Free Republic
Browse · Search
News/Activism
Topics · Post Article

Skip to comments.

Oral sex linked to cancer of the mouth
Suday Herald (UK) ^ | unknown | Sarah-Kate Templeton

Posted on 12/12/2002 8:13:17 AM PST by Sangamon Kid

Oral sex linked to cancer of the mouth

By Sarah-Kate Templeton

New research to be published next year will provide powerful evidence that oral sex can cause mouth cancer.

Doctors who first suggested a form of mouth cancer could be linked to the same sexually transmitted virus that causes cervical cancer have found more data to back their controversial theory. Two years ago, the group from Johns Hopkins University in the US published a paper suggesting the human papilloma virus (HPV), the cause of most cervical cancer, can also cause mouth cancer.

A new study, to be published in six months' time, will confirm this research, according to Dr Maura Gillison, an oncologist and member of the Johns Hopkins group. The news comes as Scottish mouth cancer experts are calling for research to be done here into the suspected link with oral sex.

David Soutar, president of the British Association of Head and Neck Oncologists, said: 'We were involved in a pilot study which suggested that this is certainly something that we should look into.

'It should be investigated further, particularly in people who don't have any of the risk factors such as smoking and drinking.

'One of the things that has interested me over the past 15 years is the increase in the number of women with oral cancer. It used to be five men to one woman but it is now about two men to one woman. What we do not know is whether this is all down to smoking.

'When I see the increase in women with oral cancer I think oral sex has to be one of the causes. We also have to find out why the age group suffering from oral cancer is becoming younger. Ideally, we would want to look at the under-45s.'

Mr Soutar, a consultant plastic surgeon at Canniesburn Hospital and the Nuffield Hospital, both in Glasgow, says it is difficult to find people willing to discuss their sexual behaviour, but says we have to consider the possibility sexually transmitted viruses are one of the causes.

Finding out whether HPV is a cause of mouth cancer is all the more pressing now that new treatments are being developed to fight cervical cancer. A vaccine to stop cervical cancer could become available within five years and doctors believe a similar vaccine could protect against some oral cancers.

The vaccine works by boosting the immune system against strains of HPV. The vaccine against cervical cancer will be targeted at girls of about 12 or 13, before they become sexually active and vulnerable to HPV.

But Soutar warns that, unlike cervical cancer where most forms of the disease are caused by HPV, the sexually transmitted virus could only be responsible for less than 20% of mouth cancer cases. He said targeting a vaccine would therefore be more difficult.

'If we could identify the sub-group this would be of benefit. We know smoking and drinking is probably the cause in 80% of cases so we couldn't use it in the same way as the vaccine against cervical cancer. This would only be a small proportion of those who have oral cancer.'

In the past decade in Scotland there has been an almost 50% increase in oral cancer among under-45s, and in the last 40 years a fourfold increase in younger patients suffering from it. Oral cancer affects 3000 people in the UK each year and the problem is worse north of the border.

www.omfsaboutface.co.uk/ aware.htm
www.cancerresearchuk.org


TOPICS: Culture/Society; Front Page News; United Kingdom
KEYWORDS: cancer; catholiclist; fellatio; homosexuality; morals; mouthcancer; multiplesexpartners; oralsex; semen; sex; sodomy; values; wellthissucks
Navigation: use the links below to view more comments.
first previous 1-20 ... 121-140141-160161-180 ... 341-349 next last
To: Bella_Bru
I bet they get Mai Tai's too. But, of course, alcohol free. ;-)

You won't really have eternal life ... it'll just feel that way. ;o)

141 posted on 12/12/2002 10:36:41 AM PST by malakhi
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 112 | View Replies]

To: truenospinzone
the ridiculous conclusion that, say, oral sex is a privilege, not a right.

Rights cannot be positive; they can only be negative.

We do not have a right to oral sex because that would require someone to provide it, and if no one is willing, then someone must be enslaved to provide it.

142 posted on 12/12/2002 10:38:00 AM PST by Chemist_Geek
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 123 | View Replies]

To: NYTexan
BTTT

Bump To The Tonsils?

143 posted on 12/12/2002 10:40:43 AM PST by AshleyMontagu
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 122 | View Replies]

To: AshleyMontagu
ROTFLMAO!!!!
144 posted on 12/12/2002 10:42:39 AM PST by NeoCaveman
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 143 | View Replies]

To: xsmommy; hellinahandcart
well i have been married 17 years and xshub has finally caught on that diamonds do wonders!

I've finally figured out a way to get my wife a nice-sized rock or two. First, I kill myself. Then, my wife finds the note explaining that she should point her browser here. And it doesn't cost me a penny...

