Free Republic
Browse · Search
News/Activism
Topics · Post Article

Skip to comments.

Oral sex linked to cancer of the mouth
Suday Herald (UK) ^ | unknown | Sarah-Kate Templeton

Posted on 12/12/2002 8:13:17 AM PST by Sangamon Kid

Oral sex linked to cancer of the mouth

By Sarah-Kate Templeton

New research to be published next year will provide powerful evidence that oral sex can cause mouth cancer.

Doctors who first suggested a form of mouth cancer could be linked to the same sexually transmitted virus that causes cervical cancer have found more data to back their controversial theory. Two years ago, the group from Johns Hopkins University in the US published a paper suggesting the human papilloma virus (HPV), the cause of most cervical cancer, can also cause mouth cancer.

A new study, to be published in six months' time, will confirm this research, according to Dr Maura Gillison, an oncologist and member of the Johns Hopkins group. The news comes as Scottish mouth cancer experts are calling for research to be done here into the suspected link with oral sex.

David Soutar, president of the British Association of Head and Neck Oncologists, said: 'We were involved in a pilot study which suggested that this is certainly something that we should look into.

'It should be investigated further, particularly in people who don't have any of the risk factors such as smoking and drinking.

'One of the things that has interested me over the past 15 years is the increase in the number of women with oral cancer. It used to be five men to one woman but it is now about two men to one woman. What we do not know is whether this is all down to smoking.

'When I see the increase in women with oral cancer I think oral sex has to be one of the causes. We also have to find out why the age group suffering from oral cancer is becoming younger. Ideally, we would want to look at the under-45s.'

Mr Soutar, a consultant plastic surgeon at Canniesburn Hospital and the Nuffield Hospital, both in Glasgow, says it is difficult to find people willing to discuss their sexual behaviour, but says we have to consider the possibility sexually transmitted viruses are one of the causes.

Finding out whether HPV is a cause of mouth cancer is all the more pressing now that new treatments are being developed to fight cervical cancer. A vaccine to stop cervical cancer could become available within five years and doctors believe a similar vaccine could protect against some oral cancers.

The vaccine works by boosting the immune system against strains of HPV. The vaccine against cervical cancer will be targeted at girls of about 12 or 13, before they become sexually active and vulnerable to HPV.

But Soutar warns that, unlike cervical cancer where most forms of the disease are caused by HPV, the sexually transmitted virus could only be responsible for less than 20% of mouth cancer cases. He said targeting a vaccine would therefore be more difficult.

'If we could identify the sub-group this would be of benefit. We know smoking and drinking is probably the cause in 80% of cases so we couldn't use it in the same way as the vaccine against cervical cancer. This would only be a small proportion of those who have oral cancer.'

In the past decade in Scotland there has been an almost 50% increase in oral cancer among under-45s, and in the last 40 years a fourfold increase in younger patients suffering from it. Oral cancer affects 3000 people in the UK each year and the problem is worse north of the border.

www.omfsaboutface.co.uk/ aware.htm
www.cancerresearchuk.org


TOPICS: Culture/Society; Front Page News; United Kingdom
KEYWORDS: cancer; catholiclist; fellatio; homosexuality; morals; mouthcancer; multiplesexpartners; oralsex; semen; sex; sodomy; values; wellthissucks
Navigation: use the links below to view more comments.
first previous 1-20 ... 261-280281-300301-320 ... 341-349 next last
To: Bella_Bru
I have a feeling the psycho will show here eventually.

I'm still trying to figure out how calling for the death penalty for gays fits in with the 'new' FR.....

281 posted on 12/12/2002 7:51:13 PM PST by DAnconia55
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 115 | View Replies]

To: Chemist_Geek
We do not have a right to oral sex because that would require someone to provide it, and if no one is willing, then someone must be enslaved to provide it.

Hmmm wonder if the FR Taliban knows it's ok to have sex with your Slave Girls... according to the OT, at least...

282 posted on 12/12/2002 7:53:44 PM PST by DAnconia55
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 142 | View Replies]

To: traditionalist
Fellatio is a corruption of the sex act, and hence it is a sin against nature, as are all acts of sodomy. In fact, it is an even worse sin than pre-marital sexual intercourse, since the latter is merely a sin of passion. That's why Dante places sodomites, which include those who engage in fellatio, in a lower ring in Hell than those guilty of mere lust.

