Skip to comments.
CARDINAL LAW’S RESIGNATION [Rabid Bigots Falsely Accuse Pope]
CatholicLeague ^
| 12-13-2002
| Bill Donohue
Posted on 12/15/2002 8:34:40 PM PST by Notwithstanding
click here to read article
Navigation: use the links below to view more comments.
first previous 1-20 ... 181-200, 201-220, 221-240 ... 301 next last
To: saradippity
I am keeping it as one of only a few bookmarks on myprofile page.
To: BlackElk
This post suggests that the Roman Catholic Church is not your Church. If so, it is also none of your business.
Did two more "unannointed ones" just go down in flames?
202
posted on
12/18/2002 9:27:20 AM PST
by
VOYAGER
To: Admin Moderator; saradippity; AKA Elena; american colleen; Antoninus; Aquinasfan; Aristophanes; ...
Here is post #12 - why on earth was this removed? I really want to know so as to avoid the problem.
CARDINAL LAWS RESIGNATION [Rabid Bigots Falsely Accuse Pope]
Posted by Notwithstanding to Galahad2
On News/Activism 12/15/2002 11:56 PM EST #12 of 161
The pope's role is to defrock a priest when asked to do so if the circumstances call for it.
Apparently you think the religious leader of 1 billion people also should have the role of local cop and prosecutor of every town in the world.
It is a fact that victims did not press charges and therefore prosecutors did not bring indictments. The acts may otherwise be considered criminal, but the pope does not proecute people - even in Vatican City (his own country) he transfers criminal cases within the walls to the civilian authorities of Rome - by choice.
Pope-haters & catholic-haters - please continue to show your true colors. We are taking this all down.
Comment #204 Removed by Moderator
To: Polycarp
Again?
Merry Christmas. God Bless You.
This is so iritating.
To: Desdemona
Again? This is so iritating.
LOL! Which, my third opus, or the censorship ;-)
No hard feelings, I gotta do it for my sanity...this place drives me nutz...
To: Jim Robinson
Please see 203. I do so very much want to know why the post is being pulled.
To: Notwithstanding
We are taking this all down. Whether we take it all down, in the end, matters little compared to the fact He is taking it all down.
To: drstevej
see post # 204...just in case
To: Polycarp
Please take this in the spirit intended:
Your repeated retreats and resignations are tiresome and, well, beneath you. You are needed here, and you do very good and important work. Why surrender when you can fight?
To: Polycarp
LOL! Which, my third opus, or the censorship
Well, drama king, all of it. ALthough as much as the really great stuff keeps getting pulled, that's higher on the list right now. Daily laughs are great things.
BTW, without you and a select few others, the rest of us feel like we've been thrown to the lions.
Comment #212 Removed by Moderator
To: Notwithstanding
Thanks. I'll have to look at it tonight. They have such things blocked where I am now.
Comment #214 Removed by Moderator
To: B-Chan
Still cracks me up. Thanks.
Comment #216 Removed by Moderator
To: sandyeggo
moderator = censor
To: sandyeggo
I think he's really gone this time. I was going to start a pool to see how long it lasted this time around.
What a rotten day.
Comment #219 Removed by Moderator
Comment #220 Removed by Moderator
Navigation: use the links below to view more comments.
first previous 1-20 ... 181-200, 201-220, 221-240 ... 301 next last
Disclaimer:
Opinions posted on Free Republic are those of the individual
posters and do not necessarily represent the opinion of Free Republic or its
management. All materials posted herein are protected by copyright law and the
exemption for fair use of copyrighted works.
FreeRepublic.com is powered by software copyright 2000-2008 John Robinson