Free Republic
Browse · Search
News/Activism
Topics · Post Article

Skip to comments.

A Very Sorry Majority Leader
The Weekly Standard ^ | 12/14/2002 | Stephen F. Hayes

Posted on 12/14/2002 7:18:57 AM PST by NYS_Eric

click here to read article


Navigation: use the links below to view more comments.
first previous 1-20 ... 41-6061-8081-100101-120 last
To: Kay Soze
Why don't you join the reparations party.
101 posted on 12/15/2002 5:54:01 AM PST by John Lenin
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 96 | View Replies]

To: sinkspur
Label him a racist by forcing him out of the Leadership at this time, and watch him leave.

He labelled himself a racist.

Your continued defense of the indefensible is not very edifying.

102 posted on 12/15/2002 5:55:40 AM PST by The Iguana
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 58 | View Replies]

To: thoughtomator
Oustanding post. Well said.
103 posted on 12/15/2002 5:57:19 AM PST by The Iguana
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 97 | View Replies]

To: kcvl
***
How many times do they have to play the race card before all of you wake-up? It's NOT about Lott it's about STEALING what they couldn't win in an election! ***

Let us hope that the people who make the decision in DC understand this! I just remember how many Freepers wanted anybody but Bush during the election. They say they are conservative, but they seem to have a hidden desire for minority status not majority.

Thune SHOULD be in the Senate from South Dakota.
Widow Carnahan should never have been in the Senate two years ago. We cannot cave to the Dem destruction machine!
104 posted on 12/15/2002 6:02:34 AM PST by maica
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 99 | View Replies]

To: Kay Soze
What's worse is that there is a struggle between Blacks and Hispanics within the Dim-o-cratic party and PRIOR to supporting Lotts racist past and curent positions we had real oppurtunity to gain more black votes.

Are you out of your mind, the only way to get blacks to vote GOP is shame them out of their hypocrisy and this issue can do it unless conservatives like you hand the race card back to the RATS on a silver platter like you are trying to do.
105 posted on 12/15/2002 6:03:11 AM PST by John Lenin
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 92 | View Replies]

To: maica
If we saw these pictures on the "news" every night it might change some minds.

Every time a RAT opens their mouth about Lott flash them with these...


106 posted on 12/15/2002 6:09:24 AM PST by kcvl
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 104 | View Replies]

To: A.J.Armitage
"What lie would that be? That Lott said the segregationist candidate should've won? He said it live on C-Span."

Earth calling A.J. Armitage -- the "lie" is the slander that you and Democratic race-baiters Lott are trying to make stick -- that Trent Lott is in fact a "racist," as well as your goofy predictions and assertion:

""Go ahead. Kill the American Republic and all the hope and freedom for a thousand years just to keep your man Lott happy."

Buy yourself a bomb shelter. And wear a crash helmet in your house. Quick -- pre-emptively call 911 -- I'm sure an asteroid is about to hit...

"You have no counter-assessment."

I could humor you, but your existance in another universe prevents such undertanding on your part.

" I'm not sure what you think it means, but a venue is the location where something is carried out, like a trial or a concert.

Thanks Webster -- a 'Venue' may very well be a "location where something is carried out" or perhaps the 'scene of an event'. Surprise, surprise -- not much registers with you, does it?

107 posted on 12/15/2002 3:17:44 PM PST by F16Fighter
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 93 | View Replies]

To: F16Fighter
Earth calling A.J. Armitage -- the "lie" is the slander that you and Democratic race-baiters Lott are trying to make stick -- that Trent Lott is in fact a "racist,"

Lott is a racist. There's no way around it. He has a long pattern of this stuff.

I could humor you, but your existance in another universe prevents such undertanding on your part.

In other words, you have no answer. Keeping Lott will prevent any increase in the minority vote for the GOP. That means the GOP will die. You can't argue with demographics. The death of the GOP means the United States will become a one-party system. Especially considering which party that would be, that means the end of the Republic, which means the end of hope for freedom in the world.

You may not want to believe the above, but it really is that serious.