Yeah, but can we use a warm loaf of bread?

283 posted on 12/12/2002 7:56:44 PM PST by DAnconia55
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 155 | View Replies]

To: SandfleaCSC
Yep, as unnatural as a Yankee putting ketchup on eggs or syrup on grits, but not something to be legislated out of exsistence

Ok. Now that's just wrong...

284 posted on 12/12/2002 8:02:44 PM PST by DAnconia55
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 195 | View Replies]

To: u-89
On the flip side most men just out of image projection amongst peers won't admit to not liking to perform for women even if they are sqeamish in practice.

You're kidding. I must be odd then... Giving and receiving are both fun :)

285 posted on 12/12/2002 8:11:07 PM PST by DAnconia55
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 250 | View Replies]

To: DAnconia55
Hey don't get me wrong I didn't say I or most men were squeamish I said guys wouldn't admit it if they were. Not to get personal but after seeing some guy's wives I could see why they were squeamish. Beauty is in the eye of the beholder but we should at least stick with the same species. Yaks and Sasquatch just don't cut it with me. Will quit now before I get into trouble. Back to my beer and friends for the evening. Signing off.
286 posted on 12/12/2002 8:28:47 PM PST by u-89
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 285 | View Replies]

To: DAnconia55
I think this thread has finally petered out.
287 posted on 12/12/2002 8:28:55 PM PST by NYTexan
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 285 | View Replies]

To: Sangamon Kid
Go with the full body condom and you will be safe I guess.
288 posted on 12/12/2002 8:37:24 PM PST by A CA Guy
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: DAnconia55
you are free to use any ego defense you like..Hope your partner stays safe ..you certainly will not worry about her
289 posted on 12/12/2002 8:41:06 PM PST by RnMomof7
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 278 | View Replies]

To: Sangamon Kid
I guess Tony Soprano was right after all.
290 posted on 12/12/2002 8:48:30 PM PST by StockAyatollah
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: general_re
? I'm telling you, expensive jewelry under the Christmas tree goes a long way ;)

A conventioneer's wife sitting at the restaurant bar on Lee Circle a couple months ago ended up (don't ask me how ...) explaining to me and my bartender friend that she'd gotten her new house in San Jose by promising her husband oral sex once a week for three years.

She was a really nice woman ... fulltime mother, great figure, funny and -- best of all -- born in Shreveport, Louisiana and admittedly so glad to be the hell out of California and among real folks in New Orleans who have no problems chit-chatting with strangers that she spilled somewhat after a round or two.

But I have to admit, it was an utterly depressing scenario. I cannot for the life of me imagine bargaining and keeping track thus. (His stomach was upset -- that's why she was at the bar -- and his flu the week before meant she owed him two at the moment.)

"And then that's it!" ... she was counting down the weeks until she was done for good.

No wonder so many men around here think -- and speak -- of their wives as money-grubbing whores who won't put out unless the price is right. War-weary prostitutes, as it were, who'll rally to go the extra mile but only to get a house or some diamonds for the annual Christ's Mass celebration.

291 posted on 12/12/2002 8:55:19 PM PST by Askel5
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 52 | View Replies]

To: RnMomof7
Hope your partner stays safe ..you certainly will not worry about her

She just likes toasted bread too much, what can I say.

292 posted on 12/12/2002 9:00:56 PM PST by DAnconia55
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 289 | View Replies]

To: realpatriot71
Seriously, some folks are out to make any pleasurable act a sin.

I figure if men had warts lasered off their penises as often as women have warts lasered out of their vaginas, off their cervixes and from the backs of their throats ... they might realize that there may be more to this than some "Biblical" interpretations about oral sex.

Contrary to the nature of most posts on the subject (or on this thread) ... what happens between two married people is intensely and properly PRIVATE.

Ideally, neither runs around copulating or having oral intercourse with a dozen or more partners before thinking to switch their physical, mental, emotional and spiritual gears and pledge themselves to the One spouse.

At the heart of the spread of this disease is promiscuity, plain and simple.

