Free Republic
Browse · Search
News/Activism
Topics · Post Article

Skip to comments.

NFL=Gratiutous Violence?
NEWSWEEK WEB | Thursday, 6 November 2002 | Mark Star

Posted on 12/05/2002 6:55:06 AM PST by yankeedame

‘Boom. And I Hit Him’

The NFL should immediately ban the gratuitous violence that our culture venerates. Otherwise, a tragedy is coming

NEWSWEEK WEB EXCLUSIVE

Nov. 29 — America is a reactive society, not a proactive one. We wait for a crisis and then maybe, just maybe, try to resolve it. It took a disputed presidential election to bring about ballot reform and a terrible terrorist attack to launch a dedicated battle against Osama bin Laden.

THEN THERE’S THE sports world. If enough young pitchers are hurt by rocket blasts off aluminum bats, some school associations belatedly move to ban them, as Massachusetts just did. When a young girl in Columbus, Ohio, dies, the unlucky victim of a stray puck fired into the stands, the NHL protects itself and its fans by putting up protective netting. Now there is a crisis brewing in the NFL, and it’s a shame that the league appears willing to wait for a tragedy before it does something about it. And make no mistake about it, that tragedy is coming. For the second week in a row, a player has been carried off the football field strapped to a gurney after a violent and gratuitously violent hit. Two weeks ago, it was Steelers quarterback Tommy Maddox; last Sunday, Packers lineman Chad Clifton. In both cases, the downed players initially had no feeling in their limbs. Both are expected to recover, though it isn’t clear when either will take the field again. What is clear is that the NFL should move immediately to ban the sort of sadistic play that our culture celebrates and which the NFL profits from with its highlight mania and the smashmouth video games it licenses. Everybody who saw Warren Sapp’s hit on Clifton—and, of course, we got to see it from every possible angle at every conceivable speed—understands that, under current NFL rules, it was legal. At the same time, it was the very definition of unnecessary roughness as well as the perfect illustration of a cheap shot. Clifton was chasing far behind a play and was helpless when Sapp picked him off from his blindside. Clifton’s injuries—torn hip ligaments, internal bleeding and possible spinal damage—are, at the very least, season ending. Sapp, following the game and a verbal confrontation with Green Bay coach Mike Sherman, admitted he targeted Clifton with a full recognition of what a devastating blow it was likely to be. “I was a heat-seeking missile,” Sapp said. “Boom, boom, boom—and I hit him.”

Even if Sapp, one of my favorite players for the joyous way he embraces the game, had not been so candid, his actions on the field later in the same game were revealing. Another Tampa Bay interception gave Sapp a second chance to wreak havoc as blocker. But this time, when he could have plowed quarterback Brett Favre into the ground—and with justification because it would have assured a touchdown—he took mercy on his rival and pal and ran right past him without so much as a love tap. Sherman’s indignant march on Sapp may have been foolishness, but the Green Bay coach got it 100 percent right in his post-game remarks on the Clifton hit. “It bothers me,” he said. “And I think it should bother the game of football as well.”

Of course, the standard disclaimer: we all know that football is a particularly dangerous game. And we know the NFL has, in fact, taken some righteous steps toward curbing the violence, particularly when it comes to protecting its pocketbook...uh, I mean its quarterbacks. Quarterback turned Sunday Night Football guru Joe Theisman, having suffered one of the most stomach-turning injuries ever in prime time, may have earned the right to disdain today’s ticky tacky roughing calls on behalf of the quarterback. But his nostalgia is misplaced. The league can’t do enough to protect the quarterbacks; already five legitimate Super Bowl contenders—St. Louis, Philadelphia, Denver, Miami and Pittsburgh—have lost quarterbacks to injury; a couple of those teams have already had two QBs go down.

Sapp’s intentions, sinister or not, are firmly rooted in NFL tradition. They weren’t appreciably different than those of Chuck Bednarik, who, in one of the most famous hits in NFL history, laid out Giants star Frank Gifford in 1960, knocking him senseless and out of football for an entire year. But yesteryear is increasingly irrelevant to this debate. Sapp is essentially a different species than Bednarik or other football players of his generation. Bednarik was a 230-pound linebacker, ferocious but something of a plodder. Sapp, though he’s listed at 303 lbs, is probably upwards of 330 and runs unconscionably fast for a man his size. Bigger, stronger and swifter is a potentially lethal combination.

Longtime New England Patriots fans here in my hometown understand this better than most. It was back in 1978 that a terrific young Pats receiver named Darryl Stingley ran into the crosshairs of a hard-hitting Raiders defensive back and notorious cheap-shot artist who called himself “Assassin.” Jack Tatum pulverized an open and exposed Stingley, who was running a crossing pattern in an exhibition game, breaking his neck. Stingley remains paralyzed from the neck down. Last season Patriots fans witnessed another near-horror when Drew Bledsoe, leveled along the sideline by Jets linebacker Mo Lewis, was rushed to the hospital with internal bleeding.

