Free Republic
Browse · Search
News/Activism
Topics · Post Article

To: JulieRNR21
Sorry, Julie. Lott did praise Thurmond's segregationist campaign. By saying the country would have been better off electing a segregationist in 1948, he's doing just that. He meant those words in 1980, he meant them last Saturday, and he meant them the times he said it behind closed doors (which in your heart you know he's done). He was pro-segregation as a 22-year-old and then went to work for a white supremacist congressman in MS. Trent Lott is a bigot. You'll feel better once you admit it.
126 posted on 12/13/2002 9:24:10 AM PST by GraniteStateConservative
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 112 | View Replies ]


To: GraniteStateConservative
Why couldn't he have been a loyal Republican and said he supported Dewey in '48?
129 posted on 12/13/2002 9:28:33 AM PST by dfwgator
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 126 | View Replies ]

To: GraniteStateConservative
Sorry, Julie. Lott did praise Thurmond's segregationist campaign. By saying the country would have been better off electing a segregationist in 1948, he's doing just that.

Not really. He could have been praising his ability to fight government spending, or his ability to work with the left, or his vision of better schools. Who said he was praising his segragation? Who says that's what thought was in his head? Who? The left. Can they still read minds like in the 200 election? Unless they're diving thoughts again, maybe Lott ment his love for friggin flowers!
Did Lott say "I praise him for his stand on segragation?" No, he didn't. He may not have even been thinking about that! Prove he was!
This is left wing race bating. Nothing more. More dividing the people for votes, and attemptiong to use their politics of personal destruction and political blackmail.
Lott is innocent until proven guilty. Unless America can read his mind and divine his intent, I say get over it. Rent a good movie or something.

138 posted on 12/13/2002 9:35:17 AM PST by concerned about politics
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 126 | View Replies ]

To: GraniteStateConservative
And your proof that he was referring to the segregationist plank specifically is what exactly?
172 posted on 12/13/2002 10:19:54 AM PST by rwfromkansas
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 126 | View Replies ]

To: GraniteStateConservative
Sorry, Julie. Lott did praise Thurmond's segregationist campaign. By saying the country would have been better off electing a segregationist in 1948, he's doing just that. He meant those words in 1980, he meant them last Saturday, and he meant them the times he said it behind closed doors (which in your heart you know he's done). He was pro-segregation as a 22-year-old and then went to work for a white supremacist congressman in MS. Trent Lott is a bigot. You'll feel better once you admit it.

Please show me the quote where Lott said those words: "electing a segregationist'. I really believe that he mis-spoke & was trying to praise a 100 year old....he goofed...big time....but I don't think he said those words.

BTW was Byrd a bigot when he belonged to the KKK? To me that is far worse than anything Lott has ever said.

The media is working with the DNC to try to destroy the GOP's chances with the Black community.

Lott should resign the leadership only if Byrd is also censored for his membership in the KKK! Clinton did far worse than Lott.....lied under oath & broke his Oath of Office.....he never resigned & neither should Lott!

233 posted on 12/13/2002 12:15:23 PM PST by JulieRNR21
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 126 | View Replies ]

Free Republic
Browse · Search
News/Activism
Topics · Post Article


FreeRepublic, LLC, PO BOX 9771, FRESNO, CA 93794
FreeRepublic.com is powered by software copyright 2000-2008 John Robinson