Free Republic
Browse · Search
News/Activism
Topics · Post Article

Skip to comments.

Yes, Virginia, there are weapons of mass destruction
Orlando Sentinel ^ | December 6, 2002 | Gary McKechnie

Posted on 12/06/2002 4:41:09 PM PST by Gore_ War_ Vet

Dear Editor:

I am 8 years old. Some of my little friends say that Iraq has no weapons of mass destruction. Papa says, "If you hear it from the White House, it's so." Please tell me the truth: Does Iraq have weapons of mass destruction?

Virginia O'Hanlon

Virginia,

Your little friends are wrong. They have been affected by the skepticism of a skeptical age. They think that nothing can be which is not proven.

Think of the wonderful things we learn from the White House. We hear of an immediate and inevitable attack by Iraq; of its nuclear capabilities and links to al-Qaeda. While no proof has been offered, does this mean their rhetoric was invalid?

Not believe in weapons of mass destruction! You might as well not believe the president politicized the war on terrorism. While no one yet sees evidence of these weapons, that is no sign that there are none. The most real things in the world are those that neither children nor men can see. Did you or your papa ever see Ken Lay slip millions in stolen Enron funds to the Republican Party? Of course not, but that's no proof that he did not do so. Do Iraqi officials work with al-Qaeda? Again, it may not seem true to a child such as yourself, but on Sunday mornings Donald Rumsfeld and Condoleezza Rice will tell you that this is so.

Sweet princess, in this magical world we may hear Saddam Hussein has no nuclear capabilities, yet months later we are told that he does. Although our government shows us no evidence and offers no proof, we cannot question what we are told when officials assure us what they say is true.

No weapons of mass destruction? Poppycock.

Virginia, we can agree that Saddam Hussein is a very bad man, and he may very well possess terrible weapons. Our Republican and Democratic senators and congressmen all hope this is so, for it helps them avoid facing America's domestic difficulties. Why, wouldn't you agree it is far simpler to fight an evil enemy than clean up our environment or foster renewable energy sources? Certainly! This is why even if Hussein complies or U.N. inspectors cannot locate these weapons, this news will be most unwelcome. So in a twinkle, we'll discover that our reasons for war have changed and our history of justifiable military defense is no longer a prudent policy. Why do we do this? Ah, that is a mystery to children and adults alike.

We cannot debate; we cannot inquire; we cannot expect to be shown evidence. When a popular president and his secretaries and our wise old attorney general tell us to have faith in what we are told, so we must afford them our faith.

Until then, Virginia, believe in weapons of mass destruction. Believe, child, or you and any others who ask questions will be branded un-American.

Gary McKechnie lives in Mount Dora. The preceding is based on the 1897 editorial in the New York Sun that declared, "Yes, Virginia, there is a Santa Claus."

Copyright © 2002, Orlando Sentinel

(Excerpt) Read more at orlandosentinel.com ...


TOPICS: Activism/Chapters; Constitution/Conservatism; Editorial; Foreign Affairs; Government; News/Current Events; Your Opinion/Questions
KEYWORDS:
Navigation: use the links below to view more comments.
first 1-2021-4041-6061-72 next last
Hooray!

This editorial has done it, I am finally convinced that our impending attack on Iraq is justified.

I no longer feel left out for thinking that we should have justification or provocation for attacking a sovereign country on the other side of the world. Gone are my conservative bonds.

I must confess that for some time I have felt like a FRINO, but now I am so overcome with globalism that I am excited and hope to help select the next country for us to attack. Proof, Smoof. Kill'em all and let God sort'em out.

Gotta go write my list to Santa.

FReep on!

1 posted on 12/06/2002 4:41:09 PM PST by Gore_ War_ Vet
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | View Replies]

To: Gore_ War_ Vet
I've already got a list of countries we should squash.
I'll sell it to the highest bidder.
2 posted on 12/06/2002 4:48:29 PM PST by Darksheare
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: Dave Dilegge; leadpenny; sauropod; Doctor Raoul; The Glaswegian; ELS; Marylander; TBP; ...
I'm back!
3 posted on 12/06/2002 4:48:54 PM PST by Gore_ War_ Vet
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: Gore_ War_ Vet
Wow, I guess all those dead, gassed Iraqis I saw on TV yesterday were really waiting for Prince Charming to come kiss them and wake them up!!!!
4 posted on 12/06/2002 4:49:00 PM PST by joltinjoe
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: Gore_ War_ Vet
... for attacking a sovereign country ...
Sovereign ideed. And sovereignty trumps human rights. (Yet more Saddam apologetics. When did the political left become so enamoured of tyrants?)
5 posted on 12/06/2002 4:51:34 PM PST by Asclepius
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: Darksheare
I think Pakistan or India would be neat.

