Free Republic
Browse · Search
News/Activism
Topics · Post Article

To: realpatriot71
Fellatio is a corruption of the sex act, and hence it is a sin against nature, as are all acts of sodomy. In fact, it is an even worse sin than pre-marital sexual intercourse, since the latter is merely a sin of passion. That's why Dante places sodomites, which include those who engage in fellatio, in a lower ring in Hell than those guilty of mere lust.
155 posted on 12/12/2002 11:07:51 AM PST by traditionalist
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 95 | View Replies ]


To: traditionalist
And what do you do for fun? Rip the whiskers off of kittens?
157 posted on 12/12/2002 11:09:13 AM PST by BuddhaBoy
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 155 | View Replies ]

To: traditionalist
Please provide sources for your statment that Fellatio is a corruption of the sex act.
160 posted on 12/12/2002 11:31:06 AM PST by Karsus
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 155 | View Replies ]

To: traditionalist
The indoctrination has gone well, has it not?

Last time I checked Dante wasn't an author of any Biblical book. In fact, Inferno was a satire. Maybe this was lost on you?

165 posted on 12/12/2002 11:47:16 AM PST by realpatriot71
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 155 | View Replies ]

To: traditionalist
Fellatio is a corruption of the sex act, and hence it is a sin against nature

You seem to be of the opinion that sexual intercourse is strictly for procreation is that correct? Then by definition coitus interruptous is a corruption of the act and is therfore sinfull as well. And what if fellatio is performed as a stimulant and not as a complete act unto itself? would it be ok in this case if "formal" intercourse were the end result? Is manual maniplutation also sinful if it ends in ejaculation? I suppose using breasts for "deviant" purposes is really heinous then, eh? I never understood how anything a man and woman could do together is considered unnatural. It seems to come pretty naturally to most of us.

166 posted on 12/12/2002 11:54:49 AM PST by u-89
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 155 | View Replies ]

To: traditionalist
Fellatio is a corruption of the sex act, and hence it is a sin against nature, as are all acts of sodomy. In fact, it is an even worse sin than pre-marital sexual intercourse, since the latter is merely a sin of passion. That's why Dante places sodomites, which include those who engage in fellatio, in a lower ring in Hell than those guilty of mere lust.

Yeah, but can we use a warm loaf of bread?

283 posted on 12/12/2002 7:56:44 PM PST by DAnconia55
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 155 | View Replies ]

To: traditionalist
"Fellatio is a corruption of the sex act, and hence it is a sin against nature, as are all acts of sodomy. In fact, it is an even worse sin than pre-marital sexual intercourse, since the latter is merely a sin of passion. That's why Dante places sodomites, which include those who engage in fellatio, in a lower ring in Hell than those guilty of mere lust."


Wow. just....WOW.

307 posted on 12/13/2002 6:59:15 AM PST by FeliciaCat
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 155 | View Replies ]

To: traditionalist
That's why Dante places sodomites, which include those who engage in fellatio, in a lower ring in Hell than those guilty of mere lust.

So you actually believe "The Inferno" is non-fiction?

313 posted on 12/13/2002 8:53:44 AM PST by laredo44
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 155 | View Replies ]

Free Republic
Browse · Search
News/Activism
Topics · Post Article


FreeRepublic, LLC, PO BOX 9771, FRESNO, CA 93794
FreeRepublic.com is powered by software copyright 2000-2008 John Robinson