Thanks Webster -- a 'Venue' may very well be a "location where something is carried out" or perhaps the 'scene of an event'. Surprise, surprise -- not much registers with you, does it?

You have to turn your inane malapropism into an insult directed at me. Not man enough to admit you're not ready to use big words yet, are you?

108 posted on 12/15/2002 3:36:41 PM PST by A.J.Armitage
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 107 | View Replies]

To: A.J.Armitage
"Lott is a racist. There's no way around it. He has a long pattern of this stuff."

You have been indoctrinated well. Kudos to your Sensitivity Training instructors.

"You have no answer. Keeping Lott will prevent any increase in the minority vote for the GOP... That means the GOP will die...[as well as] the end of the Republic, which means the end of hope for freedom in the world."

I CAN "argue" however with your entire premise that the vote of minorities (92% blacks voted Gore for Prez in 2000), the death of the GOP as a viable party, AND hence the "end of hope of freedom in the world" actually hinges on one singular historical event -- THE Trent Lott "statement." It's patently absurd. THAT is my "answer."

"You have to turn your inane malapropism into an insult directed at me. Not man enough to admit you're not ready to use big words yet, are you?"

"Inane malapropism"?? LOL -- You're the one playing amateur librarian, assuming to out-define Webster, Webster.

109 posted on 12/15/2002 4:04:24 PM PST by F16Fighter
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 108 | View Replies]

To: F16Fighter
You have been indoctrinated well. Kudos to your Sensitivity Training instructors.

You just said the common sense understanding of what he said is "indoctrination". But then, who knows what you think "indoctrinated" means?

I CAN "argue" however with your entire premise that the vote of minorities (92% blacks voted Gore for Prez in 2000), the death of the GOP as a viable party, AND hence the "end of hope of freedom in the world" actually hinges on one singular historical event -- THE Trent Lott "statement." It's patently absurd. THAT is my "answer."

You sad little naif.

Play the clip of Lott. Show pictures of lynchings. Show Lott shaking hands with the Republican candidate in the race. Repeat.

That WILL kill any hope of winning even a small gain the black vote. Demographic changes mean that will kill the GOP.

"Inane malapropism"?? LOL -- You're the one playing amateur librarian, assuming to out-define Webster, Webster.

Eh? Knowing what the word means (as would any reasonably educated English-speaker) has nothing to do with Webster's dictionary.

But maybe you've got something else in mind by "define".

110 posted on 12/15/2002 4:30:00 PM PST by A.J.Armitage
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 109 | View Replies]

To: A.J.Armitage
"But then, who knows what you think 'indoctrinated' means?

You're living proof here at FR.

"Play the clip of Lott. Show pictures of lynchings. Show Lott shaking hands with the Republican candidate in the race. Repeat."

Stop wallowing in unfounded fear, will ya?

Do you assume the GOP and Dubya don't have a Robert Byrd or Fritz Hollins OR Algore's daddy to model as their poster-child of racism? Have you noted a relatively tempered Democratic reaction? THEY have far more to lose in the event actual racism is cited and documented and made issue of by the GOP.

"Knowing what the word means (as would any reasonably educated English-speaker) has nothing to do with Webster's dictionary."

Haven't you embarrassed yourself, Shakespeare?

111 posted on 12/15/2002 4:52:35 PM PST by F16Fighter
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 110 | View Replies]

To: aruanan
I agree. With everything you said.
112 posted on 12/15/2002 5:10:18 PM PST by mountainfolk
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 5 | View Replies]

To: F16Fighter
Stop wallowing in unfounded fear, will ya?

Unfounded? Are you an idiot?

Dubya had nothing to do with the murder of James Byrd. They used it anyway. Do you think they won't use it when they've got Lott dead to rights?

Do you assume the GOP and Dubya don't have a Robert Byrd or Fritz Hollins OR Algore's daddy to model as their poster-child of racism?

Did he when they ran the Byrd ad? What makes you think he'll do it now that they've got something?

Haven't you embarrassed yourself, Shakespeare?

