Free Republic
Browse · Search
News/Activism
Topics · Post Article

Skip to comments.

Oral sex linked to cancer of the mouth
Suday Herald (UK) ^ | unknown | Sarah-Kate Templeton

Posted on 12/12/2002 8:13:17 AM PST by Sangamon Kid

Oral sex linked to cancer of the mouth

By Sarah-Kate Templeton

New research to be published next year will provide powerful evidence that oral sex can cause mouth cancer.

Doctors who first suggested a form of mouth cancer could be linked to the same sexually transmitted virus that causes cervical cancer have found more data to back their controversial theory. Two years ago, the group from Johns Hopkins University in the US published a paper suggesting the human papilloma virus (HPV), the cause of most cervical cancer, can also cause mouth cancer.

A new study, to be published in six months' time, will confirm this research, according to Dr Maura Gillison, an oncologist and member of the Johns Hopkins group. The news comes as Scottish mouth cancer experts are calling for research to be done here into the suspected link with oral sex.

David Soutar, president of the British Association of Head and Neck Oncologists, said: 'We were involved in a pilot study which suggested that this is certainly something that we should look into.

'It should be investigated further, particularly in people who don't have any of the risk factors such as smoking and drinking.

'One of the things that has interested me over the past 15 years is the increase in the number of women with oral cancer. It used to be five men to one woman but it is now about two men to one woman. What we do not know is whether this is all down to smoking.

'When I see the increase in women with oral cancer I think oral sex has to be one of the causes. We also have to find out why the age group suffering from oral cancer is becoming younger. Ideally, we would want to look at the under-45s.'

Mr Soutar, a consultant plastic surgeon at Canniesburn Hospital and the Nuffield Hospital, both in Glasgow, says it is difficult to find people willing to discuss their sexual behaviour, but says we have to consider the possibility sexually transmitted viruses are one of the causes.

Finding out whether HPV is a cause of mouth cancer is all the more pressing now that new treatments are being developed to fight cervical cancer. A vaccine to stop cervical cancer could become available within five years and doctors believe a similar vaccine could protect against some oral cancers.

The vaccine works by boosting the immune system against strains of HPV. The vaccine against cervical cancer will be targeted at girls of about 12 or 13, before they become sexually active and vulnerable to HPV.

But Soutar warns that, unlike cervical cancer where most forms of the disease are caused by HPV, the sexually transmitted virus could only be responsible for less than 20% of mouth cancer cases. He said targeting a vaccine would therefore be more difficult.

'If we could identify the sub-group this would be of benefit. We know smoking and drinking is probably the cause in 80% of cases so we couldn't use it in the same way as the vaccine against cervical cancer. This would only be a small proportion of those who have oral cancer.'

In the past decade in Scotland there has been an almost 50% increase in oral cancer among under-45s, and in the last 40 years a fourfold increase in younger patients suffering from it. Oral cancer affects 3000 people in the UK each year and the problem is worse north of the border.

www.omfsaboutface.co.uk/ aware.htm
www.cancerresearchuk.org


TOPICS: Culture/Society; Front Page News; United Kingdom
KEYWORDS: cancer; catholiclist; fellatio; homosexuality; morals; mouthcancer; multiplesexpartners; oralsex; semen; sex; sodomy; values; wellthissucks
Navigation: use the links below to view more comments.
first previous 1-20 ... 181-200201-220221-240 ... 341-349 next last
To: Dead Corpse
But what could Dr. Ruth really know about sex?

Have you seen her? Yeek! When was the last time she had any action.

201 posted on 12/12/2002 12:50:08 PM PST by CougarGA7
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 200 | View Replies]

To: CougarGA7
Dr Ruth, that thought just ruined by plans for the evening...
Like I keep telling the wifey, Practice makes perfect.
so she says go ahead and practice all you want. the end justifies the means.
nudge nudge wink wink....
202 posted on 12/12/2002 12:53:30 PM PST by vin-one
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 201 | View Replies]

To: vin-one
...say no more...nudge nudge wink wink.
203 posted on 12/12/2002 12:56:57 PM PST by CougarGA7
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 202 | View Replies]

To: hellinahandcart
Actually sex between a husband and wife is a minor issue here..women are more greatly affected by a multitude of sex partners, or a cheating husband brining the virus home (stats show this ) His penis is not affected by the cancer causing virus only his "partner's or "partners" cervix ...

The issue with cervical cancer is one specific virus KNOWN to cause Cervical cancer (easily diagnosed early with regular pap smears)

IF you read the article it speaks to an increase in the FEMALE rate increase ....an indicator that the woman is at risk because she is the recepticle...

This article is a WARNING to women that this practice (often used by singles to prevent pregency )could be deadly .

I simply find the hand wringing by men interesting ..more afraid of losing their favorite sex than the potential risk to a woman . (dare I say a condom would remove the risk? Ahhh but that would not be FUN either)

Take it or leave it .

204 posted on 12/12/2002 12:57:51 PM PST by RnMomof7
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 199 | View Replies]

To: Dead Corpse
We need to lock you in a room with Dr. Ruth for about a week.

A "Zexual" placemarker.

205 posted on 12/12/2002 12:59:37 PM PST by Junior
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 200 | View Replies]

To: BuddhaBoy
As for me I say:

"It may be dark and lonely work, but someone has to do it."

