You have been indoctrinated well. Kudos to your Sensitivity Training instructors.
"You have no answer. Keeping Lott will prevent any increase in the minority vote for the GOP... That means the GOP will die...[as well as] the end of the Republic, which means the end of hope for freedom in the world."
I CAN "argue" however with your entire premise that the vote of minorities (92% blacks voted Gore for Prez in 2000), the death of the GOP as a viable party, AND hence the "end of hope of freedom in the world" actually hinges on one singular historical event -- THE Trent Lott "statement." It's patently absurd. THAT is my "answer."
"You have to turn your inane malapropism into an insult directed at me. Not man enough to admit you're not ready to use big words yet, are you?"
"Inane malapropism"?? LOL -- You're the one playing amateur librarian, assuming to out-define Webster, Webster.
You just said the common sense understanding of what he said is "indoctrination". But then, who knows what you think "indoctrinated" means?
I CAN "argue" however with your entire premise that the vote of minorities (92% blacks voted Gore for Prez in 2000), the death of the GOP as a viable party, AND hence the "end of hope of freedom in the world" actually hinges on one singular historical event -- THE Trent Lott "statement." It's patently absurd. THAT is my "answer."
You sad little naif.
Play the clip of Lott. Show pictures of lynchings. Show Lott shaking hands with the Republican candidate in the race. Repeat.
That WILL kill any hope of winning even a small gain the black vote. Demographic changes mean that will kill the GOP.
"Inane malapropism"?? LOL -- You're the one playing amateur librarian, assuming to out-define Webster, Webster.
Eh? Knowing what the word means (as would any reasonably educated English-speaker) has nothing to do with Webster's dictionary.
But maybe you've got something else in mind by "define".