Those two situations, along with Sapp’s, represent the trinity of the legally lethal: receivers crossing over the middle; ball carriers on the verge of stepping out of bounds; and offensive players trailing behind the play after a turnover. They are hardly the only dangerous situations on the football field, but they are often among the most gratuitously so. They are designed to administer punishment more than anything else. And the simple solution is to make the most gratuitous of them—when the receiver is outstretched for a ball five feet over his head or a scrambling quarterback is one inch from stepping out of bounds—illegal. Unnecessary roughness, personal foul, 15 yards—the officials’ judgment call on the field backed up by the NFL’s videotape police with their full array of suspension powers.

Folks who like the NFL just like it is, or even more as it once was, will protest that it’s impossible to ask these athletes to hold back on their hits. But the truth is that we already ask sensational players to do things that boggle our minds. New rules or rule interpretations—the high strike in Major League baseball, the zone defense in the NBA, or the interference call in NHL—are adopted in many sports. Players reprogram themselves and adjust. Football players are capable of the discipline that requires them to settle for a firm shove on the sidelines or to pass up the devastating block on someone trailing 20 yards behind the play.

I will always remember what Jack Tatum said after the game in which Stingley was hurt. “What could I do?” he asked. “Injuries happen.” They certainly do. And they always will. But the NFL knows exactly what it can do to cut down on the likelihood of a lethal attack. Because when that tragic injury inevitably comes and the league asks, “What could we do?” the only conscionable answer will be “Absolutely everything possible.”

© 2002 Newsweek, Inc.


TOPICS: Front Page News; News/Current Events
KEYWORDS: natlfelonsleague
Navigation: use the links below to view more comments.
first 1-2021-4041-6061-80 ... 121-138 next last

1 posted on 12/05/2002 6:55:06 AM PST by yankeedame
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | View Replies]

To: yankeedame
"The league can’t do enough to protect the quarterbacks; already five legitimate Super Bowl contenders—St. Louis, Philadelphia, Denver, Miami and Pittsburgh—have lost quarterbacks to injury; a couple of those teams have already had two QBs go down..."

So maybe the league should just disallow hitting/tackling the quarterback at all. Two-hand touch? Hmmmm....
2 posted on 12/05/2002 7:08:18 AM PST by BaghdadBarney
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: BaghdadBarney
Clifton was chasing far behind a play

So he was indeed trying to make himself part of the play, right?

3 posted on 12/05/2002 7:15:28 AM PST by lepton
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 2 | View Replies]

To: BaghdadBarney
and runs unconscionably fast for a man his size.

He thinks how fast Warren Sapp runs is unconscionable?

4 posted on 12/05/2002 7:17:37 AM PST by lepton
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 2 | View Replies]

To: yankeedame
The league has rules in place to punish those that like to take cheap shots at other players; just ask Romanowski. Football is a dangerous game. I understood that when I was playing, the players understand that and for the most part the general public understands that. Changing the rules on the field would be wrong but levying fines and suspensions (which already happens) should curb some of it.
5 posted on 12/05/2002 7:19:19 AM PST by wasp69
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

Comment #6 Removed by Moderator

To: yankeedame
And the simple solution is to make the most gratuitous of them—when the receiver is outstretched for a ball five feet over his head or a scrambling quarterback is one inch from stepping out of bounds—illegal.

Sorry, but if a QB decides to throw his WRs "hospital balls" high over the middle...the QB is at fault, not the DB.

When an O co-ordinator decides to get cute and send five out on patterns, he's made a conscious choice to expose his QB to punishment/injury. The best protection for a QB is a strong running game.

Cheap shots are cheap shots and should be punished harshly, but physical/tough play and hard hits are an integral part of the game.
7 posted on 12/05/2002 7:20:40 AM PST by mr.pink
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: yankeedame
And the simple solution is to make the most gratuitous of them—when the receiver is outstretched for a ball five feet over his head

Or make it illegal for him to stretch out and try for a ball when it would make him so vulnerable?

or a scrambling quarterback is one inch from stepping out of bounds—illegal.

Or make the QB run out of bounds earlier...or take advantage of the slide rule - and if he heads towards the sidelines and DOENS'T run out of bounds, call an unsportsmanlike conduct penalty on him?

8 posted on 12/05/2002 7:21:33 AM PST by lepton
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: yankeedame
The truth is that fear is part of football, and of baseball. Overcoming fear is what courage is all about. If you can't do that, you will never get a hit off a Nolan Ryan, and you will never catch a high pass that forces you to stretch out and make yourself vulnerable.

