Posted on 12/11/2002 1:48:28 PM PST by Saundra Duffy
FOR IMMEDIATE RELEASE FROM CAMPAIGN FOR CALIFORNIA FAMILIES www.savecalifornia.com
December 3, 2002
MORE HOMOSEXUAL POLITICIANS REVEAL NEW FACE OF DEMOCRATIC PARTY Laird, Leno Are First Openly Gay California State Assemblymen
Sacramento – Two homosexual men have become the first openly gay assemblymen in the California State Legislature. At a State Capitol ceremony on Monday, John Laird of Santa Cruz and Mark Leno of San Francisco were sworn in as the first male homosexual legislators in California history.
“The Democratic Party should rename itself the homosexual drag queen party, because that’s what it has become in recent years,” said Randy Thomasson, executive director of Campaign for California Families, a statewide nonprofit, nonpartisan family issues leadership organization. “Sadly, the radical gay activists are intent upon taking away the rights of average citizens. More homosexual activists as politicians mean more attacks on the sanctity of marriage, religious freedom, parental rights and the Boy Scouts.”
Increasing the self-proclaimed “Lavender Caucus” to five members, Laird and Leno join three previously-elected lesbian activist legislators: Jackie Goldberg of Los Angeles (Assembly), Christine Kehoe of San Diego (Assembly) and Sheila James Kuehl of Santa Monica (state Senate).
In recent years, the California Democratic Party (CDP) has become a loud advocate of homosexuality, bisexuality and transsexuality. Since 1999, Democrat state legislators have passed, and Governor Gray Davis has signed, more than 15 bills promoting the gay and transsexual agenda. Both the California Democratic Party and numerous California state and federal Democratic politicians opposed the Protection of Marriage Initiative (Proposition 22) on the March 2000 ballot. That same year, at the Democratic Party’s national convention in Los Angeles, many party members booed the Boy Scouts for being allowed to lead the Pledge of Allegiance.
In April 2001, the CDP passed a resolution officially supporting “civil unions” or Vermont-style homosexual marriage. In October 2001, Governor Gray Davis signed legislation awarding more than a dozen rights of marriage to homosexual “domestic partners.” During the recently-concluded 2002 election, Art Torres, the chairman of the California Democratic Party, tried to force the removal of a radio ad which educated listeners about the gay agenda targeting schoolchildren.
“The homosexual and transsexual activists have hijacked the California Democratic Party and programmed the minds of Democrat legislators to push and promote their radical agenda, even to the point of overturning the people’s vote on marriage," Thomasson said. “More homosexual legislators will mean more of their special interest agenda. This is bad news for the rights of parents and average citizens.”
# # #
CAMPAIGN FOR CALIFORNIA FAMILIES (CCF) is a 501(c)(4) nonprofit, nonpartisan family issues leadership organization serving families in this state and across America. Sign up today for CCF's free email updates. Remember that your partnership empowers CCF to work to restore family-friendly values to government and society. Please join with us by sending a gift of any size to:
Campaign for California Families Fighting to Restore Family-Friendly Values P.O. Box 782, Sacramento, CA 95812 (916) 443-1410 www.savecalifornia.com
One hundred percent of CCF's resources can be used to boldly influence government on your family's behalf, therefore gifts are not tax deductible.
The only Rocky Mountain state that has antidiscrimination/special rights (and only in GOVERNMENT employment) is Montana.
Bum slapping falls ouside the domain of logic.
Read the post again Maelstrom. You'll see that I'm making a sarcastic reference to the illegitimate, revisionist definition of the word 'gay' when I say "I don't care...".
"...While your family is being molested, you will be chastized for being intolerent..."
LOL!
Maybe so. But I won't be aware of the 'chastisement' inasmuch as I'll be dead.
As will be the first, and maybe second, wave of those whose intention it was to "molest my family".
"...Yes, many gay men consider little girl toddlers in diapers as little tramps begging for "it". I've seen it up close and personal, and it isn't just a few, it's a significant percentage that cannot be brushed off..."
Given that Butt-Rangers are, by definition, pathologically unbalanced sexual deviates of the first order I wouldn't doubt for an instant that there are a certain percentage of them who would -in addition to sticking their gnarled pee-pee in their buddy's nether region- also enjoy preying on a little girl.
Or a dog...
Or a watermelon...
I doubt it - only "gays", and a few others who have no clear self-identity would support same. Besides, what "rights" are you talking about? As far as I'm concerned, "rights" are constitutionally based and for EVERYONE, not lifestyle/behavior based for a few deviants!!
Said "gay" support, of course comes from the deep knowledge of the error of their ways. The stronger the subconcious feeling of wrongness, the more vocal, public and energetic the defense of the deviant behavior. It's really quite sad!
BTW, never saw a gay, as in deviant, gay, as in happy - all know in their heart of hearts that they are making a dam*ning lifestyle choice and, as a result, are actually quite sad deep down. Oh, they ACT all happy and sensitive, and all that, but in moments of introspection (they slip and do this occasionally), you can see the real, underlying torment (and it's a torment from within, not caused by "bigotry" or condemnation from without!).
Remember my originally stated "position" on this (no vaseline required): I don't tell anybody what life choices to make for themselves, and I don't expect anyone to tell me what life choices to make for myself. Leave me alone and I'll leave alone! Keep what is supposed to be private just that, PRIVATE, and we'll all just get along.
Facts is facts - I don't hate ANYBODY, and I'm not attacking you, "ItsJeff"; I'm merely stating facts. I will admit that I wouldn't cut a muslim any breaks (!), but I don't go around "bashing" ANYONE in any way (except, maybe, islamics - LOL!). Not hating, however, does NOT mean I accept everything and I have no doubts about not accepting even the slightest aspect of the B-F'r agenda. Keep it in the bedroom, fine! Bring it into my kid's classroom, and that's NOT fine!
Our new governor never admitted her butchery; but she advocates legalizing domestic partnerships. Conservative gays do NOT push their lifestyle in other people's faces.
The 14th amendment says, in addition to applying the Bill of Rights to the states, that everyone will be treated equally under the law. IOW, no special laws for any group of citizens.
The Bill of Rights has clearly defined freedom of association as an inalienable right. This includes who a employer wants to have representing his business.
It really doesn't matter what laws you try to pass, the inalienable right remains - you're just trampling on it with laws that infringe on that right.
Oh, and by the way, there is a natural human revulsion to homosexual behavior, because it is a genetic aberration.
Just wanted to be clear on that one.
Disclaimer: Opinions posted on Free Republic are those of the individual posters and do not necessarily represent the opinion of Free Republic or its management. All materials posted herein are protected by copyright law and the exemption for fair use of copyrighted works.