Free Republic
Browse · Search
News/Activism
Topics · Post Article

To: joesnuffy
Full story from AP site, not WP site....

Bush: Iraq Inspections 'Not Encouraging'
8 minutes ago
Add White House - AP to My Yahoo!

By SANDRA SOBIERAJ, Associated Press Writer

WASHINGTON (AP) - President Bush (news - web sites) warned Iraq's Saddam Hussein (news - web sites) that he has until a Sunday deadline to prove he is serious about averting war. After the first week of United Nations (news - web sites) weapons inspections, Bush said: "So far, the signs are not encouraging."

"The inspectors are not in Iraq to play hide-and-seek with Mr. Saddam Hussein," the president said Monday in a get-tough speech at the Pentagon (news - web sites), his first extensive comment on the United Nations weapons inspections since they got underway last week.

"In the inspections process, the United States will be making one judgment: Has Saddam Hussein changed his behavior of the last 11 years? Has he decided to cooperate willingly and comply completely, or has he not? So far the signs are not encouraging," Bush said.

As evidence, he noted that Saddam's regime has recently fired upon American and British pilots patrolling no-fly zones over Iraq and has responded to United Nations disarmament demands with "protests and falsehoods."

"On or before the eighth of December, Iraq must provide a full and accurate declaration of its weapons of mass destruction and ballistic missile programs," Bush said, referring to a deadline established by the U.N. Security Council resolution unanimously approved last month.

"That declaration must be credible and complete — or the Iraqi dictator will have demonstrated to the world once again that he has chosen not to change his behavior," Bush said.

Making clear that the consequence would be war, the president added:

"The temporary peace of denial and looking away from danger would only be a prelude to broader war and greater horror. America will confront gathering dangers early before our options become limited and desperate."

Bush spoke at a Pentagon ceremony where he also signed legislation authorizing the $355.5 billion that he requested — and received earlier this year — for the military.

Across the country, Vice President Dick Cheney (news - web sites) rounded out the White House's one-two punch at Saddam with a similar speech to 1,500 Air National Guard leaders meeting in Denver.

Cheney aimed to link the popular post-Sept. 11, 2001 war on terrorism and Osama bin Laden (news - web sites)'s al-Qaida terror network to today's campaign against Iraq.

Cheney said that, given the chance, al-Qaida would join outlaw regimes like Iraq to get weapons of mass destruction.

"That's why confronting the threat imposed by Iraq is not a distraction from the war on terror, it is absolutely crucial to winning the war on terror. The war on terror will not be won until Iraq is completely and verifiably deprived of weapons of mass destruction," Cheney said.

Cheney told the military leaders that the campaign could take years.

"This campaign may not be finished on our watch, but it must and it will be waged on our watch," Cheney said.

White House press secretary Ari Fleischer (news - web sites) said Bush will not himself review the Iraqi disclosure due on Sunday.

The timing of any subsequent action — diplomatic, military or otherwise — "will be determined by the president," said Fleischer. "... Saddam Hussein will have to figure out how long the United States intends to go along until we find out what Saddam Hussein is really doing."

The coordinated speeches by Bush and Cheney comes one week into the United Nations weapons inspections underway in Iraq.

A senior White House official said Iraq has not been as cooperative with inspectors as early reports suggest. The official, speaking on condition of anonymity, did not elaborate.

White House officials said they do not expect Bush to take immediate action against Saddam after the deadline, even if Iraq claims not to have weapons of mass destruction. Instead, the administration is prepared to share its intelligence on Iraq's weapons programs with inspectors to help verify and challenge whatever disclosures Saddam makes Dec. 8, officials said.

Fleischer said Bush is not yet making any judgments on whether those inspections will be successful in disarming Saddam peacefully. Should the inspections route fail, Bush has vowed that the United States will lead allies into war to rid Iraq of any weapons of mass destruction.

"The president is skeptical that Saddam Hussein will comply and it's too soon to say. One week is not adequate time," Fleischer said.

http://story.news.yahoo.com/news?tmpl=story2&cid=544&e=1&u=/ap/20021202/ap_on_go_pr_wh/us_iraq


12 posted on 12/02/2002 12:34:33 PM PST by deport
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies ]


To: deport
"That declaration must be credible and complete — or the Iraqi dictator will have demonstrated to the world once again that he has chosen not to change his behavior," Bush said.

My prediction: Iraq will come out with some, but not complete documentation on 12/8, and will ask for an extension.

Bush will counter with a one-week extension, coupled with a demand to visit certain sites (e.g., "presidential palaces") that have heretofore been denied to the inspectors.

After the extension expires, Bush will issue a "let us inspect or we'll blow it up" decree.

16 posted on 12/02/2002 12:42:46 PM PST by r9etb
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 12 | View Replies ]

To: deport
"The inspectors are not in Iraq to play hide-and-seek with Mr. Saddam Hussein," the president said Monday in a get-tough speech at the Pentagon (news - web sites), his first extensive comment on the United Nations weapons inspections since they got underway last week.

This is the kind of biased editorial comment that's dumped inside a purported news story that really gets under my skin. This should have been reported as a 'speech at the Pentagon'...period.

66 posted on 12/02/2002 1:53:47 PM PST by pgkdan
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 12 | View Replies ]

To: deport
"The temporary peace of denial and looking away from danger would only be a prelude to broader war and greater horror. America will confront gathering dangers early before our options become limited and desperate."

This sums up a policy, which makes sense. Does it mean that we are in "denial" about Saudi, Egypt? Or does it mean we "..will confront gathering dangers early..?"

In another place, Cheney says it will go on for years. That is difficult, for today's generations. They give blank stares, if reminded of "hundred years war" and "thirty years war."

The "cold war" with the USSR extended for 40 years. Reagan and Thatcher (almost alone) had the resolve to do what was necessary.

I fault Bush for not making the Big Case, that We Are AT War, the Enemy is (factions of) Islam, WEe Will Win.

I believe he feels the downside of doing such an expose exceeds the upside.
95 posted on 12/02/2002 4:10:45 PM PST by truth_seeker
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 12 | View Replies ]

Free Republic
Browse · Search
News/Activism
Topics · Post Article


FreeRepublic, LLC, PO BOX 9771, FRESNO, CA 93794
FreeRepublic.com is powered by software copyright 2000-2008 John Robinson