well said. Lott has to go.

43 posted on 12/16/2002 12:06:30 AM PST by Jorge
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 39 | View Replies]

To: wirestripper
"You sure put a bunch of words in Lott's mouth that he did not ever say or even insinuate."

Post Lott's comments, word for word and in their totality, and please tell me in your words what he was trying to insinuate. Add to that any whiffs of segregationist-leaning or outright segregationist/racist relationships and tell me what you see. Because perception is reality for the GOP and conservatives in America today and it shapes the way we must navigate in the legislative arena and the electoral process.

Lott has more character in his behavior and his work in the Senate than any ten of them combined.

And I know a man that is a prolific psychologist and yet is a chronic drug addict. I know of priests that do God's work and lust for little boys. And on and on.

Apparently you have none or you would recognize it immediately.

I don't claim perfect character, do my best, constantly improve...and I'm also not the Leader of the GOP in the Senate.
44 posted on 12/16/2002 12:06:48 AM PST by ApesForEvolution
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 37 | View Replies]

To: Maynerd
Most conservatives long for a colorblind society. I hope you two do as well.

So throwing the race card every time a conservative opens his/her mouth and then conservatives meekly accepting it will lead to a "color-blind society"? You make no logical sense. How can we ever address the failures of the democrats approach to race when we dare not ask the questions that need answering? Blacks do not fear republicans because republicans are in a box with nowhere to go but go along or be driven from public life.

45 posted on 12/16/2002 12:07:14 AM PST by Texasforever
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 39 | View Replies]

To: Maynerd; Jorge
No, It is you who do not "get it".

Lott said nothing offending, nor meant no offense.

This crap was started by the Congressional Black Marxist's and grew legs when some conservative talking heads went off on him because they still hold a grudge since impeachment.

The end result has been a political disaster for Lott, but he did not make it.

It is weak kneed conservatives like yourselves who view your righteous indignation as some sort of frigging religion and refuse to see the consequences of your actions in the long term.

With supporters like you, the republican party needs no other enemy.

46 posted on 12/16/2002 12:07:55 AM PST by Cold Heat
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 39 | View Replies]

To: wirestripper
You sure put a bunch of words in Lott's mouth that he did not ever say or even insinuate.

It is called character assassination by ventriloquism.

47 posted on 12/16/2002 12:09:43 AM PST by Texasforever
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 37 | View Replies]

To: kcvl
The Washington Post told Tony Snow James Carville has been calling all the media trying to keep it alive.

So what. Carville isn't holding a gun to their head making them focus on Trent Lott. The media's been willingly involved in this.

48 posted on 12/16/2002 12:10:55 AM PST by Jorge
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 42 | View Replies]

To: wirestripper
Wow. Quite a rant. The excerpt "Lott said nothing offending," is the crux of the issue. You and obviously Trent Lott aren't offended.

Well you are in the minority on this issue and you don't seem to be taking it very well. How does feel being a minority?
49 posted on 12/16/2002 12:12:17 AM PST by Maynerd
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 46 | View Replies]

To: kcvl
"because you are allowing them to decide who can be ML for the party that they despise"

In this case, their view matters not to me. In this case, I view for myself and while I don't have the power to decide, if I did, he would have fixed this by now. And you know how I would fix it.
50 posted on 12/16/2002 12:13:49 AM PST by ApesForEvolution
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 41 | View Replies]

To: Jorge
My point, Jorge. You don't think James Carville has any influence on the "news" media? Think...Paul Begala, George Stephanopoleous, JAMES CARVILLE all of the Clinton years of corruption.
51 posted on 12/16/2002 12:14:30 AM PST by kcvl
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 48 | View Replies]

To: Texasforever
This debacle can be laid at the hands of eastern views that they still hold from the civil war.

They view all southerners as racist, regardless of anything to the contrary. All southerners know this and none of us like it. In fact, I resent the hell out of it!

This is what this is all about! And I want to stick it right where it came from. The place where the sun never shines!

52 posted on 12/16/2002 12:15:11 AM PST by Cold Heat
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 47 | View Replies]

To: ApesForEvolution
By throwing out a man because the other side labeled him as a racist. They can't win the election so they play another hand of race baiting.
53 posted on 12/16/2002 12:16:26 AM PST by kcvl
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 50 | View Replies]

To: kattracks
Is this what is known as a Feed Lott?
54 posted on 12/16/2002 12:16:44 AM PST by woofie
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: wirestripper
They view all southerners as racist, regardless of anything to the contrary. All southerners know this and none of us like it. In fact, I resent the hell out of it! !

I said the same thing last night.

55 posted on 12/16/2002 12:16:46 AM PST by Texasforever
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 52 | View Replies]

To: wirestripper
No, It is you who do not "get it".

Lott said nothing offending, nor meant no offense.

Oh..ok..all of this has been about nothing. Lott has made at least FIVE public apologies for what he said...but he said "nothing offending".
Right.

56 posted on 12/16/2002 12:17:12 AM PST by Jorge
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 46 | View Replies]

To: Maynerd
How does feel being a minority?

The day I find myself changing my views of right and wrong based on whether it is a minority view, will be the day I cap myself for being a kowtowing idiot and worth less than a turd.

57 posted on 12/16/2002 12:19:04 AM PST by Cold Heat
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 49 | View Replies]

To: wirestripper
They view all southerners as racist, regardless of anything to the contrary. All southerners know this and none of us like it. In fact, I resent the hell out of it!

It is going to stop now because I am sick and tired of this crap. This is one too many times they have tried this and it's going to bite them in the *ss this time. They either stand up to the elites and tell them to shove it or pay the price.

58 posted on 12/16/2002 12:19:30 AM PST by kcvl
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 52 | View Replies]

To: kcvl
"By throwing out a man because the other side labeled him as a racist"

Please read what I'm typing. The opposition's opinion today is not motivating me. I was motivated the day Lott made it an issue by his own stupidity and the fact that he does not have the ability to make it go away. And the deeper one looks, the more I wonder if it will. In fact, not only do I not see it going away, I see it as a tool in the hands of the enemy, created by a fool that I don't trust to begin with. Double whammy.
59 posted on 12/16/2002 12:20:05 AM PST by ApesForEvolution
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 53 | View Replies]

To: kcvl
By throwing out a man because the other side labeled him as a racist. They can't win the election so they play another hand of race baiting.

And Lott isn't responsible for anything he's said. It's all a left wing conspiracy.

60 posted on 12/16/2002 12:20:40 AM PST by Jorge
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 53 | View Replies]


Navigation: use the links below to view more comments.
first previous 1-2021-4041-6061-80 ... 161-176 next last

Disclaimer: Opinions posted on Free Republic are those of the individual posters and do not necessarily represent the opinion of Free Republic or its management. All materials posted herein are protected by copyright law and the exemption for fair use of copyrighted works.

Free Republic
Browse · Search
News/Activism
Topics · Post Article

FreeRepublic, LLC, PO BOX 9771, FRESNO, CA 93794
FreeRepublic.com is powered by software copyright 2000-2008 John Robinson