Skip to comments.
The best tank in the world?
World's Armed Forces Site ^
| 13 November 2002
| Maverick
Posted on 12/11/2002 11:33:26 AM PST by sonofatpatcher2
What do you all think is the best tank in the world, now and before of cause.
I´m from Germany so for me it´s clear. The Leopard 2A5 ist the best tank the world has ever known. We also produced some great tanks like the Tiger or Panther, for Expert´s the Henschel Sturmtiger and the Köngistiger are the ancestors of all modern tanks and the Us and Russia have stolen our ideas.
TOPICS: Your Opinion/Questions
KEYWORDS: abramsm1a2; blackeagle; challenger2; leclerc; leopard2; m1a3; mainbattletanks; merkavamk4; nofuninstalingrad; stalingrad; t34; t80latestversion; t90; t95
Navigation: use the links below to view more comments.
first previous 1-20 ... 61-80, 81-100, 101-120 ... 141-158 next last
To: sticker
A Stalin tank would whoop a T-34.
To: Hacksaw
Nope, While we did provie the Ruskies a lot of material including tanks, the western tanks they were given were pretty much disliked by their crews. They knew they were inferior to their own T-34 and KV-1 tanks let alone the german Panzers
82
posted on
12/11/2002 1:44:37 PM PST
by
BobinIL
To: Gorzaloon
The French tank has the most comfortable suspension and the most comfortable toilets... What? Nothing about the speed in Reverse?
The main gun barrels are used to age fine Roquefort and Brie.
To: WhiskeyPapa
We gave the Russians about 4,000 Shermans. Of the top of my head, they made @ 33,000 T-34s. The memory of this comes from reading "The Good War" in which a sailor in the Merchant Marine tells about trying to deliver a supply through freezing seas. A good book.
84
posted on
12/11/2002 1:48:24 PM PST
by
Hacksaw
To: Eternal_Bear
In late 41 Hitler was shown captured Soviet KV-1 and T-34 tanks. "How could such savages produce such tanks!" he roared. Ah, the T-34. My sentimental favorite, used by Soviet bastards to crush Romanian bastards in weakened frontal positions and surround an entire army of Nazi bastards, in the great Operation Uranus, saving Stalingrad and turning the tide of war.
To: BobinIL
Nope, While we did provie the Ruskies a lot of material including tanks, the western tanks they were given were pretty much disliked by their crews. I read somewhere that they liked the Shermans; I think they may have only gotten the ones with the M-23 turret/76MM gun.
The Sherman was more ergonomic than Soviet tanks by a long sight.
Walt
To: SandfleaCSC
The beloved T-34 (lamentably named for Stalin himself).
To: Petronski
Ah, the T-34. My sentimental favorite, used by Soviet bastards to crush Romanian bastards in weakened frontal positions and surround an entire army of Nazi bastards, in the great Operation Uranus, saving Stalingrad and turning the tide of war. yeah, yeah, yeah.
Well, Sherman equipped units could run rings around Uranus.
Sorry, couldn't resist. :)
Walt
To: WhiskeyPapa
The Abrams uses Chobham (sp)armor This isn't entirely true. While it is true that the Abrams (and most truly modern MBTs) use Chobham-like armor, the US made a number of technological improvements to the basic Chobham concept which are unique to our tanks. In essence, we used our superior materials engineering capability (which the Europeans can't touch) and greatly extended the performance envelope of the basic concept.
The British can probably be credited with the core concept, but we probably have the most advanced implementation of the concept and have made a number of improvements to it.
89
posted on
12/11/2002 1:54:15 PM PST
by
tortoise
To: Hacksaw
My friend had a Camaro without a reverse gear - we would simply push it out of the parking stop if we were not on a hill. Was it an automatic? A buddy of my with a '74 Caprice Classic (the 'Taco Wagon,' because it looked so 'barrio') lost his reverse gear too. We later learned that the transmission (a Torqueflite 350 IIRC) had a NYLON reverse band!
2+ tons of vehicle, and a friggen' NYLON band to handle the reverse clutch!
To: WhiskeyPapa
Well, Sherman equipped units could run rings around Uranus.
To: ThomasJefferson
The Leopard 2A5 ist the best tank the world has ever known. It didn't keep the Allies from defeating the filty Nazi bastards
60 years too late to help the filthy Nazi bastards.
To: Maximum Leader
The turbine doesn't burn that much more fuel than the diesel, it's just that it burns the fuel whether it's moving or not.
If you can convince the tank crew to shut off the engine when they are stationary, it's about as fuel efficient as the diesels.
I've seen commanders try - I've never seen them succeed.
94
posted on
12/11/2002 2:05:12 PM PST
by
jdege
To: Petronski
My bad: The T34 was not named for Stalin. Phew.
To: Petronski
Someone should post a picture of the big dog that was named after Salin
96
posted on
12/11/2002 2:13:33 PM PST
by
BobinIL
To: Petronski
LOL! The JS-1 and JS-2 were named for Stalin.
97
posted on
12/11/2002 2:14:10 PM PST
by
SAMWolf
To: WhiskeyPapa
IMHO, the Pzkw-IV is underated. It may not have been the best tank, but it stayed in the war from 1939 until 1945 and was able to be up-armored and up-gunned to meet the new improvements in enemy armor. It was able to hold it's own until the very end when the JS-1 and JS-2 showed up.
It was the real "Workhorse" of the German PanzerTruppen.
98
posted on
12/11/2002 2:18:25 PM PST
by
SAMWolf
To: ThomasJefferson
Nope. The tank didn't help against the Russian winter and the Russian hoards.
To: sonofatpatcher2
Tanks are useless in 21st century warfare.
Navigation: use the links below to view more comments.
first previous 1-20 ... 61-80, 81-100, 101-120 ... 141-158 next last
Disclaimer:
Opinions posted on Free Republic are those of the individual
posters and do not necessarily represent the opinion of Free Republic or its
management. All materials posted herein are protected by copyright law and the
exemption for fair use of copyrighted works.
FreeRepublic.com is powered by software copyright 2000-2008 John Robinson