I'm supposed to be embarassed for knowing the meaning of a common word?

And I suppose you're proud of the fact that you showed off your ignorance of ordinary English.

This is all making sense now. Say hi to Lurlene in the next double-wide over, will ya?

113 posted on 12/15/2002 7:32:33 PM PST by A.J.Armitage
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 111 | View Replies]

To: A.J.Armitage
"Did he [Dubya use Robert Byrd as a poster-child] when they ran the [James] Byrd ad? What makes you think he'll do it now that they've got something?"

Hey Sherlock -- Dubya wasn't quite President yet, was he? Slightly different power dymanics this time around. Not everyone will be reacting like a frightened beagle at the prospect of Democrats playing dirty --unless you believe a strong standing GOP president will be joining you down in your bunker.

"This is all making sense now. Say hi to Lurlene in the next double-wide over, will ya?"

LOL -- I will. And BTW, A.J. -- Lurlene tells me your favorite hiding place is under her dress.

114 posted on 12/15/2002 8:11:42 PM PST by F16Fighter
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 113 | View Replies]

To: F16Fighter
Hey Sherlock -- Dubya wasn't quite President yet, was he?

And therefore he couldn't run an ad?

You're pathetic.

115 posted on 12/15/2002 9:31:43 PM PST by A.J.Armitage
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 114 | View Replies]

To: DoughtyOne
Here's another example of deliberate spin (or just plain, unthinking idiocy): this morning the ABC news reader on the radio said that Lott will appear on the Black Entertainment Network to "explain his controversial comments on Strom Thurmond and segregation." Amazing, isn't it?
116 posted on 12/16/2002 5:04:24 AM PST by aruanan
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 57 | View Replies]

To: A.J.Armitage
Dear Skippy,

It is clear you are much more suited at constructing and conveying context and debate at late night frat house beer parties. Must be far easier to convince Mummy and Daddy that Junior hasn't actually pissed away their hard earned money.

P.S. -- "Go ahead. Kill the American Republic and all hope of freedom in the world for a thousand years just to keep your man Lott happy." -- A.J. Armitage...

LOL, may be the FR hyperbole of the year -- thanks for the memories...

117 posted on 12/16/2002 7:19:15 AM PST by F16Fighter
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 115 | View Replies]

To: laconic
Exactly, this is only the culmination of sins by Lott. I find it difficult believe that some of the same conservatives who called him "Traitor Lott" during the impeachment kangaroo trial now want him to stay as majority leader, all to "prove a point."
118 posted on 12/16/2002 7:26:29 AM PST by Austin Willard Wright
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 7 | View Replies]

To: Austin Willard Wright
Right; also, I think probably 90 percent of white southerners are glad segregation is gone and the Civil Rights Act was passed (I'm not talking about what "civil rights" has evolved into, which is now too often a racial spoils system). Thirty years ago, a senator from Mississippi could not have been elected majority leader because of the bad publicity surrounding the state; Lott, despite his obvious deficiencies as a leader, served as Rep majority leader for six years and still would, but for the fact of this latest idiotic statement. Why he would bring this topic up (an election with a fringe candidate that took place 54 years ago) at an inconsequential event like a birthday party for a retiring senator is beyond my comprehension. I can only think, without any proof, that alcohol may have been involved.
119 posted on 12/16/2002 8:34:22 AM PST by laconic
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 118 | View Replies]

To: aruanan
Sure is.
120 posted on 12/16/2002 6:20:58 PM PST by DoughtyOne
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 116 | View Replies]


Navigation: use the links below to view more comments.
first previous 1-20 ... 41-6061-8081-100101-120 last

Disclaimer: Opinions posted on Free Republic are those of the individual posters and do not necessarily represent the opinion of Free Republic or its management. All materials posted herein are protected by copyright law and the exemption for fair use of copyrighted works.

Free Republic
Browse · Search
News/Activism
Topics · Post Article

FreeRepublic, LLC, PO BOX 9771, FRESNO, CA 93794
FreeRepublic.com is powered by software copyright 2000-2008 John Robinson