If we wanted we could start it and just stand back and watch.
6 posted on 12/06/2002 4:52:07 PM PST by Gore_ War_ Vet
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 2 | View Replies]

To: Gore_ War_ Vet
On a scale of one to 10, I'd give you a two. A sense of irony and sarcasm present, but self-promotion detracts. Plus the article is childish, literally, and of poor quality. Not a good sounding board. And clunky use of the word globalism. One might think you don't have a clue to what that means in practice.
7 posted on 12/06/2002 4:52:21 PM PST by Shermy
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: Gore_ War_ Vet
I am finally convinced that our impending attack on Iraq is justified.

Better late than never.

8 posted on 12/06/2002 4:52:41 PM PST by San Jacinto
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: joltinjoe
I hear China has nuclear capacity
9 posted on 12/06/2002 4:54:12 PM PST by Gore_ War_ Vet
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 4 | View Replies]

To: San Jacinto
Amen!
10 posted on 12/06/2002 4:55:06 PM PST by Gore_ War_ Vet
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 8 | View Replies]

To: Gore_ War_ Vet
I'm back!

I was wondering what that smell was.

11 posted on 12/06/2002 4:55:19 PM PST by hole_n_one
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 3 | View Replies]

To: Gore_ War_ Vet

Bunch of


12 posted on 12/06/2002 4:55:24 PM PST by Liberal Bob
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: Shermy
I am honored to be in the presense of an intellect such as yours.

I am not worthy.

It's great to feel like a FReeper again.

P.S. Thanks for not using four letter words.
13 posted on 12/06/2002 5:00:21 PM PST by Gore_ War_ Vet
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 7 | View Replies]

To: hole_n_one
We cannot debate; we cannot inquire; we cannot expect to be shown evidence. When a popular president and his secretaries and our wise old attorney general tell us to have faith in what we are told, so we must afford them our faith.
14 posted on 12/06/2002 5:04:46 PM PST by Gore_ War_ Vet
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 11 | View Replies]

To: Gore_ War_ Vet
I am honored to be in the presense of an intellect such as yours. I am not worthy.

If you hang a picture, expect people to look.

15 posted on 12/06/2002 5:08:28 PM PST by Shermy
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 13 | View Replies]

To: Gore_ War_ Vet
Why do you doubt them, or that Saddam is a clear threat to the stability of the Middle East and a threat to all in the West?
16 posted on 12/06/2002 5:08:32 PM PST by habs4ever
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 14 | View Replies]

To: Gore_ War_ Vet
India, then Pakistan. With India out of teh way, Pakistans back door is uncovered.
Then Iran, because they've been pretty cocky lately.
And then Cuba, just because. (I dunno, Just cause I feel like it?)
Sounds like a plan to me!
17 posted on 12/06/2002 5:10:58 PM PST by Darksheare
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 6 | View Replies]

To: habs4ever
Chinese, did I say Chinese?

BRB! Gotta go get dinner.
18 posted on 12/06/2002 5:14:10 PM PST by Gore_ War_ Vet
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 16 | View Replies]

To: habs4ever
Personally, I say we crush the whole place and watch what happens afterwards. I bet five that Saddam ends up in a male brothel.
I also say we pit match him against Osama when we catch him. (Right before we kill him.)
I know, it's sadistic to treat them like bugs in a jar. Shaking it to watch them fight, but it'd be so darn funny to get the arab nations to turn on one another like that...
Let them do our work for us.. if it could be done.
19 posted on 12/06/2002 5:15:03 PM PST by Darksheare
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 16 | View Replies]

To: Darksheare
I think something like that will be done...it take a bit of time and planning to remake a major zone in the world and do it without setting off hordes of other problems.

But, remaking the Middle East is the plan and it HAS to be done, for our collective security.
20 posted on 12/06/2002 5:20:57 PM PST by habs4ever
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 19 | View Replies]


Navigation: use the links below to view more comments.
first 1-2021-4041-6061-72 next last

Disclaimer: Opinions posted on Free Republic are those of the individual posters and do not necessarily represent the opinion of Free Republic or its management. All materials posted herein are protected by copyright law and the exemption for fair use of copyrighted works.

Free Republic
Browse · Search
News/Activism
Topics · Post Article

FreeRepublic, LLC, PO BOX 9771, FRESNO, CA 93794
FreeRepublic.com is powered by software copyright 2000-2008 John Robinson