145 posted on 12/12/2002 10:43:49 AM PST by general_re
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 139 | View Replies]

To: AshleyMontagu
LOL, Ill never think about BTTT quite the same again.
146 posted on 12/12/2002 10:45:00 AM PST by muggs
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 143 | View Replies]

To: general_re
well you'd be with her always, and she would look dang good with a rock on her hand! ; ) it's a win-win proposition ; )
147 posted on 12/12/2002 10:46:01 AM PST by xsmommy
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 145 | View Replies]

To: AshleyMontagu
or B-tween the T**'s
148 posted on 12/12/2002 10:46:08 AM PST by NYTexan
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 143 | View Replies]

To: Chemist_Geek
You are correct, and I mistakenly edited out the prevalent portion of that statement - the ridiculous conclusion was in fact that oral sex was "sinful" BECAUSE it was not a right.
149 posted on 12/12/2002 10:47:40 AM PST by truenospinzone
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 142 | View Replies]

To: RnMomof7
The problem is it is always the woman that ends up "paying" ..so I guess the pleasure of men is more important than the lives of women..we will remember that for future reference..

Only women get cervical cancer you know. The good old missionary position also leaves them affected and only them. Plenty of men and women who enjoy cunninglus, which would leave a man with oral cancer as well.

150 posted on 12/12/2002 10:48:12 AM PST by MattAMiller
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 72 | View Replies]

To: MattAMiller
So nice of you to care about the well being of your wife(??)...the specific virus being discussed in this article is a risk only to women..
151 posted on 12/12/2002 10:52:48 AM PST by RnMomof7
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 150 | View Replies]

To: CaliforniaOkie
Shouldn't Monica file an lawsuit against Bill Clinton?

If people can sue the tobaco companies for getting cancer from smoking on their cigarettes, then shouldn't Monica be able to sue Clinton for getting cancer from smoking on his...er.... cigar?
152 posted on 12/12/2002 10:55:09 AM PST by Dr._Joseph_Warren
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 43 | View Replies]

To: Wolfie
Lights out, missionary position only, through a hole cut in the sheet - Those are my rules. Immortality, here I come (so to speak).

Can it be a latex sheet?

153 posted on 12/12/2002 10:59:46 AM PST by Britton J Wingfield
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 2 | View Replies]

To: BuddhaBoy
This article is not going to deter me. As long as I am alive and have a face, there will always be a place for good looking women to sit.
154 posted on 12/12/2002 11:01:24 AM PST by vetvetdoug
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 110 | View Replies]

To: realpatriot71
Fellatio is a corruption of the sex act, and hence it is a sin against nature, as are all acts of sodomy. In fact, it is an even worse sin than pre-marital sexual intercourse, since the latter is merely a sin of passion. That's why Dante places sodomites, which include those who engage in fellatio, in a lower ring in Hell than those guilty of mere lust.
155 posted on 12/12/2002 11:07:51 AM PST by traditionalist
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 95 | View Replies]

To: angelo
I think we need a poll.

Eternal life WITHOUT Oral Sex or 60-70 years on earth with Moderate Oral Sex?

Vote early and often.

156 posted on 12/12/2002 11:08:09 AM PST by BuddhaBoy
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 141 | View Replies]

To: traditionalist
And what do you do for fun? Rip the whiskers off of kittens?
157 posted on 12/12/2002 11:09:13 AM PST by BuddhaBoy
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 155 | View Replies]

To: truenospinzone
was in fact that oral sex was "sinful" BECAUSE it was not a right.

Now THAT's absurd. If it is, indeed, a sin, then there are other reasons for it...

158 posted on 12/12/2002 11:13:56 AM PST by Chemist_Geek
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 149 | View Replies]

To: Terriergal
I do it for a lady because it pleases me to please her, not as a transaction. I hope she does it for the same reason. People who care about each other sometimes do things that they don't like because they care that much.

Like when I sat through "Steel Magnolias"...
159 posted on 12/12/2002 11:16:33 AM PST by alpowolf
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 88 | View Replies]

To: traditionalist
Please provide sources for your statment that Fellatio is a corruption of the sex act.
160 posted on 12/12/2002 11:31:06 AM PST by Karsus
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 155 | View Replies]


Navigation: use the links below to view more comments.
first previous 1-20 ... 121-140141-160161-180 ... 341-349 next last

Disclaimer: Opinions posted on Free Republic are those of the individual posters and do not necessarily represent the opinion of Free Republic or its management. All materials posted herein are protected by copyright law and the exemption for fair use of copyrighted works.

Free Republic
Browse · Search
News/Activism
Topics · Post Article

FreeRepublic, LLC, PO BOX 9771, FRESNO, CA 93794
FreeRepublic.com is powered by software copyright 2000-2008 John Robinson