Take the element of fear out of those sports and you have transformed them into track-and-field events--completely different animals.

My brother taught a kid how to throw a fastball, and in his first effort in a Little League practice game he accidentally beaned a batter. My brother called him over to him, and I called out, "Not your fault, Butch!" You could just see the relief come over him when he heard that. But I can ask myself, "If it wasn't Butch's fault, and if a kid was hurt, whose fault was it?"

But then, I'm not sure I like the answer to that! It is at the very least a cost of doing business in our culture. And possibly the responsiblity of the coach who taught the pitcher and the batter.

9 posted on 12/05/2002 7:23:13 AM PST by conservatism_IS_compassion
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: yankeedame
I bet this pansy Mark Star has never worn a jock strap. He probably prefers interviewing guys in the locker room wearing only jock straps.
10 posted on 12/05/2002 7:24:03 AM PST by FreeTally
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: yankeedame
The answer is in equipment. If a person wants to "soften" the game.... they can start by banning face masks, and make them wear leather helmets. There will still be a few psychos who lead with their head when tackeling..... but not many for very long.
11 posted on 12/05/2002 7:24:35 AM PST by kjam22
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: BaghdadBarney
Words escape me. IT'S FOOTBALL. THERE WILL BE INJURIES. WARREN SAPP HITTING A QB IS KINDA LIKE A PETERBUILT HITTING A YUGO. YUGO LOSES. Sorry, BB, the yelling isn't meant for you. If I could make big bucks playing a game, I'd think the risks would be worth it.
12 posted on 12/05/2002 7:26:38 AM PST by IYAS9YAS
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 2 | View Replies]

NFL=Gratiutous Violence?

Dummy....Gratiutous violence is in HOCKEY!!! Hell, a good ol fist fight is how them players get to know one and other..

13 posted on 12/05/2002 7:27:14 AM PST by Michael Barnes
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: IYAS9YAS
"I think I broke his ******* neck!" Longest Yard Bump.
14 posted on 12/05/2002 7:28:57 AM PST by IYAS9YAS
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 12 | View Replies]

To: yankeedame
They are well-paid gladiators and the brutal hits are part of the appeal. Change that and you'll turn it into something that appeals to me about as much as a figure skating league.
15 posted on 12/05/2002 7:30:28 AM PST by Dog Gone
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: yankeedame
This is just one of the reasons why we are giving up our Redskins season tickets after having them since inception. It has devolved into a different game: unpleasant fans, unpleasant players, unpleasant venues, unpleasant prices, etc.

Professional football is quickly gaining ground on professional wrestling in the quest to be the lowest common denominator of sports. "Professional" is a misuse of the word when referring to either of them.





16 posted on 12/05/2002 7:30:31 AM PST by VMI70
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: yankeedame
....And the simple solution is to make the most gratuitous of them—when the receiver is outstretched for a ball five feet over his head or a scrambling quarterback is one inch from stepping out of bounds—illegal......

If the players aren't aware or willing to take the risk that is involved with the game then we might as well give them all flags to stuff in their back pockets.
Most of the violence that incurs is not intentional and that which is, there are sanctions and penalties for.
17 posted on 12/05/2002 7:34:54 AM PST by underthesun
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: VMI70
You sound like you have been a football fan for quite some time. Surely you realize the brutality of the game in the 1950's and 1960's before they outlawed the "clothesline" and leading with the helmet? Jack Lambert and "Nighttrain" Lane were some brutal, feared men. And there were many others as well.

If anything, the sport has become less brutal over the past 30-40 years.

18 posted on 12/05/2002 7:36:13 AM PST by FreeTally
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 16 | View Replies]

To: yankeedame
Sapp is a low-life thug.
19 posted on 12/05/2002 7:39:38 AM PST by freedomcrusader
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: VMI70
This is just one of the reasons why we are giving up our Redskins season tickets after having them since inception. It has devolved into a different game: unpleasant fans, unpleasant players, unpleasant venues, unpleasant prices, etc.

And in the case of the Redskins one could also throw in unpleasant head coaches and unpleasant owners as well.

20 posted on 12/05/2002 7:42:08 AM PST by jpl
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 16 | View Replies]


Navigation: use the links below to view more comments.
first 1-2021-4041-6061-80 ... 121-138 next last

Disclaimer: Opinions posted on Free Republic are those of the individual posters and do not necessarily represent the opinion of Free Republic or its management. All materials posted herein are protected by copyright law and the exemption for fair use of copyrighted works.

Free Republic
Browse · Search
News/Activism
Topics · Post Article

FreeRepublic, LLC, PO BOX 9771, FRESNO, CA 93794
FreeRepublic.com is powered by software copyright 2000-2008 John Robinson