"Sexual liberation" is a mirage. (That's why the State's so intent on ensuring this particular freedom ... even ruling that for-profit porn of child sex is "Free Speech" if the images -- if not the ensuing intended ejaculations -- have been properly faked.)

Restraint is the better part of freedom. It's restraint by which we keep open and enjoy the optimum array of Choices.

AIDS, warts, herpes, pregnancy, abortion and the emotional and mental scars (particularly for women who, as young girls, are absolutely encouraged to eschew their natural feminine modesty) limit a person.

293 posted on 12/12/2002 9:05:42 PM PST by Askel5
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 95 | View Replies]

To: RnMomof7
In this thread we can glimpe inklings of the true motivations behind some seemingly positive social movements.

M.A.D.D opposes drunk driving, a laudable goal, but deep inside the 'mothers'organization is the old temperance movment that saw the consumption of alcohol as a blight on society. Many of these prohibitionist were women who believed that if only men could be kept sober they could be made responsible.

The environmentalist oppose logging (among other things) because they want to preserve natural forest ecosystems, a laudable goal, but deep inside the movement is an abiding hatred for free-market capitalism. Many environmentalist would like to see the collapse of western market-driven economies and the imposition of some socialist 'green' ethic.

The Right to life movement opposes abortion, a laudable goal but deep inside the movement is a victorian anti-sexuality crusade. Many RTLers would like nothing more than to see all methods of birth control banned becuase the threat of pregnacy at every turn would put a stop to this rampant sex-is-fun craze that started after the pill was invented. Abstinence--the only solution to teen pregnacy in their minds--is the prefered option for ALL of us dirty folk that enjoy their intimacy too much for the buttoned-down set.
294 posted on 12/12/2002 9:10:51 PM PST by Pitchfork
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 289 | View Replies]

To: Bella_Bru
Because they think the more miserable they are in this life

What makes you think they're miserable, Bella?

("They" being anyone who doesn't partake of our Culture of Death's take on sex ... non-procreative, strictly recreational and increasingly perverse on a playing field of Sadean sado-masochism and rank misogyny.)

To be honest, I'm not big on being "judgmental". Where sex is concerned, however, I find far more of the Judging being done -- and in an absolutely personal fashion -- by those who ridicule and attack anyone who counters the Conventional Wisdom on sex and relationships as espoused and specifically protected by our evil government and their interlock of image-builders, experts and "scientists" like that criminal pedophile and grotesque pervert Kinsey.

295 posted on 12/12/2002 9:11:57 PM PST by Askel5
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 99 | View Replies]

To: Askel5
To be honest, I'm not big on being "judgmental".

Cough. Cough.

296 posted on 12/12/2002 9:26:19 PM PST by DAnconia55
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 295 | View Replies]

To: Askel5
that criminal pedophile and grotesque pervert Kinsey." Absolutely! Bump! His theories, and the use made of them, have been so destructive.
297 posted on 12/12/2002 9:26:35 PM PST by BlackVeil
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 295 | View Replies]

To: Askel5
Riiiiight. What supposed to happen between a married couple is supposed to be private, except when the Church wants their say, right?

Sorry you find oral sex between a couple to be the "culture of death". Now, go out and rub your Mary statue, you'll feel better.

298 posted on 12/12/2002 9:38:45 PM PST by Bella_Bru
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 295 | View Replies]

To: DAnconia55
Pfffft. You'd be surprised. Well, maybe not. I wasn't.
299 posted on 12/12/2002 9:40:38 PM PST by Bella_Bru
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 281 | View Replies]

To: Karsus; longshadow
the Taliban division of FR

LOL, hypocrisy is everywhere...particularly when none one is home, or they're on business trips.

300 posted on 12/12/2002 11:32:09 PM PST by Aracelis
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 11 | View Replies]


Navigation: use the links below to view more comments.
first previous 1-20 ... 261-280281-300301-320 ... 341-349 next last

Disclaimer: Opinions posted on Free Republic are those of the individual posters and do not necessarily represent the opinion of Free Republic or its management. All materials posted herein are protected by copyright law and the exemption for fair use of copyrighted works.

Free Republic
Browse · Search
News/Activism
Topics · Post Article

FreeRepublic, LLC, PO BOX 9771, FRESNO, CA 93794
FreeRepublic.com is powered by software copyright 2000-2008 John Robinson