206 posted on 12/12/2002 1:01:47 PM PST by tcostell
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 59 | View Replies]

To: tcostell
Well, if it is lonely, then I admire your flexibility.

Just kidding. LOL!

207 posted on 12/12/2002 1:07:43 PM PST by BuddhaBoy
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 206 | View Replies]

To: Sangamon Kid
So this only affects women? Have they studied gay men too?
208 posted on 12/12/2002 1:09:13 PM PST by Contra
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: RnMomof7
IF you read the article it speaks to an increase in the FEMALE rate increase ....an indicator that the woman is at risk because she is the recepticle...

I DID read the article, and the inescapable conclusion is that *IF* the HPV virus causes mouth cancer as well as cervical cancer, then a man who has cunnilingus with an infected WOMAN has an equal chance of getting mouth cancer. Even though he is a MAN. Because a mouth is a mouth.

Okay. First of all there is a very small number of cases. Three thousand out of fifty-eight million. According to the article, they believe HPV could be responsible for possibly twenty percent of those three thousand cases. They never said ALL of the twenty percent were females, did they? In fact, even with the increase in females, twice as many men still get it.

The increase in female cases could be due to practices other than your garden-variety premarital sex. Some teenage girls have a ridiculously high number of sex partners, and drink, and smoke, and use drugs. The more partners, the more chance you're going to catch something.

I simply find the hand wringing by men interesting ..more afraid of losing their favorite sex than the potential risk to a woman

If they don't have the virus (the woman can find out by being screened herself), why should they "lose" anything, and what would the woman be risking?

(dare I say a condom would remove the risk? Ahhh but that would not be FUN either)

To be quite frank, this woman would find *that* disgusting, and not the least bit fun, so if it had to be done with a condom, I guarantee you it wouldn't get done at ALL...

209 posted on 12/12/2002 1:24:37 PM PST by hellinahandcart
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 204 | View Replies]

To: RJCogburn
"the Taliban division of FR"

Hey, I'll take the Taliban Division any day over the Caligula Corps.

210 posted on 12/12/2002 1:30:49 PM PST by HumanaeVitae
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 82 | View Replies]

To: HumanaeVitae
So my wife and I are members of the 'Caligula Corps' because we enjoy oral sex? You can not be serious.
211 posted on 12/12/2002 2:03:09 PM PST by Karsus
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 210 | View Replies]

To: All
"We know smoking and drinking is probably the cause in 80%"

how do we know it isnt the drink befor and the smoke after causing it?
212 posted on 12/12/2002 2:10:24 PM PST by MacDorcha
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: hellinahandcart
If they don't have the virus (the woman can find out by being screened herself), why should they "lose" anything, and what would the woman be risking?

Ever see how beautiful a woman with a resected head and neck or mouth is? A very different thing than a resected cervix..But why let that stop you?

213 posted on 12/12/2002 2:13:14 PM PST by RnMomof7
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 209 | View Replies]

To: Piltdown_Woman
Egads!

I don't know which is more disturbing; the article itself, or the comments on this thread by the prudes who are scared to death of the idea that somebody, somewhere is having a good time.

214 posted on 12/12/2002 2:17:17 PM PST by longshadow
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 178 | View Replies]

To: Karsus
Careful. Yes, they can.

HV would rather not think about others having unsanctioned fun.

215 posted on 12/12/2002 2:17:19 PM PST by Dead Corpse
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 211 | View Replies]

To: hellinahandcart
Hmmmm...... But, but....

According to His Slickness, it isn't sex. He said so Hisself.

216 posted on 12/12/2002 2:21:44 PM PST by sauropod
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 19 | View Replies]

To: Dead Corpse
"would rather not think about others having unsanctioned fun."

Seems to me from the people I've met from that end of the spectrum are pretty well conditioned as opposed to those that are fairly well adjusted. Can anyone really find fault in the gift of giving your faithfull spouse pleasure?

Everything in moderation and tolerance and safety !!!
217 posted on 12/12/2002 2:32:56 PM PST by NYTexan
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 215 | View Replies]

To: Bella_Bru
Yet another good reason to be a (small "L") libertarian.
218 posted on 12/12/2002 2:37:08 PM PST by austinTparty
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 33 | View Replies]

To: u-89
If the woman feels put out in a marital relationship (e.g. she doesn't want to but feels pressured to) and doesn't do it out of love, then the man is guilty of selfishness in the sexual relationship, is what I was saying. Selfishness is sinful, in any area. Not that we aren't all selfish of course.

But continuing on this way, if she is opposed, is likely to sap the woman of a lot of interest overall.
219 posted on 12/12/2002 2:47:34 PM PST by Terriergal
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 180 | View Replies]

To: u-89
BTW I never said there weren't some women that like it. It's just that overall most of the women I've talked to kind of groan exasperatedly about the subject.
220 posted on 12/12/2002 2:49:03 PM PST by Terriergal
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 180 | View Replies]


Navigation: use the links below to view more comments.
first previous 1-20 ... 181-200201-220221-240 ... 341-349 next last

Disclaimer: Opinions posted on Free Republic are those of the individual posters and do not necessarily represent the opinion of Free Republic or its management. All materials posted herein are protected by copyright law and the exemption for fair use of copyrighted works.

Free Republic
Browse · Search
News/Activism
Topics · Post Article

FreeRepublic, LLC, PO BOX 9771, FRESNO, CA 93794
FreeRepublic.com is powered by software copyright 2000-